On 07/08/2016 03:56 PM, Williams, Dan J wrote:
Hi Jens, please pull from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nvdimm/nvdimm for-4.8/block
...to receive:
The removal of ->driverfs_dev in favor of just passing the parent
device in as a parameter to add_disk(). See below, it has rec
Hi Jens, please pull from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nvdimm/nvdimm for-4.8/block
...to receive:
The removal of ->driverfs_dev in favor of just passing the parent
device in as a parameter to add_disk(). See below, it has received a
"Reviewed-by" from Christoph, Bart, and Jo
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Eric Engestrom
wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom
> ---
>
> This can't compile without these macros… Is this header really used by anyone?
> Should it be removed, to avoid bit-rot?
It's used by ndctl [1]. You can't use it directly in userspace, you
need the k
On Thu, Jun 30 2016 at 1:00pm -0400,
Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23 2016 at 5:05pm -0400,
> Mike Snitzer wrote:
>
> > Jens, please pick up the first 2 block patches and I'll get the other
> > 2 DM patches staged for 4.8.
>
> Hey Jens,
>
> Looks like you're back so I figured I'd ping y
Hi,
[auto build test WARNING on linux-nvdimm/libnvdimm-for-next]
[also build test WARNING on v4.7-rc6 next-20160708]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Eric-Engestrom/libnvdimm-add
Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom
---
This can't compile without these macros… Is this header really used by anyone?
Should it be removed, to avoid bit-rot?
---
include/uapi/linux/ndctl.h | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ndctl.h b/include/uapi/linux/ndc
v2)
rewrite functions under the mapping information MEMREMAP_WB.
rewrite the comments for ARM64 in pmem.h
add __clean_dcache_area() to clean data in PoC.
v1)
The PMEM driver on top of NVDIMM(Non-Volatile DIMM) has already been
supported on X86_64 and there exist several ARM64 platforms which suppo