On Wed, 19 May 2010 22:49:30 +0900, Jiro SEKIBA wrote:
> > > Actually, I now wonder what could have gone wrong in my case. I wasn't
> > > doing any disk intensive task and the machine wasn't suspended to ram
> > > during the course.
> >
> > This problem can happen if the block device doesn't suppo
Hi,
At Mon, 17 May 2010 16:26:14 +0900 (JST),
Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
>
> Hi,
> On Mon, 17 May 2010 00:14:59 -0400, Paul L wrote:
> > Wow, that does the trick! Here is the output after I change the number to
> > 500.
> >
> > Super-block:
> > revision = 2.0
> > blocksize = 4096
> > wr
