Re: Dosemu won't load any other dos

2003-06-12 Thread Johan Gill
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 03:53:56PM -0400, Justin Zygmont wrote: you don;t give very much information. My daughter needed a diaper change :) Anyway, 'everything' means suggestions 2,3,5 from Bart. I'll try the other solutions when I get the time. Hmm, I wonder why 2,3,5 did not work. --

Re: Dosemu won't load any other dos

2003-06-12 Thread Johan Gill
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 08:13:10AM +0200, Johan Gill wrote: On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 03:53:56PM -0400, Justin Zygmont wrote: you don;t give very much information. My daughter needed a diaper change :) Anyway, 'everything' means suggestions 2,3,5 from Bart. I'll try the other solutions

Re: Problem with running custom hardware card, 1.1.5 seems to makeit worse...

2003-06-12 Thread Stas Sergeev
Hello. Barclay McInnes wrote: attempted communication, what ultimately got the card working was switching back to 1.1.4 and using the (previously unknown to me) fast flag. I Good. Still wondering why it is not a default. Although it would still make sense if you find the 1.1.4.x pre-release

Re: Problem with running custom hardware card, 1.1.5 seems to makeit worse...

2003-06-12 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi Stas, On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Stas Sergeev wrote: Downgrading is the worst fix ever possible. Not if it makes it work. You're starting to sound like a developer... :) 73, Ged. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-msdos in the body of a message to [EMAIL

Re: Dosemu won't load any other dos

2003-06-12 Thread Bart Oldeman
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Johan Gill wrote: On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 03:53:56PM -0400, Justin Zygmont wrote: you don;t give very much information. My daughter needed a diaper change :) Anyway, 'everything' means suggestions 2,3,5 from Bart. I'll try the other solutions when I get the time.

Re: Problem with running custom hardware card

2003-06-12 Thread Barclay McInnes
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Stas Sergeev wrote: Downgrading is the worst fix ever possible. I agree, and now that it's going, I will see what I can do to to determine where the break is, but the first priority was getting it to work at all. Getting it to work is a huge piece of that whole (finish

slight problem compiling

2003-06-12 Thread Jan Willem Stumpel
Compiling 1.1.5 fails; I get messages like lex.yy.c: In function `yy_get_next_buffer': lex.yy.c:3789: error: `yy_current_buffer' undeclared (first use in this function) lex.yy.c:3789: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in.) lex.yy.c: At top

Re: slight problem compiling

2003-06-12 Thread Bart Oldeman
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote: Compiling 1.1.5 fails; I get messages like lex.yy.c: In function `yy_get_next_buffer': lex.yy.c:3789: error: `yy_current_buffer' undeclared (first use in this function) lex.yy.c:3789: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once

commands with path

2003-06-12 Thread bbg
The command interpreter does not execute commands with full path e.g. [drive:]\[path]\command ex: c:\app\app[.exe] or \app\app[.exe] if the executable is not located in an directory from the path environment variable. This makes it impossible to launch a command located in another directory from

Re: slight problem compiling

2003-06-12 Thread Jan Willem Stumpel
Bart Oldeman wrote: On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote: Compiling 1.1.5 fails; I get messages like [..] I guess that your version of flex is too new. [..] downgrade your flex to 2.5.4 [..] It worked! Thanks! I mean the compiling. Haven't tested dosemu itself yet.. am going to do

Re: commands with path

2003-06-12 Thread Bart Oldeman
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, bbg wrote: The command interpreter does not execute commands with full path e.g. [drive:]\[path]\command ex: c:\app\app[.exe] or that does not work indeed. \app\app[.exe] this works for me. It looks like bin\app.exe is interpreted as bin \app.exe probably as a result

RE: Download Problem DOSEMU-1.1.5

2003-06-12 Thread Justin Zygmont
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Stas Sergeev wrote: Hello. Justin Zygmont wrote: I'm just suprised that sound doesn't seem to work properly, anyone else notice this? What card/driver? sb Try setting BUGGY_DRIVER_NEEDS_POST to 1 and see if your driver is buggy. doesn't seem to make any