Re: exposing a large-ish calibration table through V4L2?

2018-02-14 Thread Hans Verkuil
On 14/02/18 13:27, Florian Echtler wrote: > Hello Hans, > > On 14.02.2018 13:13, Hans Verkuil wrote: >> >> On 14/02/18 13:09, Florian Echtler wrote: >>> >>> The internal device memory contains a table with two bytes for each sensor >>> pixel >>> (i.e. 960x540x2 = 1036800 bytes) that basically pro

Re: exposing a large-ish calibration table through V4L2?

2018-02-14 Thread Florian Echtler
Hello Hans, On 14.02.2018 13:13, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > On 14/02/18 13:09, Florian Echtler wrote: >> >> The internal device memory contains a table with two bytes for each sensor >> pixel >> (i.e. 960x540x2 = 1036800 bytes) that basically provide individual black and >> white levels per-pixel t

Re: exposing a large-ish calibration table through V4L2?

2018-02-14 Thread Hans Verkuil
Hi Florian, On 14/02/18 13:09, Florian Echtler wrote: > Hello Hans, > > I've picked up work on the sur40 driver again recently. There is one major > feature left that is currently unsupported by the Linux driver, which is the > hardware-based calibration. > > The internal device memory contains