Good day,
The municipality would like to extend an invitation to
your company to
supply the attached product(s). Some of the product(s)
that we may request
may fall out of your scope of work,
Therefore we
would like you to outsource for the product(s) and supply
the
Municipality as we are
A misbehaving qemu created a situation where the ACPI SRAT table
advertised one fewer proximity domains than intended. The NFIT table did
describe all the expected proximity domains. This caused the device dax
driver to assign an impossible target_node to the device, and when
hotplugged as system
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 3:50 PM Vishal Verma wrote:
>
> A misbehaving qemu created a situation where the ACPI SRAT table
> advertised one fewer proximity domains than intended. The NFIT table did
> describe all the expected proximity domains. This caused the device dax
> driver to assign an
A misbehaving qemu created a situation where the ACPI SRAT table
advertised one fewer proximity domains than intended. The NFIT table did
describe all the expected proximity domains. This caused the device dax
driver to assign an impossible target_node to the device, and when
hotplugged as system
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 06:06:06AM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 10:01:14AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 08:09:05AM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> >
> > [..]
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * Find first mapping in the tree and free it and return it. Do not add
> > > > + *
On 14.04.20 19:58, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 4:51 AM David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>
>> On 11.04.20 02:09, Vishal Verma wrote:
>>> A misbehaving qemu created a situation where the ACPI SRAT table
>>> advertised one fewer proximity domains than intended. The NFIT table did
>>>
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 4:51 AM David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
> On 11.04.20 02:09, Vishal Verma wrote:
> > A misbehaving qemu created a situation where the ACPI SRAT table
> > advertised one fewer proximity domains than intended. The NFIT table did
> > describe all the expected proximity domains.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 4:39 AM Santosh Sivaraj wrote:
>
> For kernel versions older than 5.4, the numa_node attribute is not
> present for regions; due to which `ndctl list -U 1` fails to list
> namespaces.
>
> Signed-off-by: Santosh Sivaraj
> ---
> ndctl/lib/libndctl.c | 11 +++
>
On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 08:25:21AM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
[..]
> > +static int iomap_begin_upgrade_mapping(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos,
> > +loff_t length, unsigned flags,
> > +struct iomap *iomap)
> > +{
> > + struct
On 11.04.20 02:09, Vishal Verma wrote:
> A misbehaving qemu created a situation where the ACPI SRAT table
> advertised one fewer proximity domains than intended. The NFIT table did
> describe all the expected proximity domains. This caused the device dax
> driver to assign an impossible
For kernel versions older than 5.4, the numa_node attribute is not
present for regions; due to which `ndctl list -U 1` fails to list
namespaces.
Signed-off-by: Santosh Sivaraj
---
ndctl/lib/libndctl.c | 11 +++
ndctl/lib/libndctl.sym | 1 +
ndctl/libndctl.h | 1 +
11 matches
Mail list logo
