On Tue 15-09-20 12:49:10, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 1:01 AM Jan Kara wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Tue 15-09-20 11:03:29, col...@suse.de wrote:
> > > Could you please to take a look? I am offline in the next two weeks.
> >
> > I just had a look into this. IMHO the
On Tue 15-09-20 15:12:21, Verma, Vishal L wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 10:01 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Tue 15-09-20 11:03:29, col...@suse.de wrote:
> > > Could you please to take a look? I am offline in the next two weeks.
> >
> > I just had a look into this. IMHO the
On Tue, Sep 15 2020 at 3:49pm -0400,
Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 1:01 AM Jan Kara wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Tue 15-09-20 11:03:29, col...@suse.de wrote:
> > > Could you please to take a look? I am offline in the next two weeks.
> >
> > I just had a look into this. IMHO
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 1:01 AM Jan Kara wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On Tue 15-09-20 11:03:29, col...@suse.de wrote:
> > Could you please to take a look? I am offline in the next two weeks.
>
> I just had a look into this. IMHO the justification in 6180bb446a "dax: fix
> detection of dax support for
On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 10:01 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue 15-09-20 11:03:29, col...@suse.de wrote:
> > Could you please to take a look? I am offline in the next two weeks.
>
> I just had a look into this. IMHO the justification in 6180bb446a "dax: fix
> detection of dax support for
Hi!
On Tue 15-09-20 11:03:29, col...@suse.de wrote:
> Could you please to take a look? I am offline in the next two weeks.
I just had a look into this. IMHO the justification in 6180bb446a "dax: fix
detection of dax support for non-persistent memory block devices" is just
bogus and people got
Hi Andrian, Could you please to take a look? I am offline in the next two weeks. Thanks in advance. Coly Li 原始邮件 发件人： Mikulas Patocka 日期： 2020年9月14日周一 半夜11:48收件人： Coly Li , Dan Williams , Dave Jiang 抄送： Jan Kara , Vishal Verma , Adrian Huang , Ira Weiny , Mike Snitzer , Pankaj
