Linux-Networking Digest #628, Volume #11         Tue, 22 Jun 99 20:13:41 EDT

Contents:
  converting from BSDI to linux (Ray Todd Sevens)
  Re: Modem Sharing (Jim)
  Re: Identd -- necessary? (Mike Kozlowski)
  D-Link DE 220 PnP ISA Card (DenningL)
  Re: Maximum number of NICs (Santiago Gonzalez Herrero)
  My default route keeps disappearing... (Nathanial P Thelen)
  linux setup QoS/Fair Queuing disabled? (Zonghua  Gu)
  silly telnet question (The New Guy)
  Re: Qusetion about setting up the Internet Big Picture using Linux ("Shawn Pursley")
  Samba semi-working; Need help with Internet Connection (Blane A. Balch)
  Newbie Alias, Mail, and DNS Question (Shonne)
  Re: 2 questions... (The New Guy)
  Re: silly telnet question ("pg")
  2 questions... (Eric Wyles)
  ICMP -> Network error ("Gilbert")
  Problems with ident over my ip-masq'ed i-net linux router... (Sleinfeld)
  WIN95 -> Linux box on Serial port! ("Ferdinand V. Mendoza")
  Re: Identd -- necessary? (mist)
  Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? (was: Mindcraft Retest 
News (Philip Brown)
  Re: Identd -- necessary? (Bill Unruh)
  Linux w/Win clients on a corporate server (Josh Flechtner)
  Re: Network Analyser for IPX Network? (Mark Price)
  Re: Identd -- necessary? (Tom Holub)
  Re: SuSE Linux 6.1 & PPPIOCGUNIT Operation not permitted (Malware)
  NETSCAPE TROULBES. ("David B. Hostetler")

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ray Todd Sevens)
Subject: converting from BSDI to linux
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 16:56:08 LOCAL

I am involved in a project where we need to convert several
BSDI servers with 1000-2000 user accounts to linux servers.
The problem is that BSDI uses a different password encryption
system than Linux.  Is there any way to convert between the two.

------------------------------

From: Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,tw.bbs.comp.linux,uk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Modem Sharing
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 19:59:09 +0100

Becky wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I am a newbie of Linux. I am setting up a server using SuSE with windows
> NT machines clients.   Is it possible to install a modem in the linux
> server and allow the clients to access the internet?
> If yes, what package can i use?
> Thx ...
> 
> Becky

Does anyone know how to do the other one: share the modem in order to
direct-dail from the other machines on the LAN? Apparently modemd will
do this, but I havn't found much documentation on it. Anybody got any
better ideas?
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Kozlowski)
Subject: Re: Identd -- necessary?
Date: 22 Jun 1999 21:29:03 GMT

In article <7kouti$8sg$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tom Holub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In article <7kot5p$652$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>Mike Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>)
>)(After further research, it looks like identd is used mainly by IRC, for
>)which I have no use; and sendmail, for which I do.  Will turning it off
>)break mail transport?  I'm reluctant to experiment, since the machine in
>)question is the company's Internet gateway.) 
>
>identd allows remote sites to ask what user on your site initiated a 
>particular connection; someone initiates an SMTP connection, for example,
>and the remote host contacts your identd to find out the user id (or
>similar information) that did it.

Okay.  So if identd isn't running, will the remote machine just shrug and
establish the connection anyway; or will it deny the connection because it
can't do proper authentication?

I imagine it could be configured either way by the remote admin, but are
there machines, in practice, that reject connections if they can't
authenticate via identd?

Thanks for the info.

-- 
Michael Kozlowski                                        
http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~mlk/

------------------------------

From: DenningL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: D-Link DE 220 PnP ISA Card
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 15:36:00 -0700

I am using kerenel 2.2.9

I am forced to make use of a

D-Link 220 PnP ISA Card for a particular network system - no way
around it.

(The DFE530TX worked great as a via-rine) Thanx Sessions.


Now exactly what do I have to do to get this card to work in my
Linux box?

Boot read out:

ISA/PNP

Card  Device  DMA  IRQ  Device

 1      0      NA   3   D-Link DE 220 PnP ISA Card


All I want to know is what I have to do configure this card to work
and how to do it, or just point to the relevant RTFM.

Thanx in Advance.

Denning

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Santiago Gonzalez Herrero)
Subject: Re: Maximum number of NICs
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 22:25:24 GMT

On 20 Jun 1999 08:32:22 +0100, James Youngman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Catherine Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> 1) Can the network drivers actually support eight NICs? (specifically,
>> can the 3com drivers support eight NICs)?
>
>I've heard of people using at least five.  This tends to be fone for
>Beowulfs.  Take a look at the Beowulf HOWTO.
>
I have 6 nics (2 ne2000 PCI and 4 ne2000 ISA). There was a problem
compiling support in the kernel (i could only have 4) , but was Ok if
i use modules.
--
Santiago González Herrero
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gijón - Asturias (SPAIN)

------------------------------

From: Nathanial P Thelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: My default route keeps disappearing...
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 15:40:29 -0700

I am running redhat 5.2 and I am having a wierd problem that I can't
figure out:

Twice now I have tried to get to my computer from away and havn't been
able to.  I get to work, check my routing table and realize that my
default route is missing.  Everything else on the computer seems fine, I
add back the default route and the computer is back to normal.  I
dismissed it the first time, but it has happened again and it has me
worried.  Does anyone know why this might happen?

Thanks,
Nate

[EMAIL PROTECTED]


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Zonghua  Gu)
Subject: linux setup QoS/Fair Queuing disabled?
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 22:37:08 GMT

Hi 
When I was setting up linux 2.2.10 and I run make xconfig, there is a number
of buttons that are disabled, including QoS/Fair Queuing. Does any one know how 
to install that option? Basically that option lets you define your own queuing
algorithm instead of using the default FIFO queue at the network device. THanks.



------------------------------

From: The New Guy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: silly telnet question
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 22:41:04 GMT

If I want to telnet into my box from a remote location, does linux (I'm
using Red Hat 5.1) support secure remote sessions.

Is there a 3rd party app that would be better (I've heard people talking
of ssl??)

Thanx

The New Guy

------------------------------

From: "Shawn Pursley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Qusetion about setting up the Internet Big Picture using Linux
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 22:00:54 GMT

In response to Bill:

>The internal IP address doesn't matter so
> much as what it gets translated to by the aforementioned gateway box.
> An example might be in order:
>
> Internal IP address of webserver: 10.0.0.80
> External IP address of webserver: 207.82.89.37
>
> The translation would be provided by the gateway box, which would be
> running a program called "natd" ["nat" stands for "Network Address
> Translation", and the "d" stands for "Daemon", which is what such
> programs are called in the UNIX world].
>
This is going to be handled by addressing issues in the router when we get
it, correct?

 > Right now, Internic has our web address, which is hosted by Internic,
 > as 207.82.89.37.
>
> I'm a bit confused here... that IP address belongs to Exodus, not NSI
> [formerly Internic.net].  In any event, the important part is where that
> IP address gets routed.  Does that IP go to a machine in your office, or
> is the machine located elsewhere?  If elsewhere, you'll need to change
> the address to something you can control locally [your ISP should be
> able to provide you with one].  If it's local, then that's the IP
> address you'll tell natd to use for the external IP of your webserver.
>
> > Does this need to be changed when we pull away from Tabnet,
> > our virtual host?
>
> If Tabnet owns any of the IP addresses, then yes.
>
Currently Tabnet does our hosting, but we own our domain name.  This may not
be in the correct realm, but when I notify them that we are going to begin
hosting ourselves, what do I do next...meaning who do I notify that we are
hosting internally?  Internic/NSI?  Will they spread the word to the name
servers?

> I suggest setting up your firewall/gateway box *first*, getting that
> secure and running smoothly, and then start bringing up other boxes
> inside your LAN.  The firewall will protect those boxes from [most]
> attacks while you get them configured properly.  Once you have your
> network working correctly, and everything is [relatively] secure, *then*
> I would worry about getting DNS switched over.  This _will_ mean some
> downtime for your site, but it will also mean that once everything is up
> and running it should stay that way.

I'm trying to get this all setup prior to going online, which is making for
some extra work;  get a dial up gateway setup and then change over to T-1
connection.

So my next step is to get a box up and running that has ethernet with static
ip 192.168.1.1 and can make a connection to my ISP via dial up?  Then I get
others who will use this box to get out to the net?

Thanks again,

--
Shawn Pursley
Network Administrator
Service Transport







------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blane A. Balch)
Subject: Samba semi-working; Need help with Internet Connection
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 22:41:50 GMT

I'm a Linux newbie that has a three computer network at home connected to an ADSL line 
with Dynamic IP addressing.  One
computer is a Linux box and two computers with Win 98.  The Linux box is loaded with 
RH 6.0 and two NIC cards to serve
as a server and firewall.  I have two questions concerning Samba and connecting the 
two Win 98 computers to the internet
through the Linux box.

First.  I was able to get Samba up and running so that all my computers finally talk 
to one another and I'm able to see
all of them in Network Neighborhood.  My /etc/hosts file looks like this:

# /etc/hosts
192.168.0.1             Linux
192.168.0.2             Laptop
192.168.0.3             Desktop

My problem is is that Network Neighborhood shows my Linux computer as 
"ADSL-216-62-152"  rather than "Linux" which I
would prefer.   I think that this has something to do with the initial bootup because 
the prompt after I log in is
[root@ADSL-216-62-152-xxx /root]#    (xxx being the client address at that time).  
Does anyone know how I can change the
naming of this to read    [root@Linux /root]#   or whichever user name I login as??

Second.  I can access the internet through the Linux box but cannot seem to access it 
throught the Win 98 boxes.
Netstat -rn is as follows:

# netstat -rn
Destination     Gateway         Genmask                 Flags     MSS   Window  irtt   
 Iface
192.168.0.1     0.0.0.0         255.255.255.255 UH              0    0          0      
 eth1
192.168.0.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0           U               0    0         
 0       eth1
216.62.152.0    0.0.0.0         255.255.248.0           U               0    0         
 0       eth0
127.0.0.0       0.0.0.0         255.0.0.0               U               0    0         
 0       lo
0.0.0.0         216.62.152.xxx  0.0.0.0                 UG              0    0         
 0       eth0

I know it's probably something real simple that I'm missing on both questions but if 
someone could point me in the right
direction I would appreciate it.  The How-To on ADSL hookup seems to deal with fixed 
IP addresses rather than DHCP and
the Samba How-To doesn't touch on name changes.  If you need more info let me know and 
I'll post it.

Thanks in advance

------------------------------

From: Shonne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Newbie Alias, Mail, and DNS Question
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 21:53:46 GMT

I need to build a DNS box. Also, I need to create an alias file. Here is
the situation.  We will call the domain dof.org. I need to create a DNS
for a situation that all email [EMAIL PROTECTED] will go mail.dof.org.
When the mail reaches mail.dof.org, Big_Dof.org will need to be sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] The present is a HPUX box, and I was wanting to possibly
use those db table if they had to be rebuilt.Do I need to create a file
with the email addresses, and their forwarded address in the resolver
file format.  This is what I mean:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Will I have to create this file with all email addresses in theat
domain. Or is there a sendmail fix?
Can anyone please help or throw a website in their somewhere.


--
yes, Linux works.  Good.  Damn Good.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

------------------------------

From: The New Guy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 2 questions...
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 22:44:16 GMT



Eric Wyles wrote:
> 
> I'm running RH .2
> 
> 1)  How do I find out what my ip address is?  I am on a DHCP
> network and everything works fine, I just need to know what
> my IP address is.

run "ifconfig"  Check the man pages for additional command line options.

> 
> 2)  What is the proper way to go about changing the name of
> my machine?  I don't want it to be called
> localhost.localdomain.  I recall from the last time that I
> did this that I had some problems with send mail and a few
> other things after I attempted to change my hostname (ie,
> sendmail took ages at boot time).  In windows I use:
> computer name= "c3po"
> workgroup= "Phantom Menace"
> 
> I would like to have this same configuration in Linux.
> 

I know there is a hostname config file in /etc but I'm not 100% certain
if this is the file you want.  Any other suggestions from the pros ???


The New Guy

------------------------------

From: "pg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: silly telnet question
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 22:46:31 GMT


The New Guy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> If I want to telnet into my box from a remote location, does linux (I'm
> using Red Hat 5.1) support secure remote sessions.
>
> Is there a 3rd party app that would be better (I've heard people talking
> of ssl??)
>
> Thanx
>
> The New Guy
==========================================

You should look at SSH (Secure shell) for encrypted  sessions.

pg



------------------------------

From: Eric Wyles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 2 questions...
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 14:16:36 -0800

I'm running RH .2

1)  How do I find out what my ip address is?  I am on a DHCP
network and everything works fine, I just need to know what
my IP address is.

2)  What is the proper way to go about changing the name of
my machine?  I don't want it to be called
localhost.localdomain.  I recall from the last time that I
did this that I had some problems with send mail and a few
other things after I attempted to change my hostname (ie,
sendmail took ages at boot time).  In windows I use:
computer name= "c3po"
workgroup= "Phantom Menace"

I would like to have this same configuration in Linux.

Thanks,
Eric



**** Posted from RemarQ - http://www.remarq.com - Discussions Start Here (tm) ****

------------------------------

From: "Gilbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ICMP -> Network error
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 00:42:15 +0200

Hi:

I'm having the following problem:

I have a mail server ((8.8.7/8.8.7) RH5.0, P200/64MB-RAM
The machine starts to send 8 to 15 ICMP packets to an IP address, then the
ethernet link on the hub start to blink really fast and my network goes
down. The DNS machine does not resolve the names anymore wich make
impossible to send email or use http. I have to reboot he machine.

I'm having this problem for 4/6 days with 2 unknown IP addresses.
I put a sniffer and the only information I got was the ICMP packets.
I tried to ping manually to the IP addresses but I got no reply.
I also made a TRACEROUTE with an expired time result.

Is this a hacker attack ?

any help ?
Thanks
Gilbert



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sleinfeld)
Subject: Problems with ident over my ip-masq'ed i-net linux router...
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 22:25:54 GMT

Hey...

I have a linux box running just fine ip masq'ed for a litte (4)
windows comps. I only have problems with the ident requests from web
and from ftp sites seem to stop at the linux box. I have tried to run
identd daemons on my windows machine to check if requests are asked,
but it seems that the requests stop at my linux machine. Is there a
way to force them through ? Or a way to set up linux so that if it
gets a ident request it should forward it to a specific computer ? Or
force linux to reply e.g. seinfeld@ipadress or test@ipadresss ?

Sleinfeld,
=====
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



------------------------------

From: "Ferdinand V. Mendoza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: WIN95 -> Linux box on Serial port!
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 10:47:22 +0400

Folks,
Today I got a Toshiba notebook to play with my
Linux box. I tried to connect it to one of the
unused COM ports and I configured mgetty to
test a terminal log-in. It works.
Now, I want to use PPP over the same serial port
(no modem of course) and plan to do some
benchmarks. I can run a script to fire up PPP
once the login is successful. My problem now is
how do I configure the Windows
side to do a null modem networking.
Someone can help, please.
TIA.


Ferdinand



------------------------------

From: mist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Identd -- necessary?
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 00:00:31 +0100
Reply-To: mist <new$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Mike Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribed to us that -
>I'm trying to tighten up a Linux box, so I'm removing non-essential
>services from inetd.conf.  However, I'm unsure if identd is essential or
>not; reading the man page failed to illuminate.
>
>What do I lose if I turn off identd?
>

You lose very little.  Other computers lose the ability to gain identity
information from your box.  

Generally, places which ask for this information will be ftp sights and
mail servers that your machine connects to.  For example, if your copy
of sendmail is trying to mail somewhere else direct then the receiving
MTA might send an ident request to your computer so that it knows where
the mail is coming from.   Whether or not it will choose to accept it if
that request is not satisfied is down to the remote end. 

Of course, it could also be used by remote computers to find out info
about your computer.

Turn it off.  Then, if you find some things stop working, turn it back
on again.
-- 
Mist.

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Philip Brown)
Crossposted-To: 
omp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? (was: Mindcraft 
Retest News
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 22 Jun 1999 22:45:58 GMT

On 21 Jun 1999 15:46:16 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Philip Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>some price points:
>>...
>...
>>I HATE this. I much prefer sun boxes. But you'll certainly pay the premium for
>>them.
>
>Umm, I think you ignore considerable differences between these two
>products.  I looked at the Gateway listing for their machine - Comes with
>a single disk and looks like a typical PC.

wrong machine.

The machine I looked at (ALS9200?) supported redundant power supplies, and a
buncha disks. doesn't support so many disks. BUt I am following on from my
previous thread that was saying intel CPU/integer performance is better
for the money than sparc. so that isn't so relavant.

But I tried to make the configuration fairly similar on the E450.
 Just picked the minimum stuff for each computer: 256 megs RAM, 1 disk, etc.

>As for NT vs solaris...we'll leave that one alone.

I never said "NT vs solaris". I said "sparc vs intel".
OBVIOUSLY, you'd run solaris on both :-)



-- 
[Trim the no-bots from my address to reply to me by email!]
[ Do NOT email-CC me on posts. Pick one or the other.]
 --------------------------------------------------
The word of the day is mispergitude


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Unruh)
Subject: Re: Identd -- necessary?
Date: 22 Jun 1999 23:07:40 GMT

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Nicholas E Couchman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
writes:

>> I'm trying to tighten up a Linux box, so I'm removing non-essential
>> services from inetd.conf.  However, I'm unsure if identd is essential or
>> not; reading the man page failed to illuminate.
>>
>> What do I lose if I turn off identd?

identd is a service to others. It is a way of finding out which user is
calling out of a certain port as I understand it. I do not run identd. I
have not found anything breaking. 

------------------------------

From: Josh Flechtner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux w/Win clients on a corporate server
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 19:10:48 -0700

After pouring through mass amounts of previous postings and reply's I
feel that this question will be bombarded with answers (this is good) so
hear it goes:

    Ive opted to purchase a Dell2300 Poweredge server running only
RedHat 6.0, preinstalled, as the OS. Now the other 15 clients will be
running either Win95 (mostly),Win98 or WinNT. It seems from previous
newsgroup postings that saMBa is the "bridge" between Linux and Windoze,
so they can both co-exist peacefully.
    Has anybody (and I know your out there) attempted this process. If
so, what advice, documentation, sites, etc... can you provide a
reference or guidence. Drop me a line and thanks!

Jafgon


------------------------------

From: Mark Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Network Analyser for IPX Network?
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 16:13:38 -0700


Netmon as shipped with NT Server, and Network Associates Sniffer Pro
product.

Mark.

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Holub)
Subject: Re: Identd -- necessary?
Date: 22 Jun 1999 16:25:05 -0700

In article <7kov6v$djq$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Mike Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
)
)I imagine it could be configured either way by the remote admin, but are
)there machines, in practice, that reject connections if they can't
)authenticate via identd?

In this era of blacklists and other terrorist tactics, who knows.
No one reasonable will reject mail.
 -Tom

------------------------------

From: Malware <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: uk.comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: SuSE Linux 6.1 & PPPIOCGUNIT Operation not permitted
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 01:46:03 +0200

Hi Nick,

you wrote:
> > Why do you insist on getting assigned the address 192.237.75.1 while the
> > peer does offer you 193.237.75.1? Looks like a typo within the config
> 
> "does offer you"?  From the lines you posted one might reasonably
> infer the opposite.

Those lines are the way the IPCP protocol (and similiar protocols as
part of PPP) do work. One side does request an option and if available a
special value of it. So

sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x3 <addr 192.237.75.1>]

would say: "Please give me the IP address 192.237.75.1!" The other side
will then either:

- disagree to talk about any IP number (ConfRej)
- agree to give you this IP number (ConfAck)
or
- offer you a different IP number (ConfNak <addr newIP>)

Hope it's a bit less slang to you now.


Malware

------------------------------

From: "David B. Hostetler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: NETSCAPE TROULBES.
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 17:32:05 -0500

Running Red Hat Linux 6.0 on a machine that is not connected to the
Internet, (Just my LAN) Netscpe gives me an error saying that it cannot
find the host http://home.netscape.blah.blah you know... Anyway this
machine is specifically for web page development and I use the browser
to check my progress. Is there any way I can tell netscape's phone home
code to shut up? Also is there any way to get a Windoze 95 machine to
masquearde IP to a linux machine. (before you scream at me about it I am
just trying to avoid swapping the modem between boxes that's all, pure
laziness!)


------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************

Reply via email to