[PATCH] OMAP2/3 clock: fix DPLL rate calculation

2008-11-30 Thread Paul Walmsley
From: Tero Kristo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Noncore dpll can enter autoidle state, in which case the rate calculation fails. Fixed by checking dpll mode instead of idle status. Also, previously, the OMAP2xxx code returned the wrong value for the DPLL rate under some conditions. Move the CORE_CLK rat

Re: [PATCH 0/5] extra module resets to ensure full-chip idle

2008-11-30 Thread Paul Walmsley
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008, Kevin Hilman wrote: > This series applies on top of on addtional patch which I mistakenly > assumed was already in l-o. Here it is. Just FYI, there's an updated version of this patch - following shortly... - Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

[PATCH] OMAP2 STI: fix build breakage

2008-11-30 Thread Paul Walmsley
n800_defconfig no longer builds after commit 8423eaf634aa187e2ab3cd1018ea0f2f7d31148a; fix. CC drivers/misc/sti/sti-netlink.o drivers/misc/sti/sti-netlink.c: In function 'sti_netlink_receive_msg': drivers/misc/sti/sti-netlink.c:84: error: expected expression before 'int' drivers/misc/sti/s

RE: [PATCH 0/3] OMAP: PM: enable UART clock disabling when idle

2008-11-30 Thread Igor Stoppa
On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 21:35 -0600, ext Woodruff, Richard wrote: > > From: Igor Stoppa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2008 10:07 AM > > > On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 07:55 -0600, ext Woodruff, Richard wrote: > > > > > Not unless you use some kind of flow control or protocol re

Re: [PATCH v2] v4l2_device/v4l2_subdev: final (?) version

2008-11-30 Thread David Brownell
On Sunday 30 November 2008, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > On a more philosophical note is GPIO really a single subdev or a > > collection of independent serial & discrete buses to a collection of > > subdevs?  In cx18 depending on the board, GPIO can reset chips, > > change audio mux paths, change the st

Re: v4l2_device/v4l2_subdev: please review (PATCH 1/3)

2008-11-30 Thread Hans Verkuil
Hi Laurent, On Sunday 30 November 2008 22:02:21 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Hans, > > On Saturday 29 November 2008, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > Hi Laurent, > > > > Let me start by thanking you for reviewing this! Much appreciated. > > You're welcome. > > > On Saturday 29 November 2008 00:34:44 Lauren

Re: v4l2_device/v4l2_subdev: please review (PATCH 1/3)

2008-11-30 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Hans, On Saturday 29 November 2008, Hans Verkuil wrote: > Hi Laurent, > > Let me start by thanking you for reviewing this! Much appreciated. You're welcome. > On Saturday 29 November 2008 00:34:44 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hi Hans, > > > > On Tuesday 25 November 2008, Hans Verkuil wrote: >

Re: v4l2_device/v4l2_subdev: please review (PATCH 1/3)

2008-11-30 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Saturday 29 November 2008 20:08:44 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Sat, 29 Nov 2008, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > > +Introduction > > > > + > > > > + > > > > +The V4L2 drivers tend to be very complex due to the complexity > > > > of the +hardware: most devices have multiple ICs, expor

Re: [PATCH v2] v4l2_device/v4l2_subdev: final (?) version

2008-11-30 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Sunday 30 November 2008 03:49:45 Andy Walls wrote: > On Sun, 2008-11-30 at 01:40 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > On Sunday 30 November 2008 00:31:38 Andy Walls wrote: > > > On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 18:52 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > This is hopefully the final version.