Hi!
> > > Nevertheless, V4L2_CID_FOCUS_ABSOLUTE
> > > is documented as follows (emphasis mine):
> > >
> > > This control sets the *focal point* of the camera to the specified
> > > position. The unit is undefined. Positive values set the focus
> > > closer to the camera, negative values
Hi Mauro,
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 10:51:18AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Sun, 16 Apr 2017 12:12:10 +0300
> Sakari Ailus escreveu:
>
> > Hi Mauro,
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 11:23:32PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > Hi Sakari,
> > >
> > > Em
Em Sat, 29 Apr 2017 00:00:05 +0200
Pavel Machek escreveu:
> Hi!
>
> > Hmm... if the idea is to have a control that doesn't do ringing
> > compensation, then it should be clear at the control's descriptions
> > that:
> >
> > - V4L2_CID_FOCUS_ABSOLUTE should be used if the VCM has
Hi!
> Hmm... if the idea is to have a control that doesn't do ringing
> compensation, then it should be clear at the control's descriptions
> that:
>
> - V4L2_CID_FOCUS_ABSOLUTE should be used if the VCM has ringing
> compensation;
> - V4L2_CID_VOICE_COIL_CURRENT and
Em Sun, 16 Apr 2017 12:12:10 +0300
Sakari Ailus escreveu:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 11:23:32PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Hi Sakari,
> >
> > Em Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:20:22 +0200
> > Sakari Ailus escreveu:
> >
> > >
Hi Mauro,
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 11:23:32PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Hi Sakari,
>
> Em Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:20:22 +0200
> Sakari Ailus escreveu:
>
> > Add a V4L2 control class for voice coil lens driver devices. These are
> > simple devices that are
Hi!
> Worse than that, patch 2/2 gives the false sensation that both
> controls are equal.
>
> Ok, I understand that they need to be identical on the existing
> driver, in order to keep backward compatibility, but I'm afraid
> that, without a clear distinction between them at the documentation,
Hi Sakari,
Em Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:20:22 +0200
Sakari Ailus escreveu:
> Add a V4L2 control class for voice coil lens driver devices. These are
> simple devices that are used to move a camera lens from its resting
> position.
>From some past threads with this patch,
Hi!
> > > > I wonder... should we somehow expose the range of diopters to
> > > > userspace? I believe userland camera application will need that
> > > > information.
> > >
> > > It'd certainly be useful to be able to provide more information.
> > >
> > > The question is: where to store it, and
Hi Pavel,
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 09:09:09AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > On 02/15/17 00:47, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > On Tue 2017-02-14 14:20:22, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > >> Add a V4L2 control class for voice coil lens driver devices. These are
> > >> simple devices that are used to
Hi!
> On 02/15/17 00:47, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Tue 2017-02-14 14:20:22, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> >> Add a V4L2 control class for voice coil lens driver devices. These are
> >> simple devices that are used to move a camera lens from its resting
> >> position.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Sakari
Hi Pavel,
On 02/15/17 00:47, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Tue 2017-02-14 14:20:22, Sakari Ailus wrote:
>> Add a V4L2 control class for voice coil lens driver devices. These are
>> simple devices that are used to move a camera lens from its resting
>> position.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus
On Tue 2017-02-14 14:20:22, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Add a V4L2 control class for voice coil lens driver devices. These are
> simple devices that are used to move a camera lens from its resting
> position.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus
Looks good to me.
I wonder...
13 matches
Mail list logo