Linux-Networking Digest #534, Volume #11 Mon, 14 Jun 99 22:14:23 EDT
Contents:
Server manager and SAMBA server (Greg Leblanc)
Questions on NAT (Same address on both sides) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: timeout on telnet login (Lee Allen)
Re: Rules of thumb for posting (Was: afpfs can be found here...) ("Kevin Cullis")
Re: NE2000 on Redhat 6.0 (Kenyon Ralph)
diald latest version ("Chris Barton")
Two nic's and diff. apps on each? (Josh Owens)
Re: Direct Connect Linux&Win ?? ("dpc")
Samba + PPP / Dialup (root)
neighbour table (Sven Steinberg)
Re: Help needed with modem (Denny)
Re: how to use libpcap (Michael Fuhr)
Re: Dual NIC Help Please (Aris Cruz)
Re: NO CARRIER (Todd Graham)
Re: linux printing to "networked" serial printer (L J Bayuk)
@home connection? (brooks dobbs)
Intel EE PRO/100 Intelligent Server? (Rick Warner)
Could you use a few extra dollars? (me)
Re: Sendmail POP (Chip Transisto)
Re: VPN through IP Masq (James Peterson)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Greg Leblanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.smb,linux.samba,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Server manager and SAMBA server
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 21:45:54 GMT
Hi there! I've got an NT network, to which I've just added a SAMBA
server. It's a CD-ROM tower with 28 CD's, that I've asked a couple of
other questions about. That shouldn't really make any difference for
this question, though. The version of the samba RPM on this server is
samba-2.0.3-8. I've noticed that when I go to the Server Manager and
bring up the properties for this server, it gives me some statistics,
but they seem a little bogus. I've always got 1 session open, with no
files open or locked, and zero named pipes. This is always the case,
even when I go and open a file on one of those shares for editing,
server manager still only reports the one dummy_user session. Should
this work at all, and if it should, then can anybody help me fix it?
I'll upgrade to 2.04b if that will help as soon as I find some RPMS for
it. Thanks,
Greg
--
It's pronounced "sexy" not "scuzzy"!
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Questions on NAT (Same address on both sides)
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 16:42:17 GMT
Can you use NAT to turn your Linux box into a router?
If I put aliases to every address on my internal network on eth0, can I
push that out eth1 (where the real network is)?
I currently am running unprotected and want to force a firewall
in between my local network and our internet router. But I need to do
this without effected our address setup. We have webservers, DNS, chat
... with real IP's pointing at our Internet router, and the outside
world pointing to us.
If I can't do this, what is my best fix? I can't get in the internet
router, we have a full "C" address space. Router is ?.?.?.1 and all
local servers point to it.
I could change the default gateway off local devices and point them the
the internal (eth1) of my Linux box, but how do I get requests from eth0
-> eth1?
TIA
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lee Allen)
Subject: Re: timeout on telnet login
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 15:03:45 GMT
I finally looked at the source for /bin/login, and there is a
hard-coded 60 second timeout. I am now convinced there is absolutely
no way to defeat this behaviour without hacking /bin/login.
-Lee Allen
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 18:07:18 -0600
From: "Kevin Cullis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.appletalk
Subject: Re: Rules of thumb for posting (Was: afpfs can be found here...)
Rob and Bjorn,
Thanks for the comments. While I'm not a newbie, there are things which are
learned over time and then may have been forgotten and need reinforcement.
Even as old as I am, my mother sometimes has to remind me of my manners
(hey, I even slip occassionally). But this is one areas which I was not
aware of, but now am fully informed.
Having lived in Germany for 3 years, I'd forgetten about the by minute
charge. Thanks, Rod, for reminding me.
The reason I posted the afpfs binary is because I was afraid that the
software would be lost (there have been a few postings which could not find
it anywhere). This is the ONLY site I have found it and I'm in the process
of trying to put it on my web site to keep it alive for others to contribute
to. So there was a good reason for doing it, just not economical for others
in other countries. I apologize for this inconvinence, but I was concerned
that work having been done would be lost for good and I for one don't like
to rework anything.
Bjorn, we both learned something today and we're both better for it.
Kevin
Denver, CO USA
==========
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rod Smith) wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Bjørn Ruberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> 2. Attaching a binary file to the posting; Personally I have no problem
>> with that as I am now connected to a LAN, but when trying to read news
>> connected through a modem, large attachments virtually killed the
>> transfers. And there are still a lot of modem/ISDN users in the world.
>> The rule of thumb is that binaries should never be posted, unless in
>> dedicated newsgroups (usually something with .binaries in the NG name)
>> so that people know what they might end up downloading. Instead, include
>> a URL to where the file is to be found, so that those who want this file
>> might download it themselves.
>
> Some additional points that are closely related to this one:
>
> 1) Many people (including, I understand, most Europeans who use modems to
> access the Internet) pay for net access per unit time. Binaries will
> increase the total net access time, thus costing those people, in total,
> substantial amounts of money, especially if they've got their systems
> configured to auto-download the entire contents of a newsgroup each
> night or some such.
> 2) Some smaller ISPs, or people who run news servers locally, may have
> problems if large numbers of binaries (or even just one or two
> particularly large binaries) suddenly appear in a text-only newsgroup.
> Thus, posting binaries to a newsgroup could potentially cause some ISPs
> to drop that newsgroup from their servers.
>
> These two reasons are both pretty serious, and for this reason, tolerance
> to violation of this rule does tend to be pretty low. I haven't checked
> them out even remotely recently, but I'm sure the no-binaries rule is
> discussed in regular postings to the news.newusers.questions and/or
> news.announce.newusers newsgroups. Most newsreaders will automatically
> subscribe a person to these or other similar newsgroups the first time
> they're launched. I think most newbies to Usenet News ignore these
> groups, but they shouldn't.
>
> --
> Rod Smith
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.channel1.com/users/rodsmith
> NOTE: Remove the "uce" word from my address to mail me
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kenyon Ralph)
Subject: Re: NE2000 on Redhat 6.0
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 18:22:08 GMT
On Sun, 13 Jun 1999 18:24:16 +0300, Eran Dvey-Aharon wrote:
> 2. After installation , how can I get to those selection menus once again?
netcfg
--
Kenyon Ralph | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://home.san.rr.com/ralphs
------------------------------
From: "Chris Barton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: diald latest version
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 01:06:56 +0100
what the latest version of diald
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 20:00:14 -0400
From: Josh Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: onenet.quake
Subject: Two nic's and diff. apps on each?
Ok, here is the situation I am in. I have two nic cards in my server.
One has the ip addy of 172.20.0.10 (eth0) the other is 172.20.0.11
(eth1). I would like to set up all incoming file/web server info to go
to the 172.20.0.10 card, while all the Quake stuff uses the
172.20.0.11. I know that I can do this by setting my machine as the DNS
for the network (I am using DHCP, so not hard to do) setting soga to
172.20.0.10 so when ppl on the network type in http://soga it will bring
up apache via eth0 (172.20.0.10). No big deal, I can handle that. Now
how in the world do I specify for quake to be using eth1? That is where
I get lost. I will be running a p166 (mxx) with 64 megs of ram. It has
two pci Netgear 310 (10/100) cards. Will I cut down on latency by using
two nic's or is my pci bus just not fast enough. I will be running
between 2-4 quake servers. There will be between 12-40 ppl on the
network at any givin time playing quake or downloading files off my
server. The three servers will have a 10/100 cisco switch, while the
rest of the hubs will plus into the switch. Will this setup prevent file
traffic from slowing down my quake traffic? If so, how do I do it
(forcing quake to use eth1). If not, is there another way to do
something similar?
Many thanks to anyone who can answer any of my questions.
Josh Owens
P.S. Two more notes:
1) I am running Redhat 6.0
2) There is a LAN party this saturday 19th/sunday 20th (sleeping over)
it will be in the Millville, Ohio area, Quake and Half-life will be the
main games (some starcraft) or anything else you can find someone else
to play. If you are interested please contact Me, Josh Owens at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or (513) 829-5988 or Ed Hensley at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or (513) 737-6778. Hope you can join us (if we can get 12 ppl, it will
be $10)
------------------------------
From: "dpc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Direct Connect Linux&Win ??
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 14:38:44 -0400
> 2: One box (the Win98/NT/Linxu) has a modem (home from school for the
summer
> :-( hehe) and I want to be able to access the internet from the box w/o a
> modem through that direct connect I have between the two NIC cards.
Nevermind about the question above. I've found enough info on ipmasq to see
what I need to do. However, most of the info I've seen has the computers on
an LAN. And especially any of the solutions for windows machines being the
server and linux as the client. hrmph :\ I don't have one set up at home,
I just want to be able to do this through the direct connection. Possible?
How, please. ;o) Thanks again
dpc
------------------------------
From: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Samba + PPP / Dialup
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 15:26:49 +0100
Reply-To: `
hi there,
I'm trying to setup my linux machine (running RedHat 5.0) as a PPP
Server so that I can dial in from a Windows machine else where and then
map a network drive using Samba. I have had some measure of success
with the PPP server side..i.e I can get windows to connect and ping the
machine, but am unsure about the windows file sharing side of things.
My questions are,
1) Is this possible,
2) If so, how do I go about it.
Many thanks in advance
Neil.
------------------------------
From: Sven Steinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: neighbour table
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 17:16:52 +0200
Hello,
i=B4ve got a PC with three network devices. The System is linux based
(Kernel 2.2.5.).
sometimes i get the following error message:
neighbour table overflow
does somebody know anything about this table? I=B4ve already tried to get=
some information bout found nothing.
I=B4ve looked up the source code and found something in the routing
sources!
Because i am not very good in reading c-Code, i put this question in
this group.
so i want to know what function does the neighbour table has? =
All informations are welcome
Thanks
Sven
-- =
BETEILIGE DICH AN DER PETITION GEGEN SPAM =
http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/
------------------------------
From: Denny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help needed with modem
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 14:54:02 -0400
Nigel Feltham wrote:
> Hi,
> I have just installed suse linux v6.1 on my pc and am unable to make linux
> see my my internal isa pnp modem. Using a ms-dos pnp setup utility, I set
> the modem to it's default settings of port 2e8, irq 10 but linux detects the
> modem as being at 2e8, irq 3 which is incorrect.
I was successful by adding the setserial ttySx irq x line in my rc.local file.
Denny
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Fuhr)
Subject: Re: how to use libpcap
Date: 14 Jun 1999 07:27:07 -0600
cai yibo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> who can tell me how to use libpcap to write a "snoop"?
You might want to see if tcpdump will suit your needs:
ftp://ftp.ee.lbl.gov/
> where can I find useful documents about how to use libpcap?
> are there any famous programs which use libpcap?
Tcpdump.
--
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/
------------------------------
From: Aris Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Dual NIC Help Please
Date: 14 Jun 1999 14:30:46 GMT
Question? Did recompile your kernel for support your NIC. Also, what
kind of nic. I have had problems with 2.0.36 and etherexpress16 and
recompiling the kernel helped. How about putting your some more info like
the cards you are using, did you recompile the kernel, cable modem or DSL?
Aris
Ron Cordell wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a 2.0.36 kernel (RH5.2) and 2 ethernet cards. One is set to
> 192.168.1.1, the other to 209.186.14.64. The route table shows entries
for
> both cards and the default gateway as 209.186.14.1 (the gateway on the
> internet part of the net).
>
> I can ping both IP addresses from the machine. I can ping all internal
> network addresses of 192.168.1.x, but I can't ping an address like
> 209.186.14.1, or 209.186.12.2 (the DNS). Shouldn't I be able to ping
these
> addresses if the route information is set correctly? The mask for both
cards
> is set to 255.255.255.0.
>
> Any help would be wonderful.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ron Cordell
>
>
>
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: Todd Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NO CARRIER
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 23:22:00 GMT
I'm not sure on the "NO CARRIER" message, but you can go to the sbin
directory "cd /sbin" from the command line and then type "./ifconfig -
a" to see what your connections are. The first should be loopback and
then the ppp connection should be there if you are connected.
You may want to try "usenet" to get the ppp connection - good luck!
In article <wwc93.433$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"newb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can connect to my ISP(gte.net) but after awhile(around 2 min) my
modem
> hangs up giving me NO CARRIER message.
>
> My ISP was able to give me an IP. I'm using minicom to dial and every
> configuration was done in X environment. BTW, how do I know if I have
named
> running and ppp running. Do I need this in order to connect. I know
what's
> it mean by those two(named and ppp) at least in theory. I have pppd
running,
> is this ppp service? Are ppp and pppd the same?
>
> TIA
>
> Leon
>
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (L J Bayuk)
Subject: Re: linux printing to "networked" serial printer
Date: 15 Jun 1999 01:36:51 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Any idea's how I would print to a serial printer on a Digital Terminal
>Server 300 from Linux (ultimately from W95 machines through Samba)? The
>terminal server has been given an IP address and I'm restricted to using TCP
>port numbers 2001-2016. Through Digial's OpenVMS I can find the printer by
>setting up a telnet print queue to "172.16.1.242:2016"
>
>I can get to the printer from Linux using the Perl script detailed in the
>Linux "Printing HOWTO", but can't from lpr. I assume this is because I
>can't specify the port as 2016 in lpr. I've checked into "rlpr" a little
>since this program does allow the specifing of specific TCP ports, but
>haven't had much success here (I do get a printout, but seems to be part of
>a setup script, not the actual print file). And anyway since "rlpr" doesn't
>use the printcap file would it work through Samba?
>
>The question is which tact should I pursue? lpr, rlpr, or TCP direct
>through Perl? Lpr seems to be the most conventional. Am I missing
>something here for getting the right port number?
>From your "setting up a telnet print queue to...", it seems to
me that the printer/terminal server combination doesn't talk
"BSD lpd protocol". (That is, there is more to it then just getting the
IP address and port right; you have to be speaking the same protocol.)
That rules out rlpr, and also rules out lpr with the rm=/rp= options.
You might still be able to use lpr, if you make a printcap entry
with an "if=" (or maybe of=?) filter entry that runs a program or
script which talks to the printer. If I'm on the right track, you
might want to start by using a network monitor to check what goes
between VMS and the printer - is it really telnet?
------------------------------
From: brooks dobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: @home connection?
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 01:39:42 GMT
has anyone used linux with @home's cable modems? if so any advice?
thanks,
brooks
------------------------------
From: Rick Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Intel EE PRO/100 Intelligent Server?
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 18:18:55 -0700
Anyone know if the Intel EtherExpress PRO/100 Intelligent Server card
works. The HOWTO points to an EEPRO driver page that says the
driver should work with cards using the i82557; the intelligent server
card does use that chip and an i960. But nothing to say whether it
really works or not
= rick warner
------------------------------
Crossposted-To:
tw.bbs.comp.linux,comp.sys.ibm.pc.soundcard.tech,uk.comp.misc,comp.robotics.misc,comp.lang.basic.visual,comp.sys.psion.misc,es.rec.juegos.comp.arcade
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (me)
Subject: Could you use a few extra dollars?
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 14:50:56 GMT
Not so long ago I was living my life from paycheck to paycheck desperately
trying to save money for my future. Just when I thought I was at the end of my
rope I came across this article-I simply followed the instructions and the
results have been fantastic!!!
Are you constantly running across articles like this on message
boards,newsgroups,etc? If so the reason you are is because THIS WORKS! People
would not be wasting there time posting if it didn't.
THIS REALLY CAN MAKE YOU EASY MONEY!! IT WORKS!!! A little while back, I was
browsing through newsgroups, just like you are now, and came across an article
similar to this that said you could make thousands of dollars within weeks
with only an initial investment of $6.00! So I thought," Yeah, right, this
must be a scam", but like most of us, I was curious, so I kept reading.
Anyway, it said that you send $1.00 to each of the 6 names and address stated
in the article. You then place your own name and address in the bottom of the
list at #6, and post the article in at least 200 newsgroups. (There are
thousands) No catch, that was it. So after thinking it over and talking to a
few people first, I thought about trying it. I figured what have I got to lose
except 6 stamps and $6.00, right? Like most of us I was a little skeptical and
a little worried about the legal aspects of it all. So I checked it out with
the U.S. Post Office (1-800-725-2161) and they confirmed that it is indeed
legal! Then I invested the measly $6.00. Well GUESS WHAT!!... within 7 days, I
started getting money in the mail! I was shocked! I figured it would end soon,
but the money just kept coming in. In my first week, I made about $25.00. By
the end of the second week I had made a total of over $1,000.00! In the third
week I had over $10,000.00 and it's still growing. This is now my fourth week
and I have made a total of just over $42,000.00 and it's still coming in
rapidly. It's certainly worth $6.00, and 6 stamps, I have spent more than that
on the lottery!! Let me tell you how this works and most importantly, why it
works....also, make sure you print a copy of this article NOW, so you can get
the information off of it as you need it.
STEP 1:
Get 6 separate pieces of paper and write the following on each piece of paper
"PLEASE PUT ME ON YOUR MAILING LIST." Now get 6 US $1.00 bills and place ONE
inside EACH of the 6 pieces of paper so the bill will not be seen through the
envelope to prevent thievery. Next, place one paper in each of the 6 envelopes
and seal them. You should now have 6 sealed envelopes, each with a piece of
paper stating the above phrase, your name and address, and a $1.00 bill. What
you are doing is creating a service by this. THIS IS ABSOLUTELY LEGAL! Mail
the 6 envelopes to the following addresses:
#1) Jon Thomason
11 Snowhill Meadows
Foley, MO 36617
#2) Sam Kimmel
625 Elm Dr. 340 Cole
Madison, WI 53706
#3) Jody Lehnherr
N6843 Pratt Rd.
Monticello, WI 53570
#4) Michelle Price
Midtown
P.O. Box 24002
Saskatoon, SK
Canada
S7K 8B4
#5) Tracy Nadler
29915 Meridian Pl. #16205
Farmington Hills, MI 48331
#6) Jon Huff
10668 Adam Court
Fishers, IN
46038-9050
STEP 2: Now take the #1 name off the list that you see above, move the other
names up (6 becomes 5, 5 becomes 4, etc...) and add YOUR Name as number 6 on
the list.
STEP 3:
Change anything you need to, but try to keep this article as close to original
as possible. Now, post your amended article to at least 200 newsgroups. (I
think there is close to 24,000 groups) All you need is 200, but remember, the
more you post, the more money you make! ---
DIRECTIONS ----- HOW TO POST TO NEWSGROUPS------------
Step 1) You do not need to re-type this entire letter to do your own posting.
Simply put your cursor at the beginning of this letter and drag your cursor to
the bottom of this document, and select 'copy' from the edit menu. This will
copy the entire letter into the computers memory.
Step 2) Open a blank 'notepad' file and place your cursor at the top of the
blank page. >From the 'edit' menu select 'paste'. This will paste a copy of
the letter into notepad so that you can add your name to the list.
Step 3) Save your new notepad file as a .txt file. If you want to do your
postings in different sittings, you'll always have this file to go back to.
Step 4) Use Netscape or Internet explorer and try searching for various
newsgroups (on-line forums, message boards, chat sites, discussions.)
Step 5) Visit these message boards and post this article as a new message by
highlighting the text of this letter and selecting paste from the edit
menu. Fill in the Subject, this will be the header that everyone sees as they
scroll through the list of postings in a particular group, click the post
message button. You're done with your first one!
Congratulations...THAT'S IT! All you have to do is jump to different
newsgroupes and post away, after you get the hang of it, it will take about 30
seconds for each newsgroup! **REMEMBER, THE MORE NEWSGROUPS YOU POST IN, THE
MORE MONEY YOU WILL MAKE!! BUT YOU HAVE TO POST A MINIMUM OF 200** That's it!
You will begin receiving money from around the world within days! You may
eventually want to rent a P.O.Box
due to the large amount of mail you will receive. If you wish to stay
anonymous, you can invent a name to use, as long as the mail person will
deliver it.
**JUST MAKESURE ALL THE ADDRESSES ARE CORRECT.**
Now the WHY part: Out of 200 postings, say I receive only 5 replies (a very
low example). So then I made $5.00 with my name at #6 on the letter. Now, each
of the 5 persons who just sent me $1.00 make the MINIMUM 200 postings, each
with my name at #5 and only 5 persons respond to each of the original 5, that
is another $25.00 for me, now those 25 each make 200 MINIMUM posts with my
name at #4 and only 5 replies each, I will bring in an additional $125.00!
Now, those 125 persons turn around and post the MINIMUM 200 with my name at #3
and only receive 5 replies each, I will make an additional $626.00! OK, now
here is the fun part, each of those 625 persons post a MINIMUM 200 letters
with my name at #2 and they each only receive 5 replies, that just made me
$3,125.00!!! Those 3,125 persons will all deliver this message to 200
newsgroups with my name at #1 and if still 5 persons per 200 newsgroups react
I will receive $15,625,00! With a original investment of only $6.00! AMAZING!
When your name is no longer on the list, you just take the latest posting in
the newsgroups, and send out another $6.00 to names on the list, putting your
name at number 6 again. And start posting again. The thing to remember is, do
you realize that thousands of people all over the world are joining the
internet and reading these articles everyday, JUST LIKE YOU are now!! So can
you afford $6.00 and see if it really works?? I think so... People have said,
"what if the plan is played out and no one sends you the money? So what! What
are the chances of that happening when there are tons of new honest users and
new honest people who are joining the internet and newsgroups everday and are
willing to give it a try? Estimates are at 20,000 to 50,000 new users, every
day, with thousands of those joining the actual internet. Remember, play
FAIRLY and HONESTLY and this will work.
IT IS ABSOLUTELY MANDATORY THAT ALL
STEPS ARE FOLLOWED IN ORDER FOR THIS TO BE SUCCESSFUL!
If you just stop and really think, there is absolutely NO REASON that this
opportunity cannot work for you. It is legal, honest,and will benefit all (not
just you who participate.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chip Transisto)
Subject: Re: Sendmail POP
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 01:45:39 GMT
Reply-To: Chip Transisto
POP mail server is not installed automatically in 5.2. Look for the
server in the rpm's and install it.
On Sun, 13 Jun 1999 17:14:45 -0300, "Francisco Cáceres"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have linux 5.2 server installed and I have sendmail on it but when I try
>to connect to the pop it refuses the conection, what could that be?
>
>Francisco
>
>
------------------------------
From: James Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: VPN through IP Masq
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 10:36:10 -0500
I am also trying to set something simiar to that up... but I am using a
debian linux box as the server and a second debian box as a client.
it looks something like this
win98-|
|
win98-|-linux(client)--|--internet------linux(vpn server)-----novell
server
| |
win98-| |
|
remote dial in---------|
right now I am working on the server.. I am using VTUN witch suports
encrypted packets as well as ip tunnling.
I would like any sugestion on this matter or if there is a better way of
doing this. I would also like to know if anyone is doing this so that
you can log into a novell server over a connction like this?
MikeH wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to access a VPN server from a client that is
> behind a box running IP Masq. The IP Masq machine
> is connected to the ISP with a cable modem.
>
> Does anyone specifically whether or not it is possible to
> run VPN and PPTP through IP Masq?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Mike H.
--
*****************************************
James Peterson
Network Administrator
Roman Meal Milling Company, Inc
Phone (701) 282-9656
Fax (701) 282-9743
E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*****************************************
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
