On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 2:57 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Friday, December 15, 2017 2:10:17 AM CET Dan Williams wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Ross Zwisler
>>>
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, December 15, 2017 2:10:17 AM CET Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Ross Zwisler
>> wrote:
>> > The current implementation of acpi_parse_entries_array()
On Friday, December 15, 2017 2:10:17 AM CET Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Ross Zwisler
> wrote:
> > The current implementation of acpi_parse_entries_array() assumes that each
> > subtable has a standard ACPI subtable entry of type struct
> >
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Ross Zwisler
wrote:
> The current implementation of acpi_parse_entries_array() assumes that each
> subtable has a standard ACPI subtable entry of type struct
> acpi_subtable_header. This standard subtable header has a one byte length
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 3:10 AM, Ross Zwisler
wrote:
> The current implementation of acpi_parse_entries_array() assumes that each
> subtable has a standard ACPI subtable entry of type struct
> acpi_subtable_header. This standard subtable header has a one byte length
The current implementation of acpi_parse_entries_array() assumes that each
subtable has a standard ACPI subtable entry of type struct
acpi_subtable_header. This standard subtable header has a one byte length
followed by a one byte type.
The HMAT subtables have to allow for a longer length so