Hello.
Bart Oldeman wrote:
>> functionality. Then you can safely
>> remove the "BUG" stuff I think.
> Yes, that looks like the proper fix to me.
We probably have to contact
Alberto to find out if his tests
are passed with that patches
because my testcase for the
"BUG" includes only FoxPro...
>>
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> Two attached patches implements that
> functionality. Then you can safely
> remove the "BUG" stuff I think.
Yes, that looks like the proper fix to me.
> Right, this is a main design problem
> of dosemu which is that the DPMI code
> is executed in the s
Hello.
Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
>> The only good thing here is that the amount of progs that works on
>> 486 but not on 386 is very minor...
> But how annoying when you run into one :-).
I really don't think it is a major
advantage to have an ability to
pass the first stage of NT install... :)
Stas Sergeev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I agree:(
> The only good thing here is that the amount of progs that works on
> 486 but not on 386 is very minor...
But how annoying when you run into one :-).
> Currently the "BUG" cannot be removed. Just set the $_cpu=(80486)
> and try to run FoxPr
