I have tough time to image any scenarios that could make sense a zero-sized
device.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Wilcox [mailto:wi...@infradead.org]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 1:30 PM
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com>
Cc: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org; Cheng-mean Liu (
gt;
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <wi...@infradead.org>; Cheng-mean Liu (SOCCER)
<socc...@microsoft.com>; Matthew Wilcox <mawil...@microsoft.com>;
linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvdimm: Remove minimum size requirement
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:49 PM, Socer Liu <soccer_...
In the case of emulated NVDIMM devices in the VM environment, there
are scenarios that NVDIMM device with much smaller sizes are desired, for
example, we might
use a single enumerated NVDIMM DAX device for representing each container
layer, which in some
cases could be just a few KBs size.The
On Thursday, August 31, 2017 3:31 PM, Dan Williams
<dan.j.willi...@intel.com<mailto:dan.j.willi...@intel.com>> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Dan Williams
<dan.j.willi...@intel.com<mailto:dan.j.willi...@intel.com>> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 11:09
