B-²ISceâª2ûÎrÁÈîÕ®
ÏàßênÈá±Êaj¿u¾BnÑiv§ùò{¬QvÝt/ëY
[ïú
üéHTÙ²0v`Íè ÌÕ$¤ùM&~QK
¯ý÷óÅ:±³þJqû÷XØD~8&Ô_³ò3¡S^Qô;i{°*ÂD¤þQYõ÷[-
___
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
> From: qi.f...@fujitsu.com
> Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2019 5:52 PM
> ...
> I am sorry I didn't explain it clearly enough.
> I want to say that users may not know that NVDIMM_FAMILY_HYPERV doesn't
> support monitoring smart threshold events.
> If users setup monitoring smart threshold events
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 06:15:34PM -0800, Jane Chu wrote:
> On 2/15/2019 9:39 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 04:31:33PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >>On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 10:57:12AM +0100, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> >>>(This is a joint proposal with Hannes Reinecke)
>
On 2/15/2019 9:39 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 04:31:33PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 10:57:12AM +0100, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
(This is a joint proposal with Hannes Reinecke)
Servers with NV-DIMM are slowly emerging in data centers but one key
On 2/15/19 2:56 AM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 6:05 PM Frank Rowand wrote:
>>
>> On 2/14/19 4:56 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 3:57 PM Frank Rowand wrote:
On 12/5/18 3:54 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 2:58 AM
Hi,
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag,
fixing commit: 004f1afbe199 libnvdimm, pmem: direct map legacy pmem by default.
The bot has tested the following trees: v4.20.8, v4.19.21, v4.14.99, v4.9.156,
v4.4.174.
v4.20.8: Build OK!
On 2/14/19 1:37 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> This patch set proposes KUnit, a lightweight unit testing and mocking
> framework for the Linux kernel.
>
> Unlike Autotest and kselftest, KUnit is a true unit testing framework;
> it does not require installing the kernel on a test machine or in a VM
On 2/14/19 1:37 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> Add support for aborting/bailing out of test cases. Needed for
> implementing assertions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
> ---
> Changes Since Last Version
> - This patch is new introducing a new cross-architecture way to abort
>out of a test
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 2:50 AM Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
>
> On 16/02/2019 06:39, Dave Chinner wrote:
> [..]
>
> >> We've supported this since mid 2018 and commit ba23cba9b3bd ("fs:
> >> allow per-device dax status checking for filesystems"). That is,
> >> we can have DAX on the XFS RT device
On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 12:29 PM Ric Wheeler wrote:
>
> On 2/6/19 4:12 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > Before people get too excited this isn't a proposal to kill DAX. The
> > topic proposal is a discussion to resolve lingering open questions
> > that currently motivate ext4 and xfs to scream
On 16/02/2019 06:39, Dave Chinner wrote:
[..]
>> We've supported this since mid 2018 and commit ba23cba9b3bd ("fs:
>> allow per-device dax status checking for filesystems"). That is,
>> we can have DAX on the XFS RT device indepently of the data device.
>>
>> That is, you set up pmem in three
> >
> > > >
> > > > Hi Yongxin,
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi experts,
> > > > >
> > > > > Could anyone tell me whether Linux nvdimm driver is RT compatible?
> > > > >
> > > > > When I was testing PMEM performance with fio using the following
> > > > > command,
> > > > > I
> > > > > got
12 matches
Mail list logo
