On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 14:26:34 +0100
Jakub Klawiter wrote:
> $ echo test | lpr -l
> the printer starts to print immediately.
>
> But from dosemu if i'll try:
>
> C:>echo test > lpt1:
>
> it's working but there is 3-4 seconds lag before it starts to print.
> Where can i look to fix it?
That's
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 08:54:11 +0100
Hayen Iggena [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can get tame only for Windows. I'm using Linux.
http://www.tamedos.com/downloads/tame334a.zip
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 10:26:56 -
Tarquin Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I force all files created by any user in dosemu to be 'read and
write' enabled for all users or at least for users in the same group as the
creator?
Write a little script to load dosemu from and set a umask
I raised this issue on the Fedora mailing list as well as here and have
received a very interesting response.
See here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2007-November/msg02329.html
Mr. Boszormenyi apparently needed to apply a patch to the dosemu source tree in
order to get dosemu to
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:16:29 -0800 (PST)
Bryan J. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hence why I wrote a brief blog article here:
'What is x86-64? Long Mode memory model ...'
http://thebs413.blogspot.com/2005/10/what-is-x86-64-long-mode-memory-model.html
Thanks for that write-up. It's a
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 11:39:59 +1300
Bart Oldeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The question is how important the speed is, as most 16-bit programs
were written at a time when CPUs were natively slower than the
emulation speed now!
For me it's not a particularly big deal on my computer; all I do
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:39:15 -0600
Frank Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having just set this computer up with Fedora 8 x86_64, I am trying to compile
dosemu to run on it. Note that this is (for now) a pure x86_64 system --
there are no i386 libraries installed on it at all.
I got this figured
Having just set this computer up with Fedora 8 x86_64, I am trying to compile
dosemu to run on it. Note that this is (for now) a pure x86_64 system --
there are no i386 libraries installed on it at all.
When I download dosemu-1.4.0.tgz and do ./configure, make it appears to
complete ok. It
On Sat, 03 Nov 2007 10:10:11 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anybody who actually got wpdos 6.2 to run in DOSEMU?
This isn't of much help to you, but I use WP 5.1 and it works fine...
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 12:19:54 -0600
Frank Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems to me that there was another program that does pretty much the same
thing as TAME but without the send-money nag screen, i.e. a free program. But
I can't recall its name at the moment
I found it.
Here
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:33:44 -0300
Boscovich, Maximiliano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are running FoxPro compiled application and it really slow on performance.
I wonder if TAME would help.
It seems to me that there was another program that does pretty much the same
thing as TAME but without
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 16:56:46 -0600
Frank Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The short form of the story is that I can't have a symbolic link in
~/.dosemu/drive_c as part of an /etc/skel profile and have it actually work.
After further experimentation, I'm starting to think there is something more
I have had this happen before, but just now figured out exactly what's going on.
I still don't know why.
I create a user and run dosemu, then go into ~/.dosemu/drive_c and make a
symbolic link to another directory: ln -s /opt/data/test .
Now I have a link in ~/.dosemu/drive_c that goes to
Just make a symbolic link in ~/.dosemu/drive_c to point to a common directory.
For example:
mkdir /opt/dosstuff
ln -s /opt/dosstuff ~/.dosemu/drive_c/dosstuff
Set your permissions in /opt/dosstuff to whatever you want.
Now you can use cd dosstuff from a dos prompt within your dosemu window to
it to the list now in three parts and see if it gets
through this way.
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 22:53:09 -0600
From: Frank Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Roberto Bechtlufft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Multi-user and shared directories
On Thu
Looks like it's something in the last two paragraphs that causes the mailing
list server to reject my this message. I will reword it a bit to see if that
solves the problem.
Begin forwarded message:
You can create your frontend directly with the batchfile using choice.exe, or
you can write it
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:38:43 -0300
Roberto Bechtlufft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Suppose I have users roberto and fatima. roberto is under the groups
roberto and dosemu, and fatima is under fatima and dosemu. When I do a
chmod 002 and as roberto create a new file all users under the group
On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 09:49:57 +0300
Andris Pavenis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also compiled DosEmu-1.4.0 from source RPM on Fedora Core 6 and it
works OK. No serious problems detected.
As I just set up Fedora 7 on this computer, I decided to try compiling the
source RPM again with this setup
I use LTSP to run terminals off of Fedora Linux servers and run DOSEMU on those
terminals. (Some of you might be interested in my article about DOSEMU,
PowerBasic/DOS and LTSP: http://www.melvilletheatre.net/articles )
When I start DOSEMU on a terminal, I get this message:
QUOTE:
You do not
Has loadhi disappeared by accident or design in the latest dosemu rpm?
I can find it in dosemu-1.2.2-1.i386.rpm, but it's missing in 1.4.0-1.i386.rpm.
And if it's by design, is there a list of other dos commands that have been
removed or replaced for whatever reason?
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~
One more minor issue. This doesn't appear to be an actual problem, at least
not for what I'm trying to run at the moment.
However, when I first crank up dosemu, I get the message
UMB's unavailable!
dosemu XMS 3.0 driver installed.
dosemu EMS 4.0 driver installed.
This is using the stock
I attempted to post this question to this mailing list yesterday but the list's
spam filter seems a bit over-eager and it didn't appear to make it to the list.
If I post it again it will probably disappear once more, so I have posted my
questions at:
22 matches
Mail list logo
