On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 10:04 PM Sakari Ailus wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 01:51:39PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On 08/30/2018 12:15 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > > Hi Hans,
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot for working on this!
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 03:49:10PM +0200, Hans Verkuil
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 01:51:39PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 08/30/2018 12:15 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi Hans,
> >
> > Thanks a lot for working on this!
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 03:49:10PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >> From: Hans Verkuil
> >>
> >> If requests are not
On 08/30/2018 12:15 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> Thanks a lot for working on this!
>
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 03:49:10PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> From: Hans Verkuil
>>
>> If requests are not supported by the driver, then return EACCES, not
>> EPERM. This is consistent with the
Hi Hans,
Thanks a lot for working on this!
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 03:49:10PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> From: Hans Verkuil
>
> If requests are not supported by the driver, then return EACCES, not
> EPERM. This is consistent with the error that an invalid request_fd will
> give, and if
From: Hans Verkuil
If requests are not supported by the driver, then return EACCES, not
EPERM. This is consistent with the error that an invalid request_fd will
give, and if requests are not supported, then all request_fd values are
invalid.
Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil
---
