On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:36:33AM -0800, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> Make UML unflatten any present device trees when running KUnit tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
> ---
> arch/um/kernel/um_arch.c | 4
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/um_arch.c
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 01:56:37PM +, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> Hi Brendan,
>
> Please excuse the top posting, but I'm replying here as I'm following
> the section "Creating a kunitconfig" in Documentation/kunit/start.rst.
>
> Could the three line kunitconfig file live under say
>
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:36:28AM -0800, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> The ultimate goal is to create minimal isolated test binaries; in the
> meantime we are using UML to provide the infrastructure to run tests, so
> define an abstract way to configure and run tests that allow us to
> change the
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:36:25AM -0800, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> +static void segv_run_catcher(jmp_buf *catcher, void *fault_addr)
> +{
> + current->thread.fault_addr = fault_addr;
> + UML_LONGJMP(catcher, 1);
> +}
Some documentation about what this does exactly would be appreciated.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:36:24AM -0800, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> Add a test for string stream along with a simpler example.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
> ---
> kunit/Kconfig | 12 ++
> kunit/Makefile | 4 ++
> kunit/example-test.c | 88
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 03:26:03PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 1:37 PM Brendan Higgins
> wrote:
> >
> > Make minimum number of changes outside of the KUnit directories for
> > KUnit to build and run using UML.
>
> There's nothing in this patch limiting this to UML.
Not
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:36:25AM -0800, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/trap.c b/arch/um/kernel/trap.c
> index cced829460427..bf90e678b3d71 100644
> --- a/arch/um/kernel/trap.c
> +++ b/arch/um/kernel/trap.c
> @@ -201,6 +201,12 @@ void segv_handler(int sig, struct siginfo
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:36:23AM -0800, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> Make minimum number of changes outside of the KUnit directories for
> KUnit to build and run using UML.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
> ---
> Kconfig | 2 ++
> Makefile | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:36:20AM -0800, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> A number of test features need to do pretty complicated string printing
> where it may not be possible to rely on a single preallocated string
> with parameters.
>
> So provide a library for constructing the string as you go
> +static void kunit_run_case_internal(struct kunit *test,
> + struct kunit_module *module,
> + struct kunit_case *test_case)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (module->init) {
> + ret = module->init(test);
> +
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:36:18AM -0800, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> +#define module_test(module) \
> + static int module_kunit_init##module(void) \
> + { \
> + return kunit_run_tests(); \
> + } \
> +
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 01:50:01PM -0700, shuah wrote:
> On 11/28/18 12:54 PM, Knut Omang wrote:
> > On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 17:41 -0800, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > Both approaches provide assertion macros for running tests inside the
> > kernel,
> > I doubt the kernel community would like to see
On 11/28/18 12:56 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/Kconfig b/drivers/of/Kconfig
>> index ad3fcad4d75b8..f309399deac20 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/of/Kconfig
>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ if OF
>> config OF_UNITTEST
>> bool "Device Tree runtime unit tests"
Internal to dax_unlock_mapping_entry(), dax_unlock_entry() is used to
store a replacement entry in the Xarray at the given xas-index with the
DAX_LOCKED bit clear. When called, dax_unlock_entry() expects the unlocked
value of the entry relative to the current Xarray state to be specified.
In most
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 1:54 PM Alexander Duyck
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2018-11-29 at 10:55 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:07 AM Alexander Duyck
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2018-11-28 at 17:57 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> >
> > [..]
> > > > I think the flag should be
On Thu, 2018-11-29 at 10:55 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:07 AM Alexander Duyck
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2018-11-28 at 17:57 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> [..]
> > > I think the flag should be named "cancel" and set it in the
> > > device_del() path. Otherwise this is
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:07 AM Alexander Duyck
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2018-11-28 at 17:57 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
[..]
> > I think the flag should be named "cancel" and set it in the
> > device_del() path. Otherwise this is encoding code flow state in the
> > struct rather than device-state that
On Wed, 2018-11-28 at 17:57 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 4:32 PM Alexander Duyck
> wrote:
> >
> > Add an additional bit flag to the device struct named async_probe. This
> > additional flag allows us to guarantee ordering between probe and remove
> > operations.
> >
> >
Hi Brendan,
Thanks again for this series!
On 28/11/2018 19:36, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> The ultimate goal is to create minimal isolated test binaries; in the
> meantime we are using UML to provide the infrastructure to run tests, so
> define an abstract way to configure and run tests that allow
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:53:44AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> From: Matthew Wilcox
>
> commit 25bbe21bf427a81b8e3ccd480ea0e1d940256156 upstream.
>
> After calling get_unlocked_entry(), you have to call
> put_unlocked_entry() to avoid subsequent waiters losing wakeups.
>
> Fixes: c2a7d2a11552
20 matches
Mail list logo
