Re: [PATCH] New V4L2 ioctls for OMAP class of Devices

2009-01-27 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 05:43:25 Shah, Hardik wrote: -Original Message- From: Hans Verkuil [mailto:hverk...@xs4all.nl] Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2009 3:06 PM To: Shah, Hardik Cc: video4linux-l...@redhat.com; linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] New V4L2 ioctls

Re: [PATCH] New V4L2 ioctls for OMAP class of Devices

2009-01-27 Thread Hans Verkuil
Subject: Re: [PATCH] New V4L2 ioctls for OMAP class of Devices On Saturday 24 January 2009 18:03:51 Shah, Hardik wrote: -Original Message- From: Shah, Hardik Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 5:24 PM To: video4linux-l...@redhat.com; linux-media@vger.kernel.org

RE: [PATCH] New V4L2 ioctls for OMAP class of Devices

2009-01-27 Thread Shah, Hardik
-Original Message- From: Hans Verkuil [mailto:hverk...@xs4all.nl] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 2:40 PM To: Shah, Hardik Cc: video4linux-l...@redhat.com; linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] New V4L2 ioctls for OMAP class of Devices On Tuesday 27 January 2009 05:43

RE: [PATCH] New V4L2 ioctls for OMAP class of Devices

2009-01-27 Thread Trent Piepho
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Shah, Hardik wrote: The rotation values are 0, 90, 180 and 270 degree but to disable rotation the value passed should be -1 and this is one more value. I know 0 degree rotation corresponds to rotation disabled but DSS hardware requires 0 degree rotation to be enabled for

Re: [PATCH] New V4L2 ioctls for OMAP class of Devices

2009-01-27 Thread Trent Piepho
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote: [Shah, Hardik] Hi Hans, I got your above point. Now regarding the enum I am not sure about how to implement it. Are you suggesting me to remove the control ID for rotation and implement in some other way. Please let me know if I am missing

Re: [PATCH] New V4L2 ioctls for OMAP class of Devices

2009-01-27 Thread Trent Piepho
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote: On Tuesday 27 January 2009 19:08:43 Trent Piepho wrote: On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote: [Shah, Hardik] Hi Hans, I got your above point. Now regarding the enum I am not sure about how to implement it. Are you suggesting me to remove

RE: [PATCH] New V4L2 ioctls for OMAP class of Devices

2009-01-26 Thread Shah, Hardik
-Original Message- From: Hans Verkuil [mailto:hverk...@xs4all.nl] Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2009 3:06 PM To: Shah, Hardik Cc: video4linux-l...@redhat.com; linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] New V4L2 ioctls for OMAP class of Devices On Saturday 24 January 2009 18:03

Re: [PATCH] New V4L2 ioctls for OMAP class of Devices

2009-01-25 Thread Laurent Pinchart
On Sunday 25 January 2009, Laurent Pinchart wrote: On Sunday 25 January 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote: On Saturday 24 January 2009 18:03:51 Shah, Hardik wrote: -Original Message- From: Shah, Hardik Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 5:24 PM To: video4linux-l...@redhat.com;

Re: [PATCH] New V4L2 ioctls for OMAP class of Devices

2009-01-25 Thread Trent Piepho
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote: I also would like to see the documentation for these ioctls and controls. I hope my www.linuxtv.org/hg/~hverkuil/v4l-dvb-spec tree will be merged soon with the master, but in the meantime you can mail a diff against the documentation in my tree. I will

RE: [PATCH] New V4L2 ioctls for OMAP class of Devices

2009-01-24 Thread Shah, Hardik
-Original Message- From: Shah, Hardik Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 5:24 PM To: video4linux-l...@redhat.com; linux-media@vger.kernel.org Cc: Shah, Hardik; Jadav, Brijesh R; Nagalla, Hari; Hadli, Manjunath; R, Sivaraj; Hiremath, Vaibhav Subject: [PATCH] New V4L2 ioctls for OMAP