On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:13:52AM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Per Dmitry Torokhov (in a completely unrelated thread on linux-input),
following input_unregister_device with an input_free_device is
forbidden, the former is sufficient alone.
CC: Dmitry Torokhov dmitry.torok...@gmail.com
Signed
a look and let me know if I missed something important.
Thank you.
--
Dmitry
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov d...@mail.ru
---
drivers/char/keyboard.c | 31 +++-
drivers/input/evdev.c | 139 +++
drivers/input/input.c | 351
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 10:23:45AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
Em 31-07-2010 06:19, Dmitry Torokhov escreveu:
Hi Mauro,
I finally got a chance to review the patches adding handling of large
scancodes to input core and there are a few things with this approach
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 01:03:26PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
--- a/include/linux/input.h
+++ b/include/linux/input.h
@@ -56,22 +56,35 @@ struct input_absinfo {
__s32 resolution;
};
-struct keycode_table_entry {
- __u32 keycode; /* e.g
Hi Mauro,
I guess I better get off my behind and commit the changes to support large
scancodes, or they will not make to 2.6.37 either... There isn't much
changes, except I followed David's suggestion and changed boolean index
field into u8 flags field. Still, please glance it over once again and
Switch sparse keymap library to use new style of getkeycode and
setkeycode methods to allow retrieving and setting keycodes not
only by their scancodes but also by index.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov d...@mail.ru
---
drivers/input/sparse-keymap.c | 81
.
Folded fixes by:
- Dan Carpenter: locking fixes for the original implementation
- Jarod Wilson: fix crash when setting keycode and wiring up get/set
handlers in original implementation.
- Dmitry Torokhov: rework to consolidate old and new scancode handling,
provide
Switch the code to use new style of getkeycode and setkeycode
methods to allow retrieving and setting keycodes not only by
their scancodes but also by index.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov d...@mail.ru
---
drivers/input/misc/winbond-cir.c | 248 +-
1 files
Switch the code to use new style of getkeycode and setkeycode
methods to allow retrieving and setting keycodes not only by
their scancodes but also by index.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov d...@mail.ru
---
drivers/input/misc/ati_remote2.c | 93 +++---
1 files
Switch the code to use new style of getkeycode and setkeycode
methods to allow retrieving and setting keycodes not only by
their scancodes but also by index.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov d...@mail.ru
---
drivers/media/IR/ir-keytable.c | 393 +++-
include
Switch HID code to use new style of getkeycode and setkeycode
methods to allow retrieving and setting keycodes not only by
their scancodes but also by index.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov d...@mail.ru
---
drivers/hid/hid-input.c | 103 ---
1 files
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 10:31:21AM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:41:38AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Hi Mauro,
I guess I better get off my behind and commit the changes to support large
scancodes, or they will not make to 2.6.37 either... There isn't much
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 05:25:13PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, Jarod Wilson wrote:
It'll conflict a little bith with the tivo slide patch I posted
yesterday,
but mostly just minor context changes. I can redo that patch on top of
these changes if that's
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 11:48:50AM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Hi Mauro,
I guess I better get off my behind and commit the changes to support large
scancodes, or they will not make to 2.6.37 either... There isn't much
changes, except I
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:09:08PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 05:25:13PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, Jarod Wilson wrote:
It'll conflict a little bith with the tivo slide patch I posted
yesterday,
but mostly just minor context changes.
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 11:16:17PM +0200, David Härdeman wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:42:00AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Switch the code to use new style of getkeycode and setkeycode
methods to allow retrieving and setting keycodes not only by
their scancodes but also by index
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 03:40:04PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:42:05AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Switch the code to use new style of getkeycode and setkeycode
methods to allow retrieving and setting keycodes not only by
their scancodes but also by index
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 01:48:14PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 10:31:21AM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:41:38AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
...
Ville, do you
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:04:19AM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 09:28:07AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 03:40:04PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:42:05AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Switch the code to use new style
be used
uninitialized in this function
It is due to an actual bug but I don't know the fix.
The patch below should fix it. I wonder if Linus released -rc1 yet...
--
Dmitry
Input: ir-keytable - fix uninitialized variable warning
From: Dmitry Torokhov dmitry.torok...@gmail.com
We were
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 12:04:56PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, October 31, 2010 10:51:21 am Stefan Richter wrote:
Commit 9f470095068e Input: media/IR - switch to using new keycode
interface added
On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 09:39:09 am Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
This patch fixes an IR table. The patch is trivial, but there are two
buttons on this IR that are not directly supported currently (buttons 10-
and 10+). In a matter of fact, some other IR's use other key codes
-by: Dmitry Torokhov d...@mail.ru
---
drivers/input/evdev.c | 113 +
include/linux/input.h |6 ++-
2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/evdev.c b/drivers/input/evdev.c
index 17660b1..915287e 100644
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 08:04:36PM +0100, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
On 12/09/2010 10:39 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
The desire to keep old names for the EVIOCGKEYCODE/EVIOCSKEYCODE while
extending them to support large scancodes was a mistake. While we tried
to keep ABI intact (and we
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 11:16:47AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 08:04:36PM +0100, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
On 12/09/2010 10:39 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
The desire to keep old names for the EVIOCGKEYCODE/EVIOCSKEYCODE while
extending them to support large
Hi Stefan,
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 09:39:21AM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
@@ -188,6 +189,7 @@ void fdtv_handle_rc(struct firedtv *fdtv
return;
}
- input_report_key(fdtv-remote_ctrl_dev, code, 1);
- input_report_key(fdtv-remote_ctrl_dev, code, 0);
+
their state.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter stef...@s5r6.in-berlin.de
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov d...@mail.ru
---
drivers/media/dvb/firewire/firedtv-rc.c |9 ++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: b/drivers/media/dvb/firewire/firedtv-rc.c
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:07:29AM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
On 11-01-25 12:04 AM, Mark Lord wrote:
On 11-01-24 11:55 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:37:06PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
..
This results in (map-size==10) for 2.6.36+ (wrong),
and a much larger map-size
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 09:31:17PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:07:29AM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
On 11-01-25 12:04 AM, Mark Lord wrote:
On 11-01-24 11:55 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:37:06PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
..
This results
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 09:42:44AM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 25-01-2011 03:31, Dmitry Torokhov escreveu:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:07:29AM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
On 11-01-25 12:04 AM, Mark Lord wrote:
On 11-01-24 11:55 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:42:57PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 25-01-2011 04:52, Dmitry Torokhov escreveu:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 09:31:17PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:07:29AM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
On 11-01-25 12:04 AM, Mark Lord wrote:
On 11-01
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 06:09:45AM +1000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
We should be able to handle the case where scancode is valid even though
it might be unmapped yet. This is regardless of what version
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:54:53PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 06:09:45AM +1000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
We should be able to handle the case where scancode is valid even though
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 07:20:07AM +1000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW, another issue is that evdev's ioctl returns -EINVAL for unknown
ioctls so applications would have hard time figuring out whether error
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 05:22:09PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
On 11-01-25 05:00 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 25-01-2011 18:54, Dmitry Torokhov escreveu:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 06:09:45AM +1000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
dmitry.torok
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 03:29:14PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 05:22:09PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
On 11-01-25 05:00 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 25-01-2011 18:54, Dmitry Torokhov escreveu:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 06:09:45AM +1000, Linus Torvalds wrote
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:05:57AM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
On 11-01-25 09:00 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 03:29:14PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 05:22:09PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
On 11-01-25 05:00 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 25-01
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:18:29PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 26-01-2011 11:08, Gerd Hoffmann escreveu:
Hi,
Btw, I took some time to take analyse the input-kbd stuff.
As said at the README:
This is a small collection of input layer utilities. I wrote them
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:18:29PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
diff --git a/input.c b/input.c
index d57a31e..a9bd5e8 100644
--- a/input.c
+++ b/input.c
@@ -101,8 +101,8 @@ int device_open(int nr, int verbose)
close(fd);
return -1;
}
- if
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 03:41:01PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 26-01-2011 12:58, Mark Lord escreveu:
On 11-01-26 06:26 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
..
However, as said previously in this thread, input-kbd won't work with any
RC table that uses NEC extended (and there are
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 03:29:09PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 26-01-2011 14:51, Dmitry Torokhov escreveu:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:18:29PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
diff --git a/input.c b/input.c
index d57a31e..a9bd5e8 100644
--- a/input.c
+++ b/input.c
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 08:16:09PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:Hi,
The check should be against concrete version (0x1 in this case).
Stepping back: what does the version mean?
Nothing, it is just a number.
0x1 == 1.0 ?
0x10001 == 1.1 ?
No, not really.
Can I expect the
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 02:31:44PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
On 11-01-26 11:44 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:05:57AM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
..
Nope. Does not work here:
$ lsinput
protocol version mismatch (expected 65536, got 65537)
It would be much more
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 02:33:17PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
On 11-01-26 12:32 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 26-01-2011 13:05, Mark Lord escreveu:
..
Nope. Does not work here:
$ lsinput
protocol version mismatch (expected 65536, got 65537)
You need to relax the version test at
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 02:47:18PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
On 11-01-26 02:41 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
I do not consider lsinput refusing to work a regression.
Obviously, since you don't use that tool.
Those of us who do use it see this as broken userspace compatibility.
Who the hell
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 04:41:07PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
On 11-01-26 02:50 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 02:47:18PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
On 11-01-26 02:41 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
I do not consider lsinput refusing to work a regression.
Obviously, since you
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 04:49:14PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
Or perhaps get rid of that unworkable version number thing
(just freeze it in time with the 2.6.35 value returned),
and implement a get_feature_flags ioctl or something for going forward.
Then you can just turn on new bits in the flags
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 08:07:29PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
On 11-01-26 08:01 PM, Mark Lord wrote:
On 11-01-26 10:05 AM, Mark Lord wrote:
On 11-01-25 09:00 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
..
I wonder if the patch below is all that is needed...
Nope. Does not work here:
$ lsinput
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:18:53PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
On 11-01-26 09:12 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 08:07:29PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
On 11-01-26 08:01 PM, Mark Lord wrote:
On 11-01-26 10:05 AM, Mark Lord wrote:
On 11-01-25 09:00 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:18:53PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
On 11-01-26 09:12 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 08:07:29PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
On 11-01-26 08:01 PM, Mark Lord wrote:
On 11-01-26 10:05 AM, Mark Lord wrote:
On 11-01-25 09:00 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:30:00AM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
On my tests here, this is working fine, with Fedora and RHEL 6, on my
usual test devices, so I don't believe that the tool itself is broken,
nor I think that the issue is due to the fix patch.
I remember that when Kay
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 01:12:48PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
On 11-01-27 11:39 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:18:53PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
No, it does not seem to segfault when I unload/reload ir-kbd-i2c
and then invoke it by hand with the same parameters.
Quite
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 04:58:57PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 27-01-2011 15:21, Dmitry Torokhov escreveu:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:30:00AM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
On my tests here, this is working fine, with Fedora and RHEL 6, on my
usual test devices, so I don't
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 09:55:58AM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 28-01-2011 07:39, Dmitry Torokhov escreveu:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 04:58:57PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 27-01-2011 15:21, Dmitry Torokhov escreveu:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:30:00AM -0200, Mauro
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:53:25AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 01:12:48PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
On 11-01-27 11:39 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:18:53PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
No, it does not seem to segfault when I unload/reload ir-kbd
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 03:01:58PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 28-01-2011 14:40, Dmitry Torokhov escreveu:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 09:55:58AM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
The rc-core register (and the corresponding input register) is done when
the device detected
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 04:15:51PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 28-01-2011 15:33, Dmitry Torokhov escreveu:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 03:01:58PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 28-01-2011 14:40, Dmitry Torokhov escreveu:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 09:55:58AM -0200, Mauro
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 04:03:07PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
On 11-01-28 03:55 PM, Mark Lord wrote:
On 11-01-28 11:42 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:53:25AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 01:12:48PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
On 11-01-27 11:39 AM
...@teksavvy.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov d...@mail.ru
---
Linus,
Due to the fact that contents of drivers/media in my 'for-linus' branch
are quite different from mainline/Mauro's trees and I am not planning on
merging this branch until closer to the next merge window I am sending
Input: dvb-usb-remote - convert to new style of get/setkeycode
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov d...@mail.ru
---
Mauro,
This is needed so that I could rename get/setkeycode_new into
get/setkeycode and get rid of duplicate pointers and compat code in
input core.
Compiled only, not tested.
If you
Input: switch completely over to the new versions of get/setkeycode
All users of old style get/setkeycode methids have been converted so
it is time to retire them.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov d...@mail.ru
---
Jiri, Mauro,
There is not a good way to avoid crossing multiple subsystems
.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov d...@mail.ru
---
Jiri, Mauro,
There is not a good way to avoid crossing multiple subsystems but the
changes are minimal, so if you are OK with the patch I'd like to move it
through my tree for .39.
Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 08:35:22PM -0500, Andy Walls wrote:
Tejun,
I just noticed this commit:
commit 8c71778cbf2c8beaefaa2dee5478aa0622d96682
Author: Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org
Date: Fri Dec 24 16:14:20 2010 +0100
media/video: don't use flush_scheduled_work()
This
On Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:52:00 am bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org
wrote:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30022
--- Comment #7 from Mehmet Tekbaş btek...@gmail.com 2011-03-10
08:51:59 --- Tried with Inca I-TV004 (bt878 analog card) and result
didn't changed. IR
On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 02:00:53 PM Jarod Wilson wrote:
Andy Walls wrote:
Jarod Wilsonja...@redhat.com wrote:
Many media center remotes have buttons intended for jumping straight
to one type of media browser or another -- commonly,
images/photos/pictures,
audio/music, television,
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 08:59:16PM +0300, Anssi Hannula wrote:
I meant replacing the softrepeat with native repeat for such devices
that have native repeats but no native release events:
- keypress from device = keydown + keyup
- repeat from device = keydown + keyup
- repeat from device =
function difference until the referenced change
went into the input layer.
Reported-by: Stephan Raue sr...@openelec.tv
CC: Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com
CC: Jeff Brown jeffbr...@android.com
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson ja...@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov d...@mail.ru
keycode, which manifested with the reordering of calling
input_report_key and setting last_keycode.
Reported-by: Stephan Raue sr...@openelec.tv
CC: Stephan Raue sr...@openelec.tv
CC: Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com
CC: Jeff Brown jeffbr...@android.com
CC: Dmitry Torokhov d...@mail.ru
On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 09:34:45PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
This is an automatic generated email to let you know that the following patch
were queued at the
http://git.linuxtv.org/media_tree.git tree:
Subject: [media] rc: call input_sync after scancode reports
Author: Jarod
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 08:28:12PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 09:34:45PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
This is an automatic generated email to let you know that the following
On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 01:18:11AM +0300, Anssi Hannula wrote:
Add keymap for the Medion X10 RF remote which uses the ati_remote
driver, and default to it based on the usb id.
Since rc-core supports loading custom keytmaps should we ass medion
keymap here?
I think we should keep the original
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 03:14:56PM +0100, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com writes:
Event input has the advantage that the keystrokes will provide an unique
representation that is independent of the device.
This can hardly work as the only means, the
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:51:31PM +0100, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
Dmitry Torokhov dmitry.torok...@gmail.com writes:
Curreently the scan codes in the input layer serve just to help users
to map whatever the device emits into a proper input event code so that
the rest of userspace would
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:37:53PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On 11/23/2009 12:37 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 03:14:56PM +0100, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
Mauro Carvalho Chehabmche...@redhat.com writes:
Event input has the advantage that the keystrokes will provide
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 01:32:51AM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
Folks, I really want to tell everyone that doing all the mapping from
raw codes to keypresses in kernel is wrong.
Why is this wrong? Doing simple translation is easy and it does not
require having all the tables for all possible
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 07:32:42PM -0800, Trent Piepho wrote:
One thing that could be done, unless it has changed much since I wrote it
10+ years ago, is to take the mark/space protocol the ir device uses and sent
that data to lircd via the input layer. It would be less efficient, but
would
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:53:57PM -0500, Andy Walls wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 22:11 +0100, Christoph Bartelmus wrote:
Czesc Krzysztof,
on 23 Nov 09 at 15:14, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
[...]
I think we shouldn't at this time worry about IR transmitters.
Sorry, but I have to
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 09:49:28PM +0100, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
Jarod Wilson ja...@wilsonet.com writes:
Well, we've got a number of IOCTLs already, could extend those.
(Although its been suggested elsewhere that we replace the IOCTLs with
sysfs knobs).
Not sure if sysfs would be fast
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 09:01:00AM +0100, Christoph Bartelmus wrote:
Hi,
on 25 Nov 09 at 12:44, Jarod Wilson wrote:
[...]
Ah, but the approach I'd take to converting to in-kernel decoding[*] would
be this:
[...]
[*] assuming, of course, that it was actually agreed upon that in-kernel
On Nov 26, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Krzysztof Halasa k...@pm.waw.pl wrote:
Dmitry Torokhov dmitry.torok...@gmail.com writes:
In what way the key interface is unsufficient for delivering button
events?
At present: 128 different keys only (RC5: one group).
Where did this limitation come from? We
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 01:16:01AM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Nov 26, 2009, at 12:31 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:37:53PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On 11/23/2009 12:37 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 03:14:56PM +0100, Krzysztof Halasa wrote
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:58:29PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
(1) ir code (say rc5) - keycode conversion looses information.
I think this can easily be addressed by adding a IR event type to the
input layer, which could look like this:
input_event-type = EV_IR
input_event-code =
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 03:49:13PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Dmitry,
While lirc is basically a series of input drivers, considering that they have
lots
in common with the input drivers at V4L/DVB and that we'll need to work on
some glue to merge both, do you mind if I add the
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 01:13:51AM +0100, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
Dmitry Torokhov dmitry.torok...@gmail.com writes:
One remote per
device only.
Why would you want more? One physical device usually corresponds to a
logical device. If you have 2 remotes create 2 devices.
I meant per
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 09:28:51PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On 11/26/2009 06:23 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 01:16:01AM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Nov 26, 2009, at 12:31 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:37:53PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On 11
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:08:29PM -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Jarod Wilson ja...@wilsonet.com wrote:
No, at present we expect 1:1 button-event mapping leaving macro
expansion (i.e. KEY_PROG1 - do some multi-step sequence to
userspace).
Hm. So ctrl-x,
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 11:32:01PM -0500, Andy Walls wrote:
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 12:37 -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Krzysztof Halasa k...@pm.waw.pl wrote:
Jon Smirl jonsm...@gmail.com writes:
There are two very basic things that we need to reach consensus
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:17:03PM +1030, Mike Lampard wrote:
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 02:27:59 am Jon Smirl wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 2:45 AM, Christoph Bartelmus
christ...@bartelmus.de wrote:
Hi Mauro,
on 26 Nov 09 at 14:25, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Christoph Bartelmus
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 06:26:55PM -0500, Andy Walls wrote:
Jon,
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 12:37 -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Krzysztof Halasa k...@pm.waw.pl wrote:
Jon Smirl jonsm...@gmail.com writes:
There are two very basic things that we need to reach
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 05:18:34PM -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
I'm looking at a Sony multi-function remote right now. It has five
devices and forty keys. Each of the five devices can transmit 0-9,
power, volume, etc. It transmits 5*40 = 200 unique scancodes.
I want the five devices to correspond
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 04:01:53PM +1030, Mike Lampard wrote:
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 03:25:49 pm Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:17:03PM +1030, Mike Lampard wrote:
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 02:27:59 am Jon Smirl wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 2:45 AM, Christoph Bartelmus
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:34:55PM -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Jarod Wilson ja...@wilsonet.com wrote:
This part... Not so wild about. The common thought I'm seeing from people is
that we should be using setkeycode to load keymaps. I mean, sure, I suppose
this
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:58:59PM -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
Code is only lightly tested. Encoders and decoders have not been
written for all protocols. Repeat is not handled for any protocol. I'm
looking for help. There are 15 more existing LIRC drivers.
And there's the hangup for me.
On Nov 29, 2009, at 12:44 PM, Jon Smirl jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Krzysztof Halasa k...@pm.waw.pl
wrote:
1. Do we agree that a lirc (-style) kernel-user interface is needed
at
least?
2. Is there any problem with lirc kernel-user interface?
Can you
On Nov 29, 2009, at 12:27 PM, Krzysztof Halasa k...@pm.waw.pl wrote:
1. Do we agree that a lirc (-style) kernel-user interface is needed at
least?
2. Is there any problem with lirc kernel-user interface?
If the answer for #1 is yes and for #2 is no then perhaps we merge
the Jarod's lirc
On Nov 29, 2009, at 1:47 PM, Jon Smirl jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 29, 2009, at 12:44 PM, Jon Smirl jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Krzysztof Halasa k...@pm.waw.pl
wrote:
1
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 03:33:52PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
kevin granade wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
After the boot, a device can open the raw API, disabling any in-kernel
decoding/handling and handle IR directly.
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 05:00:40PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 03:29:44PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
For sure we need to add an EVIOSETPROTO ioctl to allow the driver
to change the protocol in runtime.
Mauro,
I
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 07:05:49PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 05:00:40PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 03:29:44PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
For sure we need to add
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 12:30:29PM -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 10:44:58AM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 07:05:49PM -0200, Mauro
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
