On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 4:05 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 2:46 AM, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
>>> Some OF platforms (pseries and some SPARC systems) has their own
>>> implementations of NUMA affinity detection rather than usi
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 6:02 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 4:05 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 2:46 AM, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
Some OF platforms (pseries and some SPARC systems) has their own
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 4:05 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 2:46 AM, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
>>> Some OF platforms (pseries and some SPARC systems) has their own
>>> implementations of NUMA affinity detection rather than usi
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 2:46 AM, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
>> Some OF platforms (pseries and some SPARC systems) has their own
>> implementations of NUMA affinity detection rather than using the generic
>> OF_NUMA driver, which mainly exists for
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 2:46 AM, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
> Some OF platforms (pseries and some SPARC systems) has their own
> implementations of NUMA affinity detection rather than using the generic
> OF_NUMA driver, which mainly exists for arm64. For other platforms one
> of two fallbacks provide
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 05:46:04PM +1000, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
> Some OF platforms (pseries and some SPARC systems) has their own
> implementations of NUMA affinity detection rather than using the generic
> OF_NUMA driver, which mainly exists for arm64. For other platforms one
> of two fallback