Noisy, unusable touchscreen on LDP with 2.6.29

2009-04-01 Thread Koen Kooi
Hi, I recently move my zoom1 board over to the linux-omap tree, which was a great improvement over the omapzoom tree (serial and ethernet don't die after a few seconds), but the touchscreen has become unusable. Are more people seeing this? regards, Koen PGP.sig Description: Dit deel va

RE: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: OMAP3: Add support for 3430 SDP, v3

2009-04-01 Thread Pandita, Vikram
>-Original Message- >From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org >[mailto:linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Kevin >Hilman >> > > >>> > Anand, >>> > >>> > It looks like the timers are not configured properly or the timer >>> > selection has gone wrong. Can >you just compare your p

Re: PM branch rebased to 2.6.29... for real this time

2009-04-01 Thread Kim Kyuwon
Hi Kevin, Sanjeev, I'm having the same problem. when clk_set_rate() is invoked in omap_cpu_init() as shown below: clk_set_rate(mpu_clk, policy->cpuinfo.max_freq * 1000); It acquires the clocks mutex by the next statement. mutex_lock(&clocks_mutex); But after invoking arch_cloc

[PATCH] ARM: Do early I/O mapping if spinlock debugging is enabled (Re: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: OMAP3: Add support for 3430 SDP, v3)

2009-04-01 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Kevin Hilman [090401 16:18]: > Tony Lindgren writes: > > > * Paul Walmsley [090401 12:04]: > >> On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Syed Mohammed, Khasim wrote: > >> > >> > > -Original Message- > >> > > From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org > >> > > [mailto:linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Beh

Re: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: OMAP3: Add support for 3430 SDP, v3

2009-04-01 Thread Kevin Hilman
Tony Lindgren writes: > * Paul Walmsley [090401 12:04]: >> On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Syed Mohammed, Khasim wrote: >> >> > > -Original Message- >> > > From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org >> > > [mailto:linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of >> > > Gadiyar, Anand >> > > Sent: Wednes

[PATCH] MMC: OMAP: flush posted write to IRQ

2009-04-01 Thread Kevin Hilman
Spurious IRQs seen on MMC after 2.6.29. Flush posted write in IRQ handler. Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman --- drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c index 3916a56..4270676

Re: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: OMAP3: Add support for 3430 SDP, v3

2009-04-01 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Paul Walmsley [090401 12:04]: > On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Syed Mohammed, Khasim wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org > > > [mailto:linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of > > > Gadiyar, Anand > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 1:55 PM > > >

[PATCH] [OMAPZOOM] DSPBRIDGE: move platform_device_register under mach-omap2

2009-04-01 Thread Guzman Lugo, Fernando
This is the previous patch from Hiroshi (http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=123798191710417&w=2) rebase to apply on top of the previous patches for OMAPZOOM. >From 18cf4f8463013936fda13434ef65beba8df62487 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hiroshi DOYU Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:21:18 -0500 Subject:

[PATH] [OMAPZOOM] DSPBRIDGE: move platform_device_register under mach-omap2

2009-04-01 Thread Guzman Lugo, Fernando
This is the previous patch from Hiroshi (http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=123798191710417&w=2) rebase to apply on top of the previous patches for OMAPZOOM. >From 18cf4f8463013936fda13434ef65beba8df62487 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hiroshi DOYU Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:21:18 -0500 Subject:

Re: lowmemory android driver not needed?

2009-04-01 Thread David Rientjes
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Trilok Soni wrote: > Any updates on top of mem_notify v6 patches? Is there any WIP for > mem_notify with memcg infrastructure as you have pointed out above? > The /dev/mem_notify patches seem to have been abandoned, but there's still an interest in a per-cgroup oom notifie

Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP3: Fix HW SAVEANDRESTORE shift define

2009-04-01 Thread Paul Walmsley
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Kalle Jokiniemi wrote: > The OMAP3430ES2_SAVEANDRESTORE_SHIFT macro is used > by powerdomain code in > "1 << OMAP3430ES2_SAVEANDRESTORE_SHIFT" manner, but > the definition was also (1 << 4), meaning we actually > modified bit 16. So the definition needs to be 4. Thanks Kalle,

RE: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: OMAP3: Add support for 3430 SDP, v3

2009-04-01 Thread Paul Walmsley
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Syed Mohammed, Khasim wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org > > [mailto:linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of > > Gadiyar, Anand > > Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 1:55 PM > > To: Russell King - ARM Linux > > Cc: Tony Lindgr

Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP3: Fix HW SAVEANDRESTORE shift define

2009-04-01 Thread Kevin Hilman
Kalle Jokiniemi writes: > The OMAP3430ES2_SAVEANDRESTORE_SHIFT macro is used > by powerdomain code in > "1 << OMAP3430ES2_SAVEANDRESTORE_SHIFT" manner, but > the definition was also (1 << 4), meaning we actually > modified bit 16. So the definition needs to be 4. > > This fixes also a cold reset

Re: PM branch rebased to 2.6.29... for real this time

2009-04-01 Thread Kevin Hilman
"Premi, Sanjeev" writes: [...] >> Sounds to me like CPUfreq is changing frequencies during bootup. Did >> you select ondemand as the default CPUfreq governor? > > [sp] Yes. This is what I feel too. Only I was not clear why the process > gets stuck at WFI. Haven't been able to debug further. So

Re: lowmemory android driver not needed?

2009-04-01 Thread Trilok Soni
Hi On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 8:20 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: >> >> Care to work on your mem_notify patch again and bring it up to date? >> That would be a good place to start working from, right? > > Unfortunately No ;) > > I should rewrite memory notification patchset from scratch. > the new vers

RE: [PATCH 1/4] [OMAPZOOM] DSPBRIDGE: Memory lock for DMM.

2009-04-01 Thread Kanigeri, Hari
Doyu-san, > What I meant by "vma->vm_ops->close(vma)" was that, if (v)-(p)-(d) > mapping can be tied just to some process context in saner manner, I > think that we don't have to call "find_task_by_vpid(pCtxtclosed->pid)" > explicitly/globally, but automatically it can be cleaned up, when a > proc

Re: [PATCH 1/4] [OMAPZOOM] DSPBRIDGE: Memory lock for DMM.

2009-04-01 Thread Hiroshi DOYU
From: "ext Kanigeri, Hari" Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/4] [OMAPZOOM] DSPBRIDGE: Memory lock for DMM. Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 16:58:08 +0200 > Doyu-san, > > > There can be multiple user applications which can do (v)-(p)-(d) > > mapping and these processes can be killed unexpectedly. Even in such a > > ca

RE: [PATCH 1/4] [OMAPZOOM] DSPBRIDGE: Memory lock for DMM.

2009-04-01 Thread Kanigeri, Hari
Doyu-san, > There can be multiple user applications which can do (v)-(p)-(d) > mapping and these processes can be killed unexpectedly. Even in such a > case, it would be nice if (p)-(d) mapping could be released without > restarting a whole iommu. > > (v): mpu virtual address > (p): physicall add

Re: [PATCH 1/4] [OMAPZOOM] DSPBRIDGE: Memory lock for DMM.

2009-04-01 Thread Hiroshi DOYU
Hi Hari, From: "ext Kanigeri, Hari" Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/4] [OMAPZOOM] DSPBRIDGE: Memory lock for DMM. Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 15:01:29 +0200 [...] > > Hmfor this page swapping case, I think that handling this issue in > > kernel may cause more complexity and this can be avoided by "mlock()"

Re: [PATCH] DSPBRIDGE: Fix module build warnings

2009-04-01 Thread Ameya Palande
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Ameya Palande <2am...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Ameya Palande <2am...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Artem, >> >> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: >>> >>> Artem Bityutskiy wrote: Ameya Palande wrote: >

Re: [PATCH] DSPBRIDGE: Fix module build warnings

2009-04-01 Thread Ameya Palande
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Ameya Palande <2am...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Artem, > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: >> >> Artem Bityutskiy wrote: >>> >>> Ameya Palande wrote: diff --git a/drivers/dsp/bridge/wmd/tiomap3430.c b/drivers/dsp/bridge/wmd/ti

RE: [PATCH 1/4] [OMAPZOOM] DSPBRIDGE: Memory lock for DMM.

2009-04-01 Thread Kanigeri, Hari
Hi Doyu-san, > > Hmfor this page swapping case, I think that handling this issue in > kernel may cause more complexity and this can be avoided by "mlock()" > for that buffer in userland? This looks more sipmpler? > > > -- I see your point of handling the locking from user-space itself. This

[PATCH 1/1] DSPBRIDGE: fix section mismatch warning

2009-04-01 Thread Hiroshi DOYU
Signed-off-by: Hiroshi DOYU --- drivers/dsp/bridge/rmgr/drv_interface.c |8 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/dsp/bridge/rmgr/drv_interface.c b/drivers/dsp/bridge/rmgr/drv_interface.c index 350e1b5..7f1f1d6 100755 --- a/drivers/dsp/bridge/rmgr/d

[PATCH 2.6.29] MUSB: Use Mode 1 for TX if transfer size equals maxpacket

2009-04-01 Thread Gadiyar, Anand
From: Anand Gadiyar MUSB: Use Mode 1 for TX if transfer size equals maxpacket Without this change, musb will not correctly send out a ZLP if the last transfer is exactly equal to the maxpacket size and request->zero is set. CC: David Brownell Signed-off-by: Anand Gadiyar --- (Resending with

RE: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: OMAP3: Add support for 3430 SDP, v3

2009-04-01 Thread Syed Mohammed, Khasim
> -Original Message- > From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org > [mailto:linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of > Gadiyar, Anand > Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 1:55 PM > To: Russell King - ARM Linux > Cc: Tony Lindgren; linux-arm-ker...@lists.arm.linux.org.uk; > linux-omap@vge

RE: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: OMAP3: Add support for 3430 SDP, v3

2009-04-01 Thread Gadiyar, Anand
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 05:12:18PM +0530, Gadiyar, Anand wrote: > > I could not run the 3430 SDP defconfig from mainline. The image hangs at > > "Starting kernel ...". Enabling CONFIG_DEBUG_LL does not help. > > Did you add the ne

Re: [PATCH 1/4] [OMAPZOOM] DSPBRIDGE: Memory lock for DMM.

2009-04-01 Thread Hiroshi DOYU
Hi, From: "ext Guzman Lugo, Fernando" Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/4] [OMAPZOOM] DSPBRIDGE: Memory lock for DMM. Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 03:04:39 +0100 > > Hi, > I am resending this patch because the previous one has an error. > > > From 81c5b93ad42c40179c2b271f61814f0b4035440c Mon Sep 17 00:00

Re: [PATCH 1/4] [OMAPZOOM] [UPDATE]DSPBRIDGE: Memory lock for DMM.

2009-04-01 Thread Artem Bityutskiy
Guzman Lugo, Fernando wrote: + patemp = pa; + while (temp++ < num4KEntries) { + /* FIXME: This is a hack to avoid getting pages for +* video overlay */ + if (pfn_valid(__phys_to_pfn(pate

RE: PM branch rebased to 2.6.29... for real this time

2009-04-01 Thread Premi, Sanjeev
> -Original Message- > From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khil...@deeprootsystems.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 10:42 AM > To: Premi, Sanjeev > Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Nayak, Rajendra > Subject: Re: PM branch rebased to 2.6.29... for real this time > > "Premi, Sanjeev" writes

Re: [PATCH] DSPBRIDGE: Fix module build warnings

2009-04-01 Thread Artem Bityutskiy
Artem Bityutskiy wrote: Ameya Palande wrote: diff --git a/drivers/dsp/bridge/wmd/tiomap3430.c b/drivers/dsp/bridge/wmd/tiomap3430.c index 1fca3e5..b489da1 100644 --- a/drivers/dsp/bridge/wmd/tiomap3430.c +++ b/drivers/dsp/bridge/wmd/tiomap3430.c @@ -2034,26 +2034,27 @@ static DSP_STATUS PteSet(

Re: [PATCH] DSPBRIDGE: Fix module build warnings

2009-04-01 Thread Artem Bityutskiy
Ameya Palande wrote: diff --git a/drivers/dsp/bridge/wmd/tiomap3430.c b/drivers/dsp/bridge/wmd/tiomap3430.c index 1fca3e5..b489da1 100644 --- a/drivers/dsp/bridge/wmd/tiomap3430.c +++ b/drivers/dsp/bridge/wmd/tiomap3430.c @@ -2034,26 +2034,27 @@ static DSP_STATUS PteSet(struct PgTableAttrs *pt,