Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: avoid using IS_ERR_OR_NULL
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 07:42:17AM -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Colin Cross ccr...@android.com wrote:
dma_buf_map_attachment and dma_buf_vmap can return NULL or
ERR_PTR on a error. This encourages a common buggy pattern in
callers:
sgt = dma_buf_map_attachment(attach, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sgt))
return PTR_ERR(sgt);
This causes the caller to return 0 on an error. IS_ERR_OR_NULL
is almost always a sign of poorly-defined error handling.
This patch converts dma_buf_map_attachment to always return
ERR_PTR, and fixes the callers that incorrectly handled NULL.
There are a few more callers that were not checking for NULL
at all, which would have dereferenced a NULL pointer later.
There are also a few more callers that correctly handled NULL
and ERR_PTR differently, I left those alone but they could also
be modified to delete the NULL check.
This patch also converts dma_buf_vmap to always return NULL.
All the callers to dma_buf_vmap only check for NULL, and would
have dereferenced an ERR_PTR and panic'd if one was ever
returned. This is not consistent with the rest of the dma buf
APIs, but matches the expectations of all of the callers.
Signed-off-by: Colin Cross ccr...@android.com
---
drivers/base/dma-buf.c | 18 +++---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c| 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dmabuf.c | 2 +-
drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-dma-contig.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c b/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
index 1e16cbd61da2..cfe1d8bc7bb8 100644
--- a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
@@ -251,9 +251,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_put);
* @dmabuf:[in]buffer to attach device to.
* @dev: [in]device to be attached.
*
- * Returns struct dma_buf_attachment * for this attachment; may return
negative
- * error codes.
- *
+ * Returns struct dma_buf_attachment * for this attachment; returns
ERR_PTR on
+ * error.
*/
struct dma_buf_attachment *dma_buf_attach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
struct device *dev)
@@ -319,9 +318,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_detach);
* @attach:[in]attachment whose scatterlist is to be returned
* @direction: [in]direction of DMA transfer
*
- * Returns sg_table containing the scatterlist to be returned; may return
NULL
- * or ERR_PTR.
- *
+ * Returns sg_table containing the scatterlist to be returned; returns
ERR_PTR
+ * on error.
*/
struct sg_table *dma_buf_map_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,
enum dma_data_direction direction)
@@ -334,6 +332,8 @@ struct sg_table *dma_buf_map_attachment(struct
dma_buf_attachment *attach,
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
sg_table = attach-dmabuf-ops-map_dma_buf(attach, direction);
+ if (!sg_table)
+ sg_table = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
return sg_table;
}
@@ -544,6 +544,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_mmap);
* These calls are optional in drivers. The intended use for them
* is for mapping objects linear in kernel space for high use objects.
* Please attempt to use kmap/kunmap before thinking about these
interfaces.
+ *
+ * Returns NULL on error.
*/
void *dma_buf_vmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
{
@@ -566,7 +568,9 @@ void *dma_buf_vmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
BUG_ON(dmabuf-vmap_ptr);
ptr = dmabuf-ops-vmap(dmabuf);
- if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ptr))
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ERR(ptr)))
since vmap is optional, the WARN_ON might be a bit strong.. although
it would be a bit strange for an exporter to supply a vmap fxn which
always returned NULL, not sure about that. Just thought I'd mention
it in case anyone else had an opinion about that.
Yeah, I don't like this, it could cause unnecessary reports of problems.
Care to fix it up?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: avoid using IS_ERR_OR_NULL
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 07:42:17AM -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Colin Cross ccr...@android.com wrote:
dma_buf_map_attachment and dma_buf_vmap can return NULL or
ERR_PTR on a error. This encourages a common buggy pattern in
callers:
sgt = dma_buf_map_attachment(attach, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sgt))
return PTR_ERR(sgt);
This causes the caller to return 0 on an error. IS_ERR_OR_NULL
is almost always a sign of poorly-defined error handling.
This patch converts dma_buf_map_attachment to always return
ERR_PTR, and fixes the callers that incorrectly handled NULL.
There are a few more callers that were not checking for NULL
at all, which would have dereferenced a NULL pointer later.
There are also a few more callers that correctly handled NULL
and ERR_PTR differently, I left those alone but they could also
be modified to delete the NULL check.
This patch also converts dma_buf_vmap to always return NULL.
All the callers to dma_buf_vmap only check for NULL, and would
have dereferenced an ERR_PTR and panic'd if one was ever
returned. This is not consistent with the rest of the dma buf
APIs, but matches the expectations of all of the callers.
Signed-off-by: Colin Cross ccr...@android.com
---
drivers/base/dma-buf.c | 18 +++---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c| 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dmabuf.c | 2 +-
drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-dma-contig.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c b/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
index 1e16cbd61da2..cfe1d8bc7bb8 100644
--- a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
@@ -251,9 +251,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_put);
* @dmabuf:[in]buffer to attach device to.
* @dev: [in]device to be attached.
*
- * Returns struct dma_buf_attachment * for this attachment; may return
negative
- * error codes.
- *
+ * Returns struct dma_buf_attachment * for this attachment; returns
ERR_PTR on
+ * error.
*/
struct dma_buf_attachment *dma_buf_attach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
struct device *dev)
@@ -319,9 +318,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_detach);
* @attach:[in]attachment whose scatterlist is to be returned
* @direction: [in]direction of DMA transfer
*
- * Returns sg_table containing the scatterlist to be returned; may return
NULL
- * or ERR_PTR.
- *
+ * Returns sg_table containing the scatterlist to be returned; returns
ERR_PTR
+ * on error.
*/
struct sg_table *dma_buf_map_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,
enum dma_data_direction direction)
@@ -334,6 +332,8 @@ struct sg_table *dma_buf_map_attachment(struct
dma_buf_attachment *attach,
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
sg_table = attach-dmabuf-ops-map_dma_buf(attach, direction);
+ if (!sg_table)
+ sg_table = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
return sg_table;
}
@@ -544,6 +544,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_mmap);
* These calls are optional in drivers. The intended use for them
* is for mapping objects linear in kernel space for high use objects.
* Please attempt to use kmap/kunmap before thinking about these
interfaces.
+ *
+ * Returns NULL on error.
*/
void *dma_buf_vmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
{
@@ -566,7 +568,9 @@ void *dma_buf_vmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
BUG_ON(dmabuf-vmap_ptr);
ptr = dmabuf-ops-vmap(dmabuf);
- if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ptr))
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ERR(ptr)))
since vmap is optional, the WARN_ON might be a bit strong.. although
it would be a bit strange for an exporter to supply a vmap fxn which
always returned NULL, not sure about that. Just thought I'd mention
it in case anyone else had an opinion about that.
Yeah, I don't like this, it could cause unnecessary reports of problems.
The WARN_ON_ONCE is only if the vmap op returns ERR_PTR, not if it
returns NULL. This is designed to catch vmap ops that don't follow
the spec, so I would call them necessary reports, but I can take it
out if you still disagree.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: avoid using IS_ERR_OR_NULL
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 09:22:37AM -0800, Colin Cross wrote:
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 07:42:17AM -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Colin Cross ccr...@android.com wrote:
dma_buf_map_attachment and dma_buf_vmap can return NULL or
ERR_PTR on a error. This encourages a common buggy pattern in
callers:
sgt = dma_buf_map_attachment(attach, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sgt))
return PTR_ERR(sgt);
This causes the caller to return 0 on an error. IS_ERR_OR_NULL
is almost always a sign of poorly-defined error handling.
This patch converts dma_buf_map_attachment to always return
ERR_PTR, and fixes the callers that incorrectly handled NULL.
There are a few more callers that were not checking for NULL
at all, which would have dereferenced a NULL pointer later.
There are also a few more callers that correctly handled NULL
and ERR_PTR differently, I left those alone but they could also
be modified to delete the NULL check.
This patch also converts dma_buf_vmap to always return NULL.
All the callers to dma_buf_vmap only check for NULL, and would
have dereferenced an ERR_PTR and panic'd if one was ever
returned. This is not consistent with the rest of the dma buf
APIs, but matches the expectations of all of the callers.
Signed-off-by: Colin Cross ccr...@android.com
---
drivers/base/dma-buf.c | 18 +++---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c| 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dmabuf.c | 2 +-
drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-dma-contig.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c b/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
index 1e16cbd61da2..cfe1d8bc7bb8 100644
--- a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
@@ -251,9 +251,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_put);
* @dmabuf:[in]buffer to attach device to.
* @dev: [in]device to be attached.
*
- * Returns struct dma_buf_attachment * for this attachment; may return
negative
- * error codes.
- *
+ * Returns struct dma_buf_attachment * for this attachment; returns
ERR_PTR on
+ * error.
*/
struct dma_buf_attachment *dma_buf_attach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
struct device *dev)
@@ -319,9 +318,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_detach);
* @attach:[in]attachment whose scatterlist is to be returned
* @direction: [in]direction of DMA transfer
*
- * Returns sg_table containing the scatterlist to be returned; may
return NULL
- * or ERR_PTR.
- *
+ * Returns sg_table containing the scatterlist to be returned; returns
ERR_PTR
+ * on error.
*/
struct sg_table *dma_buf_map_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment
*attach,
enum dma_data_direction
direction)
@@ -334,6 +332,8 @@ struct sg_table *dma_buf_map_attachment(struct
dma_buf_attachment *attach,
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
sg_table = attach-dmabuf-ops-map_dma_buf(attach, direction);
+ if (!sg_table)
+ sg_table = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
return sg_table;
}
@@ -544,6 +544,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_mmap);
* These calls are optional in drivers. The intended use for them
* is for mapping objects linear in kernel space for high use objects.
* Please attempt to use kmap/kunmap before thinking about these
interfaces.
+ *
+ * Returns NULL on error.
*/
void *dma_buf_vmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
{
@@ -566,7 +568,9 @@ void *dma_buf_vmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
BUG_ON(dmabuf-vmap_ptr);
ptr = dmabuf-ops-vmap(dmabuf);
- if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ptr))
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ERR(ptr)))
since vmap is optional, the WARN_ON might be a bit strong.. although
it would be a bit strange for an exporter to supply a vmap fxn which
always returned NULL, not sure about that. Just thought I'd mention
it in case anyone else had an opinion about that.
Yeah, I don't like this, it could cause unnecessary reports of problems.
The WARN_ON_ONCE is only if the vmap op returns ERR_PTR, not if it
returns NULL. This is designed to catch vmap ops that don't follow
the spec, so I would call them necessary reports, but I can take it
out if you still disagree.
Ah, ok, that makes more sense. I'll queue this up.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: avoid using IS_ERR_OR_NULL
Em Sat, 21 Dec 2013 07:42:17 -0500
Rob Clark robdcl...@gmail.com escreveu:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Colin Cross ccr...@android.com wrote:
dma_buf_map_attachment and dma_buf_vmap can return NULL or
ERR_PTR on a error. This encourages a common buggy pattern in
callers:
sgt = dma_buf_map_attachment(attach, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sgt))
return PTR_ERR(sgt);
This causes the caller to return 0 on an error. IS_ERR_OR_NULL
is almost always a sign of poorly-defined error handling.
This patch converts dma_buf_map_attachment to always return
ERR_PTR, and fixes the callers that incorrectly handled NULL.
There are a few more callers that were not checking for NULL
at all, which would have dereferenced a NULL pointer later.
There are also a few more callers that correctly handled NULL
and ERR_PTR differently, I left those alone but they could also
be modified to delete the NULL check.
This patch also converts dma_buf_vmap to always return NULL.
All the callers to dma_buf_vmap only check for NULL, and would
have dereferenced an ERR_PTR and panic'd if one was ever
returned. This is not consistent with the rest of the dma buf
APIs, but matches the expectations of all of the callers.
Signed-off-by: Colin Cross ccr...@android.com
---
drivers/base/dma-buf.c | 18 +++---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c| 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dmabuf.c | 2 +-
drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-dma-contig.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c b/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
index 1e16cbd61da2..cfe1d8bc7bb8 100644
--- a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
@@ -251,9 +251,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_put);
* @dmabuf:[in]buffer to attach device to.
* @dev: [in]device to be attached.
*
- * Returns struct dma_buf_attachment * for this attachment; may return
negative
- * error codes.
- *
+ * Returns struct dma_buf_attachment * for this attachment; returns
ERR_PTR on
+ * error.
*/
struct dma_buf_attachment *dma_buf_attach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
struct device *dev)
@@ -319,9 +318,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_detach);
* @attach:[in]attachment whose scatterlist is to be returned
* @direction: [in]direction of DMA transfer
*
- * Returns sg_table containing the scatterlist to be returned; may return
NULL
- * or ERR_PTR.
- *
+ * Returns sg_table containing the scatterlist to be returned; returns
ERR_PTR
+ * on error.
*/
struct sg_table *dma_buf_map_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,
enum dma_data_direction direction)
@@ -334,6 +332,8 @@ struct sg_table *dma_buf_map_attachment(struct
dma_buf_attachment *attach,
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
sg_table = attach-dmabuf-ops-map_dma_buf(attach, direction);
+ if (!sg_table)
+ sg_table = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
return sg_table;
}
@@ -544,6 +544,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_mmap);
* These calls are optional in drivers. The intended use for them
* is for mapping objects linear in kernel space for high use objects.
* Please attempt to use kmap/kunmap before thinking about these
interfaces.
+ *
+ * Returns NULL on error.
*/
void *dma_buf_vmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
{
@@ -566,7 +568,9 @@ void *dma_buf_vmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
BUG_ON(dmabuf-vmap_ptr);
ptr = dmabuf-ops-vmap(dmabuf);
- if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ptr))
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ERR(ptr)))
since vmap is optional, the WARN_ON might be a bit strong.. although
it would be a bit strange for an exporter to supply a vmap fxn which
always returned NULL, not sure about that. Just thought I'd mention
it in case anyone else had an opinion about that.
But either way:
Reviewed-by: Rob Clark robdcl...@gmail.com
IMHO, a WARN_ON_ONCE() here (or some other error report printk) seems ok,
as, if this function is called, the caller would be expecting it to not
fail.
Either way:
Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab m.che...@samsung.com
+ ptr = NULL;
+ if (!ptr)
goto out_unlock;
dmabuf-vmap_ptr = ptr;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c
index 56805c39c906..bb516fdd195d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c
@@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ struct drm_gem_object *drm_gem_prime_import(struct
drm_device *dev,
get_dma_buf(dma_buf);
sgt = dma_buf_map_attachment(attach, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
- if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sgt)) {
+ if (IS_ERR(sgt)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(sgt);
goto
Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: avoid using IS_ERR_OR_NULL
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Colin Cross ccr...@android.com wrote:
dma_buf_map_attachment and dma_buf_vmap can return NULL or
ERR_PTR on a error. This encourages a common buggy pattern in
callers:
sgt = dma_buf_map_attachment(attach, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sgt))
return PTR_ERR(sgt);
This causes the caller to return 0 on an error. IS_ERR_OR_NULL
is almost always a sign of poorly-defined error handling.
This patch converts dma_buf_map_attachment to always return
ERR_PTR, and fixes the callers that incorrectly handled NULL.
There are a few more callers that were not checking for NULL
at all, which would have dereferenced a NULL pointer later.
There are also a few more callers that correctly handled NULL
and ERR_PTR differently, I left those alone but they could also
be modified to delete the NULL check.
This patch also converts dma_buf_vmap to always return NULL.
All the callers to dma_buf_vmap only check for NULL, and would
have dereferenced an ERR_PTR and panic'd if one was ever
returned. This is not consistent with the rest of the dma buf
APIs, but matches the expectations of all of the callers.
Signed-off-by: Colin Cross ccr...@android.com
---
drivers/base/dma-buf.c | 18 +++---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c| 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dmabuf.c | 2 +-
drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-dma-contig.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c b/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
index 1e16cbd61da2..cfe1d8bc7bb8 100644
--- a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
@@ -251,9 +251,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_put);
* @dmabuf:[in]buffer to attach device to.
* @dev: [in]device to be attached.
*
- * Returns struct dma_buf_attachment * for this attachment; may return
negative
- * error codes.
- *
+ * Returns struct dma_buf_attachment * for this attachment; returns ERR_PTR
on
+ * error.
*/
struct dma_buf_attachment *dma_buf_attach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
struct device *dev)
@@ -319,9 +318,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_detach);
* @attach:[in]attachment whose scatterlist is to be returned
* @direction: [in]direction of DMA transfer
*
- * Returns sg_table containing the scatterlist to be returned; may return
NULL
- * or ERR_PTR.
- *
+ * Returns sg_table containing the scatterlist to be returned; returns
ERR_PTR
+ * on error.
*/
struct sg_table *dma_buf_map_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,
enum dma_data_direction direction)
@@ -334,6 +332,8 @@ struct sg_table *dma_buf_map_attachment(struct
dma_buf_attachment *attach,
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
sg_table = attach-dmabuf-ops-map_dma_buf(attach, direction);
+ if (!sg_table)
+ sg_table = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
return sg_table;
}
@@ -544,6 +544,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_mmap);
* These calls are optional in drivers. The intended use for them
* is for mapping objects linear in kernel space for high use objects.
* Please attempt to use kmap/kunmap before thinking about these interfaces.
+ *
+ * Returns NULL on error.
*/
void *dma_buf_vmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
{
@@ -566,7 +568,9 @@ void *dma_buf_vmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
BUG_ON(dmabuf-vmap_ptr);
ptr = dmabuf-ops-vmap(dmabuf);
- if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ptr))
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ERR(ptr)))
since vmap is optional, the WARN_ON might be a bit strong.. although
it would be a bit strange for an exporter to supply a vmap fxn which
always returned NULL, not sure about that. Just thought I'd mention
it in case anyone else had an opinion about that.
But either way:
Reviewed-by: Rob Clark robdcl...@gmail.com
+ ptr = NULL;
+ if (!ptr)
goto out_unlock;
dmabuf-vmap_ptr = ptr;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c
index 56805c39c906..bb516fdd195d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c
@@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ struct drm_gem_object *drm_gem_prime_import(struct
drm_device *dev,
get_dma_buf(dma_buf);
sgt = dma_buf_map_attachment(attach, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
- if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sgt)) {
+ if (IS_ERR(sgt)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(sgt);
goto fail_detach;
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dmabuf.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dmabuf.c
index 59827cc5e770..c786cd4f457b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dmabuf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dmabuf.c
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ struct drm_gem_object *exynos_dmabuf_prime_import(struct
drm_device *drm_dev,
get_dma_buf(dma_buf);
sgt =
