On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 10:52 AM Toshi Kani wrote:
>
> ndctl zero-labels completes with a large number of zeroed nmems when
> it fails to do zeroing on a protected NVDIMM.
>
> # ndctl zero-labels nmem1
> zeroed 65504 nmems
>
> When an ACPI call completes with error, xlat_status() called from
>
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 11:44 AM Jeff Moyer wrote:
>
> Dan Williams writes:
>
> > In support of the kernel's conversion of the dax-subsystem from a
> > 'class' to a 'bus', teach the libdaxctl subsystem-layout-specific code
> > to parse the new layout. The kernel changes do not effect the primary
On 11/06/2018 06:28 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 11:44 AM Shuah Khan wrote:
>>
>> On 10/23/2018 05:57 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
>
>>> + * Example:
>>> + *
>>> + * .. code-block:: c
>>> + *
>>> + * void add_test_basic(struct test *test)
>>> + * {
>>> + *
On 11/6/18 5:17 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 11:23 AM Shuah Khan wrote:
>>
>> Hi Brendan,
>
>> Framework looks good. I think it would be helpful to include a real test
>
> Great to hear!
>
>> in the patch series to get a feel for how effective it is.
>
> Alright, will
ndctl zero-labels completes with a large number of zeroed nmems when
it fails to do zeroing on a protected NVDIMM.
# ndctl zero-labels nmem1
zeroed 65504 nmems
When an ACPI call completes with error, xlat_status() called from
acpi_nfit_ctl() sets error to *cmd_rc. __nd_ioctl(), however,
On Wed, 2018-11-07 at 11:34 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 10:52 AM Toshi Kani wrote:
> >
> > ndctl zero-labels completes with a large number of zeroed nmems when
> > it fails to do zeroing on a protected NVDIMM.
> >
> > # ndctl zero-labels nmem1
> > zeroed 65504 nmems
