Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] dma-buf: Rename dma-ops to prevent conflict with kunmap_atomic macro

Hi Marek, Thanks! On 20 April 2017 at 13:36, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > Hi All, > > On 2017-04-20 09:51, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 01:36:10PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: >>> >>> Seeing the kunmap_atomic dma_buf_ops share the same name with a

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] dma-buf: Rename dma-ops to prevent conflict with kunmap_atomic macro

Hi All, On 2017-04-20 09:51, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 01:36:10PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: Seeing the kunmap_atomic dma_buf_ops share the same name with a macro in highmem.h, the former can be aliased if any dma-buf user includes that header. I'm personally trying to

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] dma-buf: Rename dma-ops to prevent conflict with kunmap_atomic macro

Hi Logan, Thanks for the patch. On 20 April 2017 at 13:21, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 01:36:10PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: >> Seeing the kunmap_atomic dma_buf_ops share the same name with a macro >> in highmem.h, the former can be aliased if any dma-buf

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] dma-buf: Rename dma-ops to prevent conflict with kunmap_atomic macro

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 01:36:10PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: > Seeing the kunmap_atomic dma_buf_ops share the same name with a macro > in highmem.h, the former can be aliased if any dma-buf user includes > that header. > > I'm personally trying to include highmem.h inside scatterlist.h and