Hi,
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 01:44:09PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
These are all supposed to go into -rc cycle but I guess we're already
too late for that (?). If so, let me know and I can add Cc:
sta...@kernel.org to all of those patches so they go to stable releases
too.
The following
Hi,
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 02:42:44PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
forgot to Cc linux-omap. Sorry
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 02:03:53PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi Tony,
these patches are for 2.6.40 merge window.
The following changes since commit
On Mon, 23 May 2011 09:14:38 +0300
Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com wrote:
a gentle ping here too. Without this we will have regressions on
ehci/ohci as the pm_runtime patches have gone in via Samuel.
Does this mean that those regressions happened already when those
patches were made if there is
On 22 May 2011 15:49, Igor Grinberg grinb...@compulab.co.il wrote:
Hi Javier,
linux-omap should be CC'ed - added.
In addition to Koen's comments, some comments below.
On 05/20/11 16:47, Javier Martin wrote:
isp.h file has to be included as a temporal measure
since clocks of the isp are
Hi Steve,
I know you've been using OMAP2_DSS_USE_DSI_PLL Kconfig option to use DSI
PLL for pixel clock, so I wanted to point out that that has changed in
the current DSS2 master (soon to be merged, I hope). You will now need
to select the clock usage in the board file, for example:
diff --git
Hi Javier,
On Monday 23 May 2011 09:25:01 javier Martin wrote:
On 22 May 2011 15:49, Igor Grinberg grinb...@compulab.co.il wrote:
[snip]
@@ -309,6 +357,15 @@ static int beagle_twl_gpio_setup(struct device
*dev, pr_err(%s: unable to configure EHCI_nOC\n, __func__); }
+ if
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:15:15AM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
On Mon, 23 May 2011 09:14:38 +0300
Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com wrote:
a gentle ping here too. Without this we will have regressions on
ehci/ohci as the pm_runtime patches have gone in via Samuel.
Does this mean that those
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 03:35:10, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
As a result of c42321c (genirq: Make generic irq chip depend on
CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP), we now need those platforms using this in
my tree to select this symbol.
Signed-off-by: Russell King rmk+ker...@arm.linux.org.uk
--
On 22/05/11 23:48, Mark Brown wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 09:21:23PM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote:
Adding support for the twl6025. Major difference in the twl6025 is the
group functionality has been removed from the chip so this affects how
regulators are enabled and disabled.
Acked-by:
On 22/05/11 23:51, Mark Brown wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 09:21:24PM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote:
The twl6025 uses a different regulator for USB than the 6030 so select
the correct regulator name depending on the subclass of device.
Acked-by: Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
Hi,
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:58:27AM +0100, Liam Girdwood wrote:
On 22/05/11 23:51, Mark Brown wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 09:21:24PM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote:
The twl6025 uses a different regulator for USB than the 6030 so select
the correct regulator name depending on the
Hi Paul,
Here are the OMAP Display Subsystem updates for 2.6.40.
Most of the patches are OMAP4 related, either fixing the old code to
allow us to implement new OMAP4 features, or implementing those new
features. Other bigger changes are ULPS power management feature and
moving the DSS header
On 23/05/11 12:13, Balbi, Felipe wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:58:27AM +0100, Liam Girdwood wrote:
On 22/05/11 23:51, Mark Brown wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 09:21:24PM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote:
The twl6025 uses a different regulator for USB than the 6030 so select
the correct
Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk writes:
As a result of c42321c (genirq: Make generic irq chip depend on
CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP), we now need those platforms using this in
my tree to select this symbol.
Signed-off-by: Russell King rmk+ker...@arm.linux.org.uk
--
Please send
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 06:48:41AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk writes:
As a result of c42321c (genirq: Make generic irq chip depend on
CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP), we now need those platforms using this in
my tree to select this symbol.
Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk writes:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 06:48:41AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk writes:
As a result of c42321c (genirq: Make generic irq chip depend on
CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP), we now need those
On 05/23/11 10:47, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Javier,
On Monday 23 May 2011 09:25:01 javier Martin wrote:
On 22 May 2011 15:49, Igor Grinberg grinb...@compulab.co.il wrote:
[snip]
@@ -309,6 +357,15 @@ static int beagle_twl_gpio_setup(struct device
*dev, pr_err(%s: unable to configure
Op 22 mei 2011, om 16:30 heeft Igor Grinberg het volgende geschreven:
Hi Koen,
On 05/20/11 13:59, k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote:
From: Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net
The USB enable GPIO has been inverted and the USER button moved.
Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi
cpufreq table allocated by opp_init_cpufreq_table is better
freed by OPP layer itself. This allows future modifications to
the table handling to be transparent to the users.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com
---
Example discussion: http://marc.info/?t=13057044065r=1w=2
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 06:12:15PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
cpufreq table allocated by opp_init_cpufreq_table is better
freed by OPP layer itself. This allows future modifications to
the table handling to be transparent to the users.
...
+void opp_free_cpufreq_table(struct device *dev,
+
Hello!
On May 23, 2011, at 8:48 PM, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
Thank you very much for this work. I am considering the idea of buying one
of these Nook Color things; at least it would get good company from a
couple of other half-finished ARM-type projects lying around. But, most
On Sun, 22 May 2011, gr...@linuxhacker.ru wrote:
Hello!
Next attempt at BN Nook Color board file submission.
USB peripheral mode is fully operational as is serial console and
MMC/SDCard.
[snip]
Thank you very much for this work. I am considering the idea of buying one
of these
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 19:05, Todd Poynor toddpoy...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 06:12:15PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
cpufreq table allocated by opp_init_cpufreq_table is better
freed by OPP layer itself. This allows future modifications to
the table handling to be
Hi Steve,
Le mercredi 18 mai 2011 à 12:07 -0500, Steve Calfee a écrit :
On 05/17/11 22:41, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 22:35:09 Steve Calfee wrote:
I think the generally accepted method of doing stuff like this is to
have the ifdeffery in a header file where a inline code
24 matches
Mail list logo
