RE: [PATCH] v4l2 doc: Added FBUF_CAP_SRC_CHROMAKEY/FLAG_SRC_CHROMAKEY

2011-11-08 Thread Hiremath, Vaibhav
-Original Message- From: Hans Verkuil [mailto:hverk...@xs4all.nl] Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 7:06 PM To: Hiremath, Vaibhav Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] v4l2 doc: Added FBUF_CAP_SRC_CHROMAKEY/FLAG_SRC_CHROMAKEY Hi Vaibhav! This is a bit of a 'blast

Re: [PATCH] v4l2 doc: Added FBUF_CAP_SRC_CHROMAKEY/FLAG_SRC_CHROMAKEY

2011-11-08 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Tuesday, November 08, 2011 12:46:32 Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote: -Original Message- From: Hans Verkuil [mailto:hverk...@xs4all.nl] Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 7:06 PM To: Hiremath, Vaibhav Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] v4l2 doc: Added

Re: [PATCH] v4l2 doc: Added FBUF_CAP_SRC_CHROMAKEY/FLAG_SRC_CHROMAKEY

2011-11-07 Thread Hans Verkuil
Hi Vaibhav! This is a bit of a 'blast from the past', but when I went through the documentation of the framebuffer flags in the V4L2 spec I noticed that the definition of V4L2_FBUF_CAP_SRC_CHROMAKEY seemed to be wrong. The definition of V4L2_FBUF_CAP_CHROMAKEY says: 'The device supports

[PATCH] v4l2 doc: Added FBUF_CAP_SRC_CHROMAKEY/FLAG_SRC_CHROMAKEY

2009-11-10 Thread hvaibhav
From: Vaibhav Hiremath hvaib...@ti.com Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath hvaib...@ti.com --- linux/Documentation/DocBook/v4l/videodev2.h.xml |2 ++ linux/Documentation/DocBook/v4l/vidioc-g-fbuf.xml | 17 + 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git