RE: 100k at 250

2021-02-17 Thread Rachel Griffin
Email marketing to your target audience(any city/any country) from our database will generate massive leads and set appointments, we have verified and targeted 60Mil B2B and 180 Mil B2C data for all categories globally. We will share opens and clicks also with the complete report   *   Basic Plan:

Re: [PATCH v17 07/10] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas

2021-02-17 Thread James Bottomley
On Tue, 2021-02-16 at 18:16 +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: [...] > > > The discussion regarding migratability only really popped up > > > because this is a user-visible thing and not being able to > > > migrate can be a real problem (fragmentation, ZONE_MOVABLE, ...). > > > > I think the

Re: [PATCH v5 4/9] cxl/mem: Add basic IOCTL interface

2021-02-17 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:09:53 -0800 Ben Widawsky wrote: > Add a straightforward IOCTL that provides a mechanism for userspace to > query the supported memory device commands. CXL commands as they appear > to userspace are described as part of the UAPI kerneldoc. The command > list returned via

Re: [PATCH v5 2/9] cxl/mem: Find device capabilities

2021-02-17 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:09:51 -0800 Ben Widawsky wrote: > Provide enough functionality to utilize the mailbox of a memory device. > The mailbox is used to interact with the firmware running on the memory > device. The flow is proven with one implemented command, "identify". > Because the class

Re: [PATCH v4 4/9] cxl/mem: Add basic IOCTL interface

2021-02-17 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 10:34:32 -0800 Ben Widawsky wrote: ... > > > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/mem.c b/drivers/cxl/mem.c > > > index 237b956f0be0..4ca4f5afd9d2 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/cxl/mem.c > > > +++ b/drivers/cxl/mem.c > > > @@ -686,7 +686,11 @@ static int cxl_validate_cmd_from_user(struct