From: "Brock Noland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 20:30:58 -0600
> Is this going to be merged anytime soon?
If it gets submitted to the proper mailing list, it might.
'linux-net' is for user questions, it is not where the networking
developers hang out, 'netdev' is.
And you have to
You'll get a better set of eyes on this if you post it
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] which is where the networking
developers hang out.
linux-net is for user questions.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info
From: Li Zefan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:16:24 +0800
> compile error building without CONFIG_FS_PROC:
>
> net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c: In function 'fib_net_init':
> net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c:1032: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'fib_proc_
> init'
> net/ipv4/fib_frontend.
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:04:53 +0800
> In SMP, if a bridge fdb is being created when another CPU at the same time
> delete the bridge, this newly created fdb may incur a leakage:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (CC:'d) is the proper place to report
things like this.
'linux-net' is o
From: "Vladimir Kondratiev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:32:12 +0200
> Thus, I believe, for IP stack it is wise to have IP header aligned by
> drivers. I warn once, so it do not flood system log with messages.
It is wise only on systems that need it, and most can (albeit
expensiv
From: "Jeff Haran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 15:16:08 -0800
> I don't know of NICs that would support this.
Many NICs support multiple unicast MAC addresses, we even
have driver APIs for this in the Linux kernel.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-n
From: Gavin McCullagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:56:26 +
> I'm trying to hack together something which will run through the
> retransmit queue looking at the tcp headers.
The packets in the retransmit queue are headerless, the
header only gets added to clones of the retrans
From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:08:09 -0800
> Yes, doing UDP in user space is trivial.
Only if you also filter out the ICMP port unreachable's
the kernel is going to generate.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body
From: "Mateus Interciso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 08:58:41 -0200
> The main reason I'm reading this book is that my final paper on
> university is about the AntNet algorithm for routing, and I would VERY
> like to implement it
This is not a mailing list where you get help writing
From: Roel Kluin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 09:31:28 +0100
> I got this bug recently, I am not sure whether this is related to
> any previously reported ones. It was on a 2.6.24 or 2.6.24-rc1
> git-pulled kernel.
The network developers do no listen on this mailing list.
Please re
From: Kristian Evensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:54:37 +0200
> I have developed a small patch for the TCP code in 2.6.19 and it works
> flawlessly. A couple of days ago I decided to make it compatible with
> 2.6.22.5 and have stumbled upon a problem I cannot solve.
>
> In 2.
From: Gabriel Paubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:39:01 +0200
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 11:12:06AM +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> > A patch to restore pre-2.3.41 behaviour for IPv4 follows (and the
> > logic becomes much clearer IMO, not only because it avoids a goto),
> > bu
From: Bill Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 00:02:50 -0400
> I haven't done any comparisons with other vendor offerings, but I can
> highly recommend the Myricom PCI-Express (8x) 10-GigE NICs. They only
> cost about $900 and can do full unidirectional 10-GigE line rate. And
> as a
linux-net is for user questions and issues, developer discussion
and patches belong on netdev, thank you
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Any reason you're not sending this to the netfilter developer list
mentioned in MAINTAINERS, or it's chief maintainer Patrick McHardy?
NETFILTER/IPTABLES/IPCHAINS
P: Rusty Russell
P: Marc Boucher
P: James Morris
P: Harald Welte
P: Jozsef Kadlecsik
P: Patrick McHardy
From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:19:01 -0700
> It is a fine if that is how the distro chooses to do it.
> Is it part of the LSB?
It's even part of platform ELF ABI specifications.
> My preference is to get rid of the hard coded path and add an environment
>
From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 07:45:17 -0700
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:15:23 +0100
> "Oliver Cook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > In trying to run tc with netem to introduce latency in the lab on a
> > 64bit system I discovered the following bug
From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 08:54:52 +1000
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 03:06:53PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not able to bring an ethernet interface down and back up again
> > > with this if avahi-autoipd is installed on my Ubuntu boxes. I've seen
>
From: "Kiran Kumar Kella" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 11:41:22 +0530
> I am using linux version 2.6.14
>
> Appreciate your help on this problem.
Don't run such ancient kernels.
There were at least a dozen or more device refcount
leaks fixed since 2.6.14, any one of which could h
From: "Jeff Haran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 15:51:18 -0700
> OK, but my question remains. In the case where a device supports one set
> of speeds via autonegotiation and another set via forcing, how does one
> tell which speeds can be forced and which can be autonegotiated?
Unfor
From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 14:56:39 +0200
> Hirokazu Takahashi wrote:
> > TBF --- Simple Token Bucket Filter --- packet scheduler doesn't
> > work correctly with TSO on that it slows down to send out packets.
> > TSO packets will be discarded since the size ca
From: Detlef Vollmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 08:18:29 +0200
> I'd like to bind to 192.168.2.0, i.e. to the "ANY" address of that
> subnet.
BSD sockets never allowed binding to subnets.
Look, just end this thread, I'm not adding this stupid functionality.
You can bind to inad
You might have more luck on netdev@vger.kernel.org which is where
the kernel networking developers actually subscribe.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.
From: Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 07:49:48 +0300
> David Miller wrote:
> > From: Yanping Du <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > We got complaints on this Linux behavior, since
> > > customers feel it confusing, and don't want to see
&g
From: Yanping Du <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
> We got complaints on this Linux behavior, since
> customers feel it confusing, and don't want to see
> ICMP replies for an eth ifc if it's down.
We're not replying to the "eth interface" we're replying
to the IP
The networking developers read the netdev@vger.kernel.org mailing
list, not this one, so please send your report there, thank you.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/maj
From: Detlef Vollmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 07:52:56 +0100
> Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> >
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > > True, which in my case is 255.255.255.255 (local broadcast).
> > > (which is internally 0.0.0.0), but not if bound to 192.168.100.100
>
From: Joy Latten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 11:44:30 -0600
> This is similar to another bug reported last month.
> Here is the patch I sent out then. Please let me know
> how it goes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joy Latten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This whole interface is a complete mess.
Call
From: Joy Latten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 11:44:30 -0600
> This is similar to another bug reported last month.
> Here is the patch I sent out then. Please let me know
> how it goes.
>
> Regards,
> Joy
>
> Signed-off-by: Joy Latten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This one is my bad, I shou
From: Bill Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 01:57:53 -0500
> BTW, is it expected behavior that when I cat /proc/net/tcp, the
> local_address and rem_address are byte swapped on a little endian
> system (this just noticed on a 2.6.15.4 kernel)? They're not
> byte swapped on a big end
From: Bill Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 22:26:48 -0500
> That seems like a bug to me. I'm running a 2.6.15-rc5 kernel and
> my established TCP connections appear in /proc/net/tcp as expected.
> And I do have IPv6 enabled (as a module), although I am not actually
> using IPv6 for
From: suzuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 17:27:28 -0800
> But, the patch hasn't gone in and I am still seeing the problem on
> 2.6.19 :(.. I have tested this patch on 2.6.19 and if fixes the issue there.
The patch did go in, but it got reverted because I think it caused
problems.
From: Neil Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 14:45:53 -0500
> Back in 2.4 arp requests that were recevied by netpoll were processed in
> netconsole_receive_skb, where they were responded to using the src mac of the
> request sender. In the 2.6 kernel arp_reply is responsible for th
From: "Tim Wright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:19:39 -0800
> At the point where the system is responding, there should be no
> interfaces with the given IP address and ifconfig confirms this. The IP
> address is not associated with any interface and should not be
> associated wit
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 23:10:08 +0200 (IST)
> >
> > BTW, TCP will be significantly faster than UDP because with UDP you
> > incur an extra full context switch on every packet.
> >
>
> Could you elaborate on this a bit more? What kind of context switch?
TCP queues and take
35 matches
Mail list logo
