Re: bisected regression in tuner-xc2028 on DVICO dual digital 4

2009-11-05 Thread Robert Lowery
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Vincent McIntyre vincent.mcint...@gmail.com wrote: I have one of these too. lsusb: Bus 003 Device 003: ID 0fe9:db78 DVICO FusionHDTV DVB-T Dual Digital 4 (ZL10353+xc2028/xc3028) (initialized) Bus 003 Device 002: ID 0fe9:db78 DVICO FusionHDTV DVB-T Dual

Re: bisected regression in tuner-xc2028 on DVICO dual digital 4

2009-11-05 Thread Robert Lowery
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Robert Lowery rglow...@exemail.com.au wrote: Do you mean something like this (untested) patch?  I'll try it out tonight. diff -r 43878f8dbfb0 linux/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/cxusb.c --- a/linux/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/cxusb.c   Sun Nov 01 07:17:46 2009

Re: bisected regression in tuner-xc2028 on DVICO dual digital 4

2009-11-05 Thread Robert Lowery
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Robert Lowery rglow...@exemail.com.au wrote: Do you mean something like this (untested) patch?  I'll try it out tonight. diff -r 43878f8dbfb0 linux/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/cxusb.c --- a/linux/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/cxusb.c   Sun Nov 01 07:17:46 2009

Re: bisected regression in tuner-xc2028 on DVICO dual digital 4

2009-11-08 Thread Robert Lowery
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Devin Heitmueller dheitmuel...@kernellabs.com wrote: On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Barry Williams bazzaw...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Devin I tried your tree and I seem to get the same problem on one box I get the flood of 'dvb-usb: bulk message failed: -110

Re: [XC3028] Terretec Cinergy T XS wrong firmware xc3028-v27.fw

2009-11-09 Thread Robert Lowery
Em Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:13:22 +0100 Valerio Bontempi valerio.bonte...@gmail.com escreveu: Hi all, I have a problem trying to user Terratec Cinergy T XS (usb dvb only adapter) with XC3028 tuner: v4l dvb driver installed in last kernel versions (actually I am using 2.6.31 from ubuntu 9.10)

Re: [XC3028] Terretec Cinergy T XS wrong firmware xc3028-v27.fw

2009-11-09 Thread Robert Lowery
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Robert Lowery rglow...@exemail.com.au wrote: Although the xc3028-v27.fw generated from HVR-12x0-14x0-17x0_1_25_25271_WHQL.zip using the above process works fine for me, the firmware is a couple of years old now and I can't help wondering if there might

DViCO FusionHDTV DVB-T Dual Digital 4 (rev 1) tuning regression

2009-11-25 Thread Robert Lowery
Hi, After fixing up a hang on the DViCO FusionHDTV DVB-T Dual Digital 4 (rev 1) recently via http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/rev/1c11cb54f24d everything appeared to be ok, but I have now noticed certain channels in Australia are showing corruption which manifest themselves as blockiness and

DViCO FusionHDTV DVB-T Dual Digital 4 (rev 1) tuning regression

2009-11-25 Thread Robert Lowery
Hi, After fixing up a hang on the DViCO FusionHDTV DVB-T Dual Digital 4 (rev 1) recently via http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/rev/1c11cb54f24d everything appeared to be ok, but I have now noticed certain channels in Australia are showing corruption which manifest themselves as blockiness and

Re: DViCO FusionHDTV DVB-T Dual Digital 4 (rev 1) tuning regression

2009-11-26 Thread Robert Lowery
Hi, After fixing up a hang on the DViCO FusionHDTV DVB-T Dual Digital 4 (rev 1) recently via http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/rev/1c11cb54f24d everything appeared to be ok, but I have now noticed certain channels in Australia are showing corruption which manifest themselves as blockiness and

Re: DViCO FusionHDTV DVB-T Dual Digital 4 (rev 1) tuning regression

2009-11-26 Thread Robert Lowery
in the output from 'tzap'. Kind regards, Vince revert patch attached On 11/26/09, Robert Lowery rglow...@exemail.com.au wrote: Hi, After fixing up a hang on the DViCO FusionHDTV DVB-T Dual Digital 4 (rev 1) recently via http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/rev/1c11cb54f24d everything appeared

Re: DViCO FusionHDTV DVB-T Dual Digital 4 (rev 1) tuning regression

2009-12-01 Thread Robert Lowery
Hi Rob I missed your followup and tested the 'revert.diff' patch, attached for reference. I have been slow replying because I've been scratching my head over the results. I used 'signaltest.pl' to test[1], which uses tzap under the hood. Perhaps this is not the best choice, but I wanted

[RESEND] Re: DViCO FusionHDTV DVB-T Dual Digital 4 (rev 1) tuning regression

2009-12-07 Thread Robert Lowery
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Vincent McIntyre vincent.mcint...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Rob I missed your followup and tested the 'revert.diff' patch, attached for reference. I have been slow replying because I've been scratching my head over the results. I used 'signaltest.pl' to test[1],

Re: [RESEND] Re: DViCO FusionHDTV DVB-T Dual Digital 4 (rev 1) tuning regression

2009-12-15 Thread Robert Lowery
Signed-off-by: Robert Lowery rglow...@exemail.com.au Thanks -Rob 01_revert_966ce12c444d.diff Description: / 02_revert_e6a8672631a0.diff Description: / 03_refix_e6a8672631a0.diff Description: /

Re: [RESEND] Re: DViCO FusionHDTV DVB-T Dual Digital 4 (rev 1) tuning regression

2010-01-03 Thread Robert Lowery
and merge Signed-off-by: Robert Lowery rglow...@exemail.com.au Mauro, I'm yet to receive a response from you on this clear regression introduced in the 2.6.31 kernel. You attention would be appreciated Thanks -Rob Thanks -Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux

Re: [RESEND] Re: DViCO FusionHDTV DVB-T Dual Digital 4 (rev 1) tuning regression

2010-01-05 Thread Robert Lowery
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 21:27 -0500, Andy Walls wrote: On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 15:27 +1100, Robert Lowery wrote: Mauro, I've split the revert2.diff that I sent you previously to fix the tuning regression on my DViCO Dual Digital 4 (rev 1) into three separate patches

Re: [RESEND] Re: DViCO FusionHDTV DVB-T Dual Digital 4 (rev 1) tuning regression

2010-01-06 Thread Robert Lowery
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 14:20 +1100, Robert Lowery wrote: On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 21:27 -0500, Andy Walls wrote: On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 15:27 +1100, Robert Lowery wrote: Mauro, I've split the revert2.diff that I sent you previously to fix the tuning regression on my DViCO Dual

Re: [RESEND] Re: DViCO FusionHDTV DVB-T Dual Digital 4 (rev 1) tuning regression

2010-01-07 Thread Robert Lowery
anything for 7MHz and 8MHz. Terry 2010/1/7 Robert Lowery rglow...@exemail.com.au: On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 14:20 +1100, Robert Lowery wrote: On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 21:27 -0500, Andy Walls wrote: On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 15:27 +1100, Robert Lowery wrote: Mauro, I've split the revert2.diff

Re: [RESEND] Re: DViCO FusionHDTV DVB-T Dual Digital 4 (rev 1) tuning regression

2010-02-18 Thread Robert Lowery
Robert Lowery wrote: Mauro's new code does the 50 offset unconditionally for DTV7 by setting offset = 225, not just when the ZARLINK456 or DIBCOM52 tables were explicitly selected. This change is what appears to cause issues for me. I've reviewed all information and troubles we

Re: [RESEND] Re: DViCO FusionHDTV DVB-T Dual Digital 4 (rev 1) tuning regression

2010-02-19 Thread Robert Lowery
Mauro, I had to make 2 changes to get the patch to work for me see below HTH -Rob Robert Lowery wrote: Mauro's new code does the 50 offset unconditionally for DTV7 by setting offset = 225, not just when the ZARLINK456 or DIBCOM52 tables were explicitly selected. This change

Re: [RESEND] Re: DViCO FusionHDTV DVB-T Dual Digital 4 (rev 1) tuning regression

2010-02-19 Thread Robert Lowery
Robert Lowery wrote: Mauro, I had to make 2 changes to get the patch to work for me Ok. Please test this (hopefully) final revision. This version works for me -- commit bd8bb8798bb96136b6898186d505c9e154334b5d Author: Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com Date: Fri Feb 19 02:45