Hi,
It is good idea add this feature.
1: Can we let the ret = hwspin_lock_tests(ops, hwlock); add after
hwspin_lock_register_single have return
succeed, that can avoid test duplicated Or error lockid. Of course, If
this interface is intend to test soc hardware capability only, we can
put it
Hi,
It is good idea add this feature.
1: Can we let the ret = hwspin_lock_tests(ops, hwlock); add after
hwspin_lock_register_single have return
succeed, that can avoid test duplicated Or error lockid. Of course, If
this interface is intend to test soc hardware capability only, we can
put it
Remove now-obsolete code from arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c. This
mostly consists of removing the first attempt at device PM latency
handling. This was never really used, has been replaced by the common
dev_pm_qos code, and needs to go away as part of the DT conversion.
Also, the early
These regulators are common to igep0020 and igep0030 boards
and are needed by smsc911x controller.
Cc: BenoƮt Cousson b-cous...@ti.com
Cc: Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com
Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra eballe...@gmail.com
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas jav...@dowhile0.org
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia
$subject
s/arm:omap/ARM: OMAP:
On Sunday 30 December 2012 02:13 AM, ahema...@gmail.com wrote:
From: ahemaily ahema...@gmail.com
The variable dma_lch_count used for comparison (omap_dma_reserve_channels =
dma_lch_count)
before it initialized to the value from omap_dma_dev_attr :