The fact that the delegreturn call appears to have hit xprt_timer is
interesting. Under normal circumstances, timeouts should never occur
under NFSv4. Could you tell us what mount options you're using here?
Also please could you confirm for us that the server is still up and
responding to request
On Feb 5, 2008 8:51 PM, Luke Cyca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello NFS List,
>
> I've been trying to set up some linux clients to work with a Mac OS X
> 10.5 (Leopard) server. So far I've made some good progress, but run
> into a few problems with Kerberized NFS. I have the ssh server on
> the
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 02:37:57PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Because kthread_stop blocks until the kthread actually goes down,
> we have to send the signal before calling it. This means that there
> is a very small race window like this where lockd_down could block
> for a long time:
>
> lockd_d
Hello NFS List,
I've been trying to set up some linux clients to work with a Mac OS X
10.5 (Leopard) server. So far I've made some good progress, but run
into a few problems with Kerberized NFS. I have the ssh server on
the linux client fully kerberized with ticket forwarding. I also
h
Chuck Lever wrote:
> Since O_DIRECT is a standard feature that is enabled in most distros,
> eliminate the CONFIG_NFS_DIRECTIO build option, and change the
> fs/nfs/Makefile to always build in the NFS direct I/O engine.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
Looks good to me
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 10:05:39AM +1100, Greg Banks wrote:
> Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
> > Last time I checked (around 2.6.22) writing large files on NFSv3 over
> > UDP was 20% faster compared to TCP (Gb LAN with one switch connecting
> > all machines).
> >
> Did all of your file arrive at th
Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 04:49:39PM +1100, Greg Banks wrote:
>
>> Chuck Lever wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 4, 2008, at 7:29 PM, Greg Banks wrote:
>>>
Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 11:19 +1100, Greg Banks wrote:
>
>
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Shirish Pargaonkar wrote:
> On 1/30/08, Tom Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I renamed it xprt-switch-2.6.git. Sorry for the confusion.
> >
> >
> > On 1/24/08 1:14 PM, "Shirish Pargaonkar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I can't clone git:
On 1/30/08, Tom Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I renamed it xprt-switch-2.6.git. Sorry for the confusion.
>
>
> On 1/24/08 1:14 PM, "Shirish Pargaonkar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I can't clone git://linux-nfs.org/~tomtucker/nfs-rdma-dev-2.6.git.
> > It is gone.
> > Wh
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 10:01 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> please take a look
>
> - Forwarded message from Andrew Dixie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 12:57:37 +1300 (NZDT)
> Subject: nfs hang on 2.6.24
> From: Andrew Dixie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
On Feb 5, 2008, at 3:30 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 01:08:28PM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
Another pass at cleaning up the NFS and NFSD entries in fs/Kconfig.
Comments / suggestions?
"Another pass" isn't clearly a "please apply if there are no
objections", so I assume you
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 01:08:28PM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
> Another pass at cleaning up the NFS and NFSD entries in fs/Kconfig.
>
> Comments / suggestions?
"Another pass" isn't clearly a "please apply if there are no
objections", so I assume you're not done?
The help text changes and the chan
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 01:09:12PM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
> Because NFSD_V4 "depends on" NFSD_V3, it appears as a child of the NFSD_V3
> menu entry, and is not visible if NFSD_V3 is unselected.
Are you really convinced this is a problem?
--b.
>
> Replace the dependency on NFSD_V3 with a "sel
Needed since the plan is to not have a svc_create_thread helper and to
have current users of that function just call kthread_run directly.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/sunrpc/sv
Have lockd_up start lockd using kthread_run. With this change,
lockd_down now blocks until lockd actually exits, so there's no longer
need for the waitqueue code at the end of lockd_down. This also means
that only one lockd can be running at a time which simplifies the code
within lockd's main loop
This is the ninth iteration of the patchset to convert lockd to use the
kthread API. This patchset is smaller than the earlier ones since some
of the patches in those sets have already been taken into Bruce's tree.
This set only changes lockd to use the kthread API.
The patch here is pretty close
> +static struct dentry *udf_fh_to_parent(struct super_block *sb,
> +struct fid *fid, int fh_len, int fh_type)
> +{
> + if (fh_len != 5 || fh_type != FILEID_UDF_WITHOUT_PARENT)
^^^
Argh - this should hav
As far as I can tell, selecting the CRYPTO and CRYPTO_MD5 entries under
CONFIG_NFSD is redundant, since CONFIG_NFSD_V4 already selects
RPCSEC_GSS_KRB5, which selects these entries.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/Kconfig |2 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deleti
Clean up: since NFSD_V2_ACL is a boolean, it can be selected safely
under the NFSD_V3_ACL entry (also a boolean).
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/Kconfig |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/Kconfig b/fs/Kconfig
index faf5620..165308d
Recently a reverse dependency was added to fs/Kconfig to ensure that
PROC_FS was enabled if NFSD_V4 was enabled.
There is a guideline in Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt that
states "In general use select only for non-visible symbols (no prompts
anywhere) and for symbols with no dependenc
Clean up: since FS_POSIX_ACL is a boolean, it can be selected safely
under the NFSD_V4 entry (also a boolean).
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/Kconfig |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/Kconfig b/fs/Kconfig
index 5f00ee7..faf5620 10
Because NFSD_V4 "depends on" NFSD_V3, it appears as a child of the NFSD_V3
menu entry, and is not visible if NFSD_V3 is unselected.
Replace the dependency on NFSD_V3 with a "select NFSD_V3".
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/Kconfig |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(
Refresh the help text for Kconfig items related to the NFS server. Remove
obsolete URLs, and make the language consistent among the options.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/Kconfig | 76 +---
1 files changed, 47 ins
Refresh the help text for Kconfig items related to the sunrpc module.
Remove obsolete URLs, and make the language consistent among the options.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/Kconfig | 44 +---
1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 15
Refresh the help text for Kconfig items related to the NFS client. Remove
obsolete URLs, and make the language consistent among the options.
Also move the ROOT_NFS config option next to the options related to the NFS
client.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/Kconfig | 115
TCP support in the Linux NFS server is stable enough that we can leave it
on always. CONFIG_NFSD_TCP adds about 10 lines of code, and defaults to
"Y" anyway.
A run-time switch might be more appropriate if people feel they would like
to disable NFSD's TCP support.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <[EMA
Since O_DIRECT is a standard feature that is enabled in most distros,
eliminate the CONFIG_NFS_DIRECTIO build option, and change the
fs/nfs/Makefile to always build in the NFS direct I/O engine.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/Kconfig| 24
Another pass at cleaning up the NFS and NFSD entries in fs/Kconfig.
Comments / suggestions?
--
corporate:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 12:50:39PM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 16:50 +0100, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
> > Last time I checked (around 2.6.22) writing large files on NFSv3 over
> > UDP was 20% faster compared to TCP (Gb LAN with one switch connecting
> > all machines).
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 16:50 +0100, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
> Last time I checked (around 2.6.22) writing large files on NFSv3 over
> UDP was 20% faster compared to TCP (Gb LAN with one switch connecting
> all machines).
>
> TCP and its timeout/retransmission behavior isn't always the best cho
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 04:49:39PM +1100, Greg Banks wrote:
> Chuck Lever wrote:
> > On Feb 4, 2008, at 7:29 PM, Greg Banks wrote:
> >> Trond Myklebust wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 11:19 +1100, Greg Banks wrote:
> >>>
> Chuck Lever wrote:
>
> > TCP support in the Linux NFS serve
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:53:24PM +0100, Rasmus Rohde wrote:
> I've cooked together a patch for making UDF exportable.
Thanks, I know some people have been waiting for this for quite a while.
Please make sure Jan Kara who's the new udf maintainer and linux-fsdevel
where we discuss general filesys
please take a look
- Forwarded message from Andrew Dixie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 12:57:37 +1300 (NZDT)
Subject: nfs hang on 2.6.24
From: Andrew Dixie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've recently updated to 2.6.24 as recommended on bug 463508.
But the new k
33 matches
Mail list logo
