[PATCHv2] PM : cpuidle - Update statistics for correct state

2009-03-07 Thread Sanjeev Premi
When 'enable_off_mode' is 0, and (mpu_state < PWRDM_POWER_RET) the local variables mpu_state and core_state are modified; but the usage count for the original state selected by the governor are updated. This patch updates the 'last_state' in the cpuidle driver to ensure that statistics for the cor

RE: [PATCH] PM : cpuidle - Update statistics for correct state

2009-03-07 Thread Premi, Sanjeev
Sorry, missed to included a minor change. Sending updated patch in next mail. Best regards, Sanjeev > -Original Message- > From: Premi, Sanjeev > Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 12:44 AM > To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Premi, Sanjeev > Subject: [PATCH] PM : cpuidle - Update statistic

[PATCH] PM : cpuidle - Update statistics for correct state

2009-03-07 Thread Sanjeev Premi
When 'enable_off_mode' is 0, and (mpu_state < PWRDM_POWER_RET) the local variables mpu_state and core_state are modified; but the usage count for the original state selected by the governor are updated. This patch updates the 'last_state' in the cpuidle driver to ensure that statistics for the cor

Re: Problems while designing TPS65023 regulator driver

2009-03-07 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 04:07:16PM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > The boot_on semantics are kind of odd then ... > What I thought they meant: Bootloader turned this on. That's still roughly the case, though in practice there's no actual need to do this for the vast majority of regulators since

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Still more omap fixes for current -rc series

2009-03-07 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Tony Lindgren [090304 10:31]: > This should be it for the omap fixes for this -rc cycle. Hopefully > we can still get these in. Russell, here's the pull request for you for these fixes. Tony The following changes since commit fec6c6fec3e20637bee5d276fb61dd8b49a3f9cc: Linus Torvalds (1):

Re: [PATCH 4/5] OMAP3430SDP: Add support for Camera Kit v3

2009-03-07 Thread Alexey Klimov
Hello, all On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 10:54 +0900, DongSoo(Nathaniel) Kim wrote: > Hi Alexey, > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Alexey Klimov wrote: > > Hello, all > > > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Curran, Dominic wrote: > >> > >> Hi Kim > >> > >>> -Original Message- > >>> From: linu

Re: [PATCH 1/9] omap3isp: Add ISP main driver and register definitions

2009-03-07 Thread Alexey Klimov
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 13:34 +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote: > Thanks for the comments, Alexey! > > Alexey Klimov wrote: > >> +static int isp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > >> +{ > >> + struct isp_device *isp; > >> + int ret_err = 0; > >> + int i; > >> + > >> + isp = kzalloc(sizeof(*isp), GFP

Re: [PATCH 9/9] omap34xxcam: Add camera driver

2009-03-07 Thread Alexey Klimov
Hello, Sakari Ailus On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 16:09 +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote: > Alexey Klimov wrote: > >> +static int vidioc_g_fmt_vid_cap(struct file *file, void *fh, > >> + struct v4l2_format *f) > >> +{ > >> + struct omap34xxcam_fh *ofh = fh; > >> + struct omap34xxcam_vi

RE: where is "struct constraint_id" defined?

2009-03-07 Thread Nayak, Rajendra
> -Original Message- > From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org > [mailto:linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Paul Walmsley > Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 1:55 AM > To: david.hag...@gmail.com > Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: where is "struct constraint_id" define