On 02/03, Dave Jiang wrote:
>On 02/03/2017 05:00 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Dan Williams
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Dave Jiang wrote:
On 02/03/2017 03:56 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> [auto build test ERROR on mmot
On Tue 07-02-17 08:56:56, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 12:44 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 09:30:22AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Christoph Hellwig
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 08:24:48AM -0800, Dan W
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 08:56:56AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 12:44 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 09:30:22AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Chris
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 08:56:56AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 12:44 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 09:30:22AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Christoph Hellwig
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 08:24:4
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 12:44 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 09:30:22AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 08:24:48AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
>> >> > Also can be use this opportunity
>> >>
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 09:30:22AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 08:24:48AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> > Also can be use this opportunity
> >> > to fold ->huge_fault into ->fault?
BTW, for tmpfs we already us
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 08:24:48AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
>> > Also can be use this opportunity
>> > to fold ->huge_fault into ->fault?
>>
>> Hmm, yes, just need a scheme to not attempt huge_faults on pte-only handlers.
>
> Do we need
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 08:24:48AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > Also can be use this opportunity
> > to fold ->huge_fault into ->fault?
>
> Hmm, yes, just need a scheme to not attempt huge_faults on pte-only handlers.
Do we need anything more than checking vma->vm_flags for VM_HUGETLB?
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 6:36 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 02:31:22PM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
>> Since the introduction of FAULT_FLAG_SIZE to the vm_fault flag, it has
>> been somewhat painful with getting the flags set and removed at the
>> correct locations. More than on
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 02:31:22PM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
> Since the introduction of FAULT_FLAG_SIZE to the vm_fault flag, it has
> been somewhat painful with getting the flags set and removed at the
> correct locations. More than one kernel oops was introduced due to
> difficulties of getting t
On Fri 03-02-17 14:31:22, Dave Jiang wrote:
> Since the introduction of FAULT_FLAG_SIZE to the vm_fault flag, it has
> been somewhat painful with getting the flags set and removed at the
> correct locations. More than one kernel oops was introduced due to
> difficulties of getting the placement cor
Hi Dave,
[auto build test WARNING on mmotm/master]
[cannot apply to linus/master linux/master v4.10-rc6 next-20170203]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Dave-Jiang/mm-replace-FAULT_
On 02/03/2017 05:00 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Dave Jiang wrote:
>>> On 02/03/2017 03:56 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
Hi Dave,
[auto build test ERROR on mmotm/master]
[cannot apply to linus/m
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Dave Jiang wrote:
>> On 02/03/2017 03:56 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
>>> Hi Dave,
>>>
>>> [auto build test ERROR on mmotm/master]
>>> [cannot apply to linus/master linux/master v4.10-rc6 next-20170203]
>>> [if
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Dave Jiang wrote:
> On 02/03/2017 03:56 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> [auto build test ERROR on mmotm/master]
>> [cannot apply to linus/master linux/master v4.10-rc6 next-20170203]
>> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a
On 02/03/2017 03:56 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> [auto build test ERROR on mmotm/master]
> [cannot apply to linus/master linux/master v4.10-rc6 next-20170203]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to
> help improve the system]
This one is a bit o
Hi Dave,
[auto build test ERROR on mmotm/master]
[cannot apply to linus/master linux/master v4.10-rc6 next-20170203]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Dave-Jiang/mm-replace-FAULT_FL
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Dave Jiang wrote:
> Since the introduction of FAULT_FLAG_SIZE to the vm_fault flag, it has
> been somewhat painful with getting the flags set and removed at the
> correct locations. More than one kernel oops was introduced due to
> difficulties of getting the placem
Since the introduction of FAULT_FLAG_SIZE to the vm_fault flag, it has
been somewhat painful with getting the flags set and removed at the
correct locations. More than one kernel oops was introduced due to
difficulties of getting the placement correctly. Removing the flag
values and introducing an
19 matches
Mail list logo
