On 11/05/2013 11:43 PM, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 16:40 +0200, Tero Kristo wrote:
On 10/31/2013 04:03 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 10/25/2013 10:56 AM, Tero Kristo wrote:
[...]
diff --git a/include/linux/clk-provider.h b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
index 7e59253..63ff78c
On Sun 2013-10-27 22:24:43, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
From: Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
This patch converts the rx51 ASoC module to use
snd_soc_register_card. It also adds module alias
to support driver autoloading.
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by:
Hi!
From: Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
This patch adds support for the audio chip to the legacy
boardcode of the Nokia N900.
In 0/4, you said:
For example non DT boot
does not work, because I did not yet add pdata in boardcode.
So, perhaps we don't need this patch for now and can
Hi!
This patch adds device tree support to the Nokia N900 audio driver.
Note, N900 audio driver.
+- compatible: nokia,rx51-audio
Still, it is rx51-audio. If it is feasible, could we move away from
rx51 naming and into n900 naming that is familiar to mere humans?
We can rename the sources
Hi!
This patch adds support for specifying auxiliary codecs and
codec configuration via device tree phandles.
This change adds new fields to snd_soc_aux_dev and snd_soc_codec_conf
and adds support for the changes to SoC core methods.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel s...@debian.org
---
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.12.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.12/20131105122637/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass (14/14): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only,
Hello Jarkko Nikula,
This is a semi-automatic email about new static checker warnings.
The patch 1a6458847dd2: ARM: OMAP: mcbsp: Make wakeup control
generic from Sep 26, 2011, leads to the following Smatch complaint:
sound/soc/omap/mcbsp.c:590 omap_mcbsp_free()
error: we previously
Hi Vaibhav,
On 10/31/2013 05:25 PM, Vaibhav Bedia wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Daniel Mack zon...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
+
+static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(edma_pm_ops, edma_pm_suspend, edma_pm_resume);
+
static struct platform_driver edma_driver = {
.driver = {
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 09:51:45PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
(I'm CCing the MTD list, because GPMC is the memory controller
used for NOR, NAND and OneNAND devices).
Hi all,
Just a small patchset containing two small cleanups and a minor fix
for the GPMC memory controller. The first
Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan shc_w...@mail.ru
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig
index dc21df1..c5c7c9c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig
+++
Hello Rajendra Nayak,
This is a semi-automatic email about new static checker warnings.
The patch cd8abed1da91: ARM: OMAP2+: Powerdomain: Remove the need to
always have a voltdm associated to a pwrdm from Jun 17, 2013, leads
to the following Smatch complaint:
From: Ezequiel Garcia [mailto:ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com]
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 09:18:53PM +, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
I'm not sure, of course, but I don't see why not. It's more likely to
break for x16 than it is for x8.
Another question here is ..
The above patch
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 08:54:56PM +, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
From: Ezequiel Garcia [mailto:ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com]
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 09:18:53PM +, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
I'm not sure, of course, but I don't see why not. It's more likely to
break for x16 than it
When booting Nokia N900 smartphone with v3.12 + omap2plus_defconfig
(LOCKDEP enabled) and CONFIG_DISPLAY_PANEL_SONY_ACX565AKM enabled,
the following BUG is seen during the boot:
[7.302154] =
[7.307128] [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ]
[
From: Ezequiel Garcia
[...]
But: on the other hand, I'd really like you to convince me as to
why is it so bad to require the DTB to have the proper GPMC bus width.
No its not at all bad, all I want is either of the one way (not mixture of
both).
- Either depend on DT completely (which is
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 10:00:09PM +, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
From: Ezequiel Garcia
[...]
But: on the other hand, I'd really like you to convince me as to
why is it so bad to require the DTB to have the proper GPMC bus width.
No its not at all bad, all I want is either of the one way
16 matches
Mail list logo
