Re: [driver-core PATCH v6 2/9] async: Add support for queueing on specific NUMA node

2018-11-11 Thread Alexander Duyck
On 11/11/2018 12:35 PM, Greg KH wrote: On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 11:53:20AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 11:32 AM Greg KH wrote: On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 10:06:50AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote: Introduce four new variants of the async_schedule_ functions that allow

Re: [driver-core PATCH v6 2/9] async: Add support for queueing on specific NUMA node

2018-11-11 Thread Dan Williams
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 12:35 PM Greg KH wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 11:53:20AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 11:32 AM Greg KH wrote: [..] > This would be a great time for some other people to do that review :) Message received, I'll block some time.

Re: [driver-core PATCH v6 2/9] async: Add support for queueing on specific NUMA node

2018-11-11 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 11/11/18 12:33 PM, Greg KH wrote: When I see new major patches show up from an Intel developer without _any_ other review from anyone else, directed at me, I get suspicious it is happening again. Hi Greg, Please note that I reviewed this patch four days ago. See also

Re: [driver-core PATCH v6 2/9] async: Add support for queueing on specific NUMA node

2018-11-11 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 11:53:20AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 11:32 AM Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 10:06:50AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote: > > > Introduce four new variants of the async_schedule_ functions that allow > > > scheduling on a specific

Re: [driver-core PATCH v6 2/9] async: Add support for queueing on specific NUMA node

2018-11-11 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 08:59:03PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Sun 2018-11-11 11:32:08, Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 10:06:50AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote: > > > Introduce four new variants of the async_schedule_ functions that allow > > > scheduling on a specific NUMA node. >

Re: [PATCH 02/11] libnvdimm/security: change clear text nvdimm keys to encrypted keys

2018-11-11 Thread Mimi Zohar
> > Traditionally there is a single master key for the system, which would > > be sealed to a set of boot time PCR values. After decrypting all of > > the encrypted keys, the master key would be removed from the keyring > > and a PCR extended. Extending a PCR would prevent the master key from >

Re: [driver-core PATCH v6 2/9] async: Add support for queueing on specific NUMA node

2018-11-11 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 10:06:50AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote: > Introduce four new variants of the async_schedule_ functions that allow > scheduling on a specific NUMA node. > > The first two functions are async_schedule_near and > async_schedule_near_domain end up mapping to async_schedule

Re: [PATCH 02/11] libnvdimm/security: change clear text nvdimm keys to encrypted keys

2018-11-11 Thread Dan Williams
[ add keyrings and lkml ] On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 9:28 AM Mimi Zohar wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-11-09 at 15:13 -0700, Dave Jiang wrote: > > In order to make nvdimm more secure, encrypted keys will be used instead of > > clear text keys. A master key will be created to seal encrypted nvdimm > >

Re: [PATCH 02/11] libnvdimm/security: change clear text nvdimm keys to encrypted keys

2018-11-11 Thread Mimi Zohar
On Fri, 2018-11-09 at 15:13 -0700, Dave Jiang wrote: > In order to make nvdimm more secure, encrypted keys will be used instead of > clear text keys. A master key will be created to seal encrypted nvdimm > keys. The master key can be a trusted key generated from TPM 2.0 or a less > secure user