Linux-Networking Digest #793, Volume #9 Wed, 6 Jan 99 02:13:50 EST
Contents:
VPN with Linux (Eric Preston)
VPN with Linux (Eric Preston)
Re: PLEASE HELP !!! PLEASE HELP !!! (Randal)
Re: Post handshake PPP problem. (RH 5.2) (Warren Mira)
Re: When a packet hits a pocket..... ("H. P. Friedrichs")
Re: pppd not activating modem ("Lewis Foti")
samba mount problem (Eric Melville)
Linux still doesn't recognize my modem (Usman Abbasi)
BOOTPD and Vendor Specific Tags - Help! (Douglas E. Mitton)
Re: NT 4 and network problems ("Ghost Rider")
Re: When a packet hits a pocket..... (Troutman)
Re: Where's RedHat rc.inet1, rc.inet2 files?? (Stuart R. Fuller)
FYI: to anyone trying to get the second b channel to connect under linux ("Felix
Dominguez")
Re: Need driver for Netgear FA310TX NIC (Troutman)
Re: Simple Network (Kevin Martin)
3Com Megahertz 3CCFEM556BI and RedHat 5.2 - almost there (?) (tmf)
Re: can not see smbd/nmbd daemons running (David Graham)
Re: This ongoing flame-fest ("James E. Coleman")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Eric Preston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: VPN with Linux
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 22:41:22 -0500
Can anyone point me in the right direction for setting up a VPN with two
linux boxes? I vaguely recall something way back when about
linux<->linux encryption patches by some cypherpunk people, but don't
really remember much more than that.
thanks in advance.
------------------------------
From: Eric Preston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: VPN with Linux
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 22:41:50 -0500
Can anyone point me in the right direction for setting up a VPN with two
linux boxes? I vaguely recall something way back when about
linux<->linux encryption patches by some cypherpunk people, but don't
really remember much more than that.
thanks in advance.
------------------------------
From: Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PLEASE HELP !!! PLEASE HELP !!!
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 21:30:46 -0800
My, how pleasent. Spend much time with street kids do you?
On Tue, 05 Jan 1999, DG wrote:
>YOU AIN'T NO F****** BODY TO JUDGE LIKE THAT. DON'T EVER LET ME SEE
>YOU POST LIKE THAT OR I'LL KICK YOUR MF A** !!!
>
>On Tue, 05 Jan 1999 15:49:30 -0700, Bill Anderson
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>DG wrote:
>>>
>>> Stuff a pie in your face.
>>>
>>> On Fri, 01 Jan 1999 22:44:11 -0600, Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> <snip>
>>> >> DO NOT GIVE ME IRRELEVANT BULLSH**
>>> >> SUCH AS TELLING ME TO PARTITION MY OTHER HARD DRIVE. I WILL CONTINUE
>>> >> TO POST THIS MESSAGE UNTIL SOMEONE HELPS ME FIX THIS PROBLEM !!!
>>> >>
>>> >> Please post a reply to this message. I've had to switch ISPs in the
>>> >> past due to people spamming and framing my acount(s).
>>> >>
>>
>>Given the nature of your posts, I would venture to say it would likely
>>that your acocunt was cancelled for abuse.
>>
>>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >
>>> > using umsdos might be your ticket...
>>> >
>>> >i agree with doug 'n darren... the tone of your posts does tend discourage the
>help
>>> >you're seeking...
>>> >
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 21:13:33 -0800
From: Warren Mira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Post handshake PPP problem. (RH 5.2)
Andy Pohl wrote:
> Hi.
>
> My modem's OK. It dials OK. It handshakes (like the typical handshake noise
> for 33.6) OK. But after that, I don't know what goes on. Usernet will stay
> yellow, it redials, and tries again. I tested this with Minicom, and it
> would start a mode where strange characters would be sent in small clusters.
what comes first....those strange characters or the login prompt...If the answer
is those strange characters..then your ISP is using PAP.
>
> I have made the chat using linuxconf like:
>
> Expect: ogin:
> Send: <login>
> Expect: assword:
> Send: <password>
> Expect: lip-server>
> Send: ppp
> Expect: TIMEOUT
> Send: 5
> Expect: ~--
>
> I don't know if I need to bother with PAP authentication, because I don't know
> what that is. I can't seem to find any logs that would tell me what happened
> to the connection...
$ tail -f /var/log/messages
> what are the names of them? If I'm leaving anything out,
> feel free to ask me anything else since I'm sure I'm not telling the whole
> story.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Andy
hopes this helps....
------------------------------
From: "H. P. Friedrichs" <" HPeter.Friedrichs"@alliedsignal.com>
Subject: Re: When a packet hits a pocket.....
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 12:58:27 -0700
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This may be relevant to you: Linux Router Project
http://www.psychosis.com/linux-router/
Pete
Troutman wrote:
>
> Matt Kressel wrote:
> > Firstly, the minimum TCP/IP packet size is 40 bytes (IP header + TCP
> > header), so I guess you mean just the data. At 20,000 packets per
> > second with a minimum of say 60 bytes per packet, thats 1,200,000 or
> > over a megabyte per second.
>
> Yes - data is what I was referring to.
>
> > Seems like a router is what you really need here, but since you asked...
> >
> > Things to make sure you have:
> >
> > 1) 100 MHz CPU bus - a must
> > 2) 100 MHz SDRAM - a must
> > 3) 100 MHz ethernet card
>
> Yes! Yes! Yes! All are a must have!
>
> > Things to do with the kernel:
> >
> > 1) Optimize as router not host
> > 2) Remove ALL unneccessary drivers
> > 3) Turn OFF IP accounting and packet logging.
> >
> > Thridly, I must ask: Why use a machine as a router? You do not gain
> > anything by converting a machine into a router. A dedicated piece of
> > hardware would most certainly do a better job. After all the packet has
> > to come in over ethernet, decoded, passed through the kernel, recoded
> > and passed over the next ethercard. Not to mention arp lookups. Seems
> > like a router would do you a world of good. If you need the logging,
> > then use a passive host, sniffing the network. In almost all cases, a
> > dedicated piece of hardware will do you better than software for this
> > type of thing.
>
> The goal is flexibility in an inexpensive package. We are bringing an
> 11Mb link in via microwave to the facility. The microwave is just an
> ethernet bridge. It makes sense to use a Linux box routing ether to
> ether. I can run packet filtering, anon ftp and DNS at the IPX where it
> will not suck up my bandwidth. If the kernel can handle the traffic
> flow, which I hope it can, it would replace the need for an expensive
> dedicated router that would not run DNS or anon ftp. It would also be a
> familar interface with plenty of troubleshooting and packet sniffing
> options.
>
> I am trying to find a source for real world routed performance
> measures. If anyone has any links, please pass them on!
>
> Thanks for the input. It is appreciated =)
------------------------------
From: "Lewis Foti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: pppd not activating modem
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 22:15:01 -0000
What device is pppd trying to use? If it is /dev/modem this is a symlink to
one of the serial ports. It is worth checking that it pointing to the
correct port for the new modem.
regards
Lewis
T.L. (Terry) Branscombe wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I recently changed my modem from a 14.4 with an onboard com port to a
>freebie no-name 28.8 PnP. I installed and configured isapnp using pnpdump
>info and had minicom and seyon up and running no problem, and at the right
>speed. Since I did not (at least initially) alter my options files and
>chat scripts, I assume pppd is having trouble finding the PnP modem.
>
>If anyone can suggest things to try, I'd really appreciate it.
>
>--
>+------------------+
>Terrence Branscombe
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Eric Melville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: samba mount problem
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 22:14:44 GMT
i've got linux and 95 machines networked together nicely... samba is
working great and everything, but i've got this other problem with
smb... whenever i use smbmount, it "seems" to work just fine, but after
a minute or two, directories on the mounted share start disappearing...
any ideas?
-E
------------------------------
From: Usman Abbasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux still doesn't recognize my modem
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 22:55:06 -0600
Thanks, that was a stupid mistake about not running as root. I tried
using
pnpdump and it told me no devices were found. I still get an error with
dip.
Here is the new errors when I run dip. I don't think I have a
winmodem. The
manual says it can run in dos. Like I said, it is configured in Windows
NT
for COM 3. Tell me if there is any more information I should include.
Thanks, any help will be greatly appreciated. I have found cua2 under
/dev.
DIP: name=root home=/tmp
host=localhost IP=127.0.0.1
prot=SLIP MTU=296
Modem set to "HAYES".
>> chatkey NO\sCARRIER 4
Added chat response keyword 'NO CARRIER' with code '4'
>> chatkey NO\sDIALTONE 5
Added chat response keyword 'NO DIALTONE' with code '5'
>> chatkey BUSY 6
Added chat response keyword 'BUSY' with code '6'
>> port cua2
PORT: terminal port set to "cua2".
DIP: tty_open: /dev/cua2 (4) DIP: tty_open: IBUF=1024 OBUF=1020
DIP: tty: get_state: Input/output error
DIP: tty_open: cannot get current state!
Usman
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Douglas E. Mitton)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux
Subject: BOOTPD and Vendor Specific Tags - Help!
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 22:25:15 GMT
Help! :-)
Has anyone had experience with BOOTP server and Vendor specific tags?
I have to get this working with a propriatary server in my test
network. I have to pass a boolean (no leading length byte) flag to
the client to load a special load file format.
Specifically I want to include a :T113: parameter in the bootptab file
BUT bootpd generates a syntax error.
I obtained the newest version from Sunsite, it describes this option
BUT it refuses to parse it.
I would appreciate any pointers on this. Tomorrow I will capture the
EXACT error response BUT it is just a generic syntax message ... no
specific number or reference.
This same bootpd setup works perfectly with other servers with no
problem, that is ones that don't require the vendor specific tag.
Thanks in advance for any assistance.
================================================
Doug Mitton - Brockville, Ontario, Canada
'City of the Thousand Islands'
Amateur Radio: VE3DMZ ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cybertap.com/dmitton
SPAM Reduction: Remove "x." from my domain.
================================================
------------------------------
From: "Ghost Rider" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: nz.comp
Subject: Re: NT 4 and network problems
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 19:12:15 +1300
Peter wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
>Not surprising, netbeui is a very small, very fast protocol. Major problem
>is its not routable so it will only work in local LANS but apart from that,
>its ok.
>Peter
>(Nearly an MSCE)
>
You forgot the bit about broadcast storms as the number of machines
increase.
Anything more than 6-8 machines, and I always use TCP/IP. Also has the bonus
of a relatively quick and painless transition to WAN.
Cheers,
Gordon Smith MCP
------------------------------
From: Troutman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: When a packet hits a pocket.....
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 17:28:53 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks - thats exactly what I was looking for!
"H. P. Friedrichs" wrote:
>
> This may be relevant to you: Linux Router Project
>
> http://www.psychosis.com/linux-router/
>
> Pete
>
> Troutman wrote:
> >
> > Matt Kressel wrote:
> > > Firstly, the minimum TCP/IP packet size is 40 bytes (IP header + TCP
> > > header), so I guess you mean just the data. At 20,000 packets per
> > > second with a minimum of say 60 bytes per packet, thats 1,200,000 or
> > > over a megabyte per second.
> >
> > Yes - data is what I was referring to.
> >
> > > Seems like a router is what you really need here, but since you asked...
> > >
> > > Things to make sure you have:
> > >
> > > 1) 100 MHz CPU bus - a must
> > > 2) 100 MHz SDRAM - a must
> > > 3) 100 MHz ethernet card
> >
> > Yes! Yes! Yes! All are a must have!
> >
> > > Things to do with the kernel:
> > >
> > > 1) Optimize as router not host
> > > 2) Remove ALL unneccessary drivers
> > > 3) Turn OFF IP accounting and packet logging.
> > >
> > > Thridly, I must ask: Why use a machine as a router? You do not gain
> > > anything by converting a machine into a router. A dedicated piece of
> > > hardware would most certainly do a better job. After all the packet has
> > > to come in over ethernet, decoded, passed through the kernel, recoded
> > > and passed over the next ethercard. Not to mention arp lookups. Seems
> > > like a router would do you a world of good. If you need the logging,
> > > then use a passive host, sniffing the network. In almost all cases, a
> > > dedicated piece of hardware will do you better than software for this
> > > type of thing.
> >
> > The goal is flexibility in an inexpensive package. We are bringing an
> > 11Mb link in via microwave to the facility. The microwave is just an
> > ethernet bridge. It makes sense to use a Linux box routing ether to
> > ether. I can run packet filtering, anon ftp and DNS at the IPX where it
> > will not suck up my bandwidth. If the kernel can handle the traffic
> > flow, which I hope it can, it would replace the need for an expensive
> > dedicated router that would not run DNS or anon ftp. It would also be a
> > familar interface with plenty of troubleshooting and packet sniffing
> > options.
> >
> > I am trying to find a source for real world routed performance
> > measures. If anyone has any links, please pass them on!
> >
> > Thanks for the input. It is appreciated =)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stuart R. Fuller)
Subject: Re: Where's RedHat rc.inet1, rc.inet2 files??
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 05:00:03 GMT
Vincent ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: The Slackware distrubution has the following files for building an
: Intranet:
:
: /etc/HOSTNAME
: /etc/hosts
: /etc/host.conf
: /etc/resolv.conf
: /etc/rc.d/rc.inet1
: /etc/rc.d/rc.inet2.
:
: The RedHat 5.1 distrubution has all of the above, except for:
:
: /etc/resolv.conf
: /etc/rc.d/rc.inet1
: /etc/rc.d/rc.inet2
:
: I cannot find these 3 files anywhere in the RedHat distribution. Where
: would these files be in RedHat 5.1?
/etc/resolv.conf is not included in the Redhat distribution. Rather, it is
built during installation time or at network [re]configuration time.
The other two files (rc.inet[12]) are not used in the Redhat distribution.
They just have a different way of doing those activities performed by
rc.inet[12].
And, for all you others responding with guesses, like "Try using find", etc.
Please, if you don't know the answer to a question, posting guesses and other
nonsense just wastes people's time.
Stu
------------------------------
From: "Felix Dominguez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FYI: to anyone trying to get the second b channel to connect under linux
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 16:25:27 -0600
i read a document somewhere (sorry i forget the url)
that stated "Multilink PPP is only compatible with PAP"
so if you isp doesnt support PAP well your not SOL but ill tell you one
thing simple text authintacation is not gonna work
if you cant to connect both b-channels
if you have a 3comImpactIQ setup it up under windows95/98 for 64kbs per
channel and multilink enabled
if you dont have windows its ats60=64s80=1
s60=64 sets your rate to 64kbps
and
s80=1 enables Multilink PPP
i hope this helps someone
i spent 18 hours searching for a lot of info and trying out many ideas and
thats what works...
again in summary
Im using PAP as my authintacation protocol
i setup my 3comImpactIQ in windows so my init string is just AT&FH0
and to dial atd#######
good luck to all
its been fun
felix
------------------------------
From: Troutman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Need driver for Netgear FA310TX NIC
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 17:22:59 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don't do it. Lots of probs using FA310TX with D1 Chipset. Check the
dejanews archives for FA310TX and Linux ;-/
Art Mollet wrote:
>
> Netgear has a nice little starter kit for about
> $85.00 at CompUSA. Has anyone used this for RedHat 5.2?
> It uses FA310TX NIC cards.
>
> Does anyone have a better suggestion? I want to run Linux
> on one box, and let my wife run NT on the other box ( which
> also has a removable disk so that I can sometimes run Linux
> on it too).
>
> Happy New Year to all.
> Thanks,
> Art Mollet
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kevin Martin)
Subject: Re: Simple Network
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 05:03:19 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, it says
MegaSurge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Could somebody tell me the simplest way to set up four linux systems on a
>network? I have a hub and working network cards in each machine. The
>kernel is compiled with the network cards and other protocols necessary.
>But I'm not sure what to do as far as assignments and host files. Thanks
>for help.
First, grab the Networking HOW-TO -- it's probably on your disk somewhere
(look for /usr/doc/HOWTO -- it's full of .gz files you can view with zcat:
zcat /usr/doc/HOWTO/NET-3-HOWTO.gz | less
Here's a little clipping from it:
"The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) has reserved the
following three blocks of the IP address space for private networks:
10.0.0.0 - 10.255.255.255
172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255
192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255"
So you could assign private addresses to your four machines as 192.168.0.1
through 192.168.0.3 (and still have room for another 249 machines!) Create
an /etc/hosts file on each machine -- here's a piece of mine:
127.0.0.1 localhost
192.168.0.2 cannon cannon
192.168.0.3 mortar mortar
192.168.0.1 bazooka bazooka
192.168.0.6 howie howie
You could call yours moe, larry, curly, and shemp -- that's half the fun,
making up a naming scheme. Each Stooge corresponds to that machine's own
HOSTNAME. That gets set early in the boot process -- look for a file
/etc/HOSTNAME (there is a snip of code that reads that file and assigns its
contents to the $HOSTNAME variable).
Okay, you should now be able to "ping" each of the other machines with
little ado. Log on to moe and enter "ping curly" -- press ctrl-C to stop
pinging. The HOWTO will give you more information.
--
Kevin Martin No-spam zone.
<brasscannon No prisoners. No warning shots.
@usa.net>
------------------------------
From: tmf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.portable,comp.sys.laptops
Subject: 3Com Megahertz 3CCFEM556BI and RedHat 5.2 - almost there (?)
Date: 5 Jan 1999 19:43:41 GMT
Hi folks,
I have gathered some experience with the Tecra 8000 and the 3Com
Megahertz 3CCFEM556BI, but I'm not
that far that I got it actually working... :-(
History: I compiled a new kernel with PCMCIA updated sources from
RedHat/updates (kernel 2.0.36). I
also compiled the debug tools from the PCMCIA package, including the
X-based cardinfo tool (very
nice BTW).
At first, I noticed from the kernel logs that the PCMCIA controller
could see the card, but didn't
know how to handle it. Essentially, I could load the 3c574_cs module,
but executing
/etc/rc.d/init.d/network start came back with the message "Delayed eth0
initialization" (or
something similar). I then added the following entry in
/etc/pcmcia/config (thanks to Johan
Beckers):
card "3Com/Megahertz 3CCFEM556BI Ethernet/Modem"
manfid 0x0101, 0x0556
bind "3c574_cs" to 0, "serial_cs" to 1
which made the controller see the card. I can now actually start the
network, and ifconfig tells me:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:86:30:A5:C4
inet addr:10.10.0.51 Bcast:10.10.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:9 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:9
collisions:0
Interrupt:3 Base address:0x300
Unfortunately, here's where it stops. I can see the light on the network
connector of the card, but
no connection. I managed to do a telnet session once, actually, but
never again. (I can't quite
recall the exact "procedure", I remember stopping the network, unloading
the modules, do a "cardctl
eject; cardctl insert" and restarting the network, but I never managed
to bring the network back to
life again later).
Any other similar experiences? I learnt from the newsgroups that the
3c574_cs driver is a bit dodgy,
but is not working one of the symptoms? :-)
Also, how would I have to try the modem out: in the cardinfo (or cardctl
ident output) I only see
eth0, no cuax or ttySx interface. Do I have to make a symlink to
something? (I do have the serial
port enabled using IRQ4, so that should be /dev/cua0, right?)
I also think the modem functionality is not detected: "cardctl ident"
gives
Socket 0:
no product info available
Socket 1:
product info: "3Com", "Megahertz 3CCFEM556BI", "A", "001"
manfid: 0x0101, 0x0556
function: 6 (network)
^^^^^^^^^^^
I noticed there exists a file /etc/pcmcia/cis/3CXEM556.dat ; from the
PCMCIA
howto I understand this is a file that somehow makes up for defencies in
the card reporting its
functionality, no? -- Is it necessary for this card?
Another strange thing is that the card manager doesn't seem to recognise
when I remove the
network connector. It does make a sound when I remove or attach the
modem connector though.
Before the card manager also didn't beep when I removed or inserted the
card. Adding the
"cs_irq=<irq no.>" directive to /etc/sysconfig/pcmcia solved that
problem.
Tx
Filip Schepers
------------------------------
From: David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: can not see smbd/nmbd daemons running
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 10:05:38 -0500
Check the error log. As a guess, it will tell you what is wrong in
smb.conf that is preventing the daemons from starting.
On my machine, error log = /var/log/httpd.error_log, and
smb.conf = /etc/smb.conf. I think those are both non-standard,
compiled-in paths (I have forgotten now how they got there),
but the names and/or paths should be close enough to help you
find them on your machine.
If the log tells you nothing, then perhaps the startup script is
not finding the daemons (wrong path/filename/typo).
Good luck.
David Graham
>
> I am trying to configure my PII (windows98) as client and P133 (RH 5.2
> Linux)as a server using samba. I am able to ping/telnet the linux machine
> from windows and vice versa. But I am unable to "browse" Linux machine from
> windows.
>
> I am running smbd and nmbd daemons manually using /etc/rc.d/init.d/smb script.
> After running smb script I do not see smbd or nmbd process running ( ps aux |
> grep smbd/nmbd does not report anything). smbd is called with -D option and
> nmbd is called using -D and -G my_group options.
>
> Any thoughts as to why I these daemons are not running in background ???
>
------------------------------
From: "James E. Coleman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: This ongoing flame-fest
Date: 6 Jan 1999 01:12:01 -0600
Moriarty wrote:
>
> Hey all...
>
<<<<SNIP>>>>
>
> I hope that DG and anyone else who reads this message will send me some
> feedback on this, whether good or bad... I welcome all opinions - good, bad,
> indifferent, or completely new fresh ones... :)
>
> Thank you for your time and for your attentive patience... Take care, and
> have a good day...
>
> Moriarty
I missed the flame war, thank goodnes, but wholeheartedly agree with
your words, Moriarty. Hope they helped.
--
Jim Coleman
jecoleman@*NOSPAM*upsala.org
Powered by Linux
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
