Hi,
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Cousson, Benoit b-cous...@ti.com wrote:
On 5/23/2011 6:40 AM, Gulati, Shweta wrote:
Benoit,
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Cousson, Benoitb-cous...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Shweta,
On 5/13/2011 8:27 AM, Gulati, Shweta wrote:
To set sr ntarget values
Benoit,
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Cousson, Benoit b-cous...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Shweta,
On 5/13/2011 8:27 AM, Gulati, Shweta wrote:
To set sr ntarget values for all volt_domain,
volt_table is retrieved by doing a look_up of 'vdd_name'
field from omap_hwmod but voltage domain pointer
Hi,
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
Shweta Gulati shweta.gul...@ti.com writes:
To set sr ntarget values for all volt_domain,
volt_table is retrieved by doing a look_up of 'vdd_name'
field from omap_hwmod but voltage domain pointer does not
belong to
Kevin,
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
Menon, Nishanth n...@ti.com writes:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 04:12, Shweta Gulati shweta.gul...@ti.com wrote:
To set sr ntarget values for all volt_domain,
volt_table is retrieved by doing a look_up of 'vdd_name'
Hi,
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Cousson, Benoit b-cous...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Shweta,
On 5/11/2011 11:12 AM, Gulati, Shweta wrote:
To set sr ntarget values for all volt_domain,
volt_table is retrieved by doing a look_up of 'vdd_name'
field from omap_hwmod but voltage domain pointer does
Hi,
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Gulati, Shweta shweta.gul...@ti.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Cousson, Benoit b-cous...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Shweta,
On 5/11/2011 11:12 AM, Gulati, Shweta wrote:
To set sr ntarget values for all volt_domain,
volt_table is retrieved
Hi,
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Avinash.H.M. avinas...@ti.com wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 04:25:19PM +0530, Gulati, Shweta wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 3:19 AM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, Gulati, Shweta wrote:
Yes, but in current code
Hi,
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Todd Poynor toddpoy...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Shweta Gulati shweta.gul...@ti.com wrote:
...
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sr_device.c
b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sr_device.c
index 2782d3f..65b2aae 100644
---
Hi,
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 3:19 AM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, Gulati, Shweta wrote:
Yes, but in current code clk_set_rate of dpll3_m2 -
'omap3_core_dpll_m2_set_rate'
doesn't update clk.rate, I will submit patch fixing that bug and will
make sure that
set_rate
Hi,
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 5:52 AM, Menon, Nishanth n...@ti.com wrote:
might be a bit late, but seeing that Kevin has'nt picked this up yet,
a couple of cosmetic comments
I think it might be great if it could be folded into one of kevin's patches.
else,
$subject - OMAP3+ and could you drop
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Janorkar, Mayuresh ma...@ti.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-
ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Gulati, Shweta
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 2:55 PM
To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Cc
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Sergei Shtylyov sshtyl...@mvista.com wrote:
Hello.
On 20-04-2011 13:25, Shweta Gulati wrote:
From: Gulati, Shwetashweta.gul...@ti.com
Core Clk Tree shows incorrect Clk rates at OPP50, as
in commit e07f469d284ca3d1f5dcf5438c22982be98bc071
Please
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
Hi
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Shweta Gulati wrote:
From: Gulati, Shweta shweta.gul...@ti.com
Core Clk Tree shows incorrect Clk rates at OPP50, as
in commit e07f469d284ca3d1f5dcf5438c22982be98bc071
calling of 'recalc
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Shweta,
Shweta Gulati shweta.gul...@ti.com writes:
As a part of Voltage Layer Cleanup Patches,
submitted by Kevin Hilman, Voltage domain
Information is removed from hwmod,
So the patch removes 'vdd_name' info from
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Avinash.H.M avinas...@ti.com wrote:
GPIO module expects the debounce clocks to be enabled during reset. It doesn't
reset properly and timeouts are seen, if this clock isn't enabled during
reset. Add the HWMOD_CONTROL_OPT_CLKS_IN_RESET flags to the GPIO
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
Vishwa, Shweta,
Vishwanath Sripathy vishwanath...@ti.com writes:
[...]
I am testing Smartreflex on your Branch 'pm-wip/voltdm'. There seems
an issue with reading VP registers.
For OMAP3 and OMAP4 reading debugfs
Kevin,
I am testing Smartreflex on your Branch 'pm-wip/voltdm'. There seems
an issue with reading VP registers.
For OMAP3 and OMAP4 reading debugfs entries shows constant voltage.
Logs are:
OMAP3:
# cat /debug/voltage/vdd_mpu_iva/curr_nominal_volt
120
# cat
Kevin,
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
Cousson, Benoit b-cous...@ti.com writes:
Hi Kevin,
On 3/19/2011 1:18 AM, Hilman, Kevin wrote:
The voltage domain pointer currently in struct omap_hwmod is not used
and does not belong here. Instead, voltage domains
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Cousson, Benoit b-cous...@ti.com wrote:
On 3/24/2011 3:00 PM, Hilman, Kevin wrote:
Hi Shweta,
Gulati, Shwetashweta.gul...@ti.com writes:
[...]
And what about vdd_name? It should probably be removed as well.
Yes, but it's currently used by the SR
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com wrote:
Gulati, Shweta wrote, on 03/03/2011 07:37 PM:
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Menon, Nishanthn...@ti.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 15:39, Gulati, Shwetashweta.gul...@ti.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
Menon, Nishanth n...@ti.com writes:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:48, Shweta Gulati shweta.gul...@ti.com wrote:
All OMAP4 boards support OPP-Turbo (800M) and OPP-Nitro (1G).
s/All OMAP4/Almost all/ - there are a minority of
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Menon, Nishanth n...@ti.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 14:57, Shweta Gulati shweta.gul...@ti.com wrote:
This Patch adds OPP enteries for IVA in OMAP4 OPP Table
and updates IVA voltage Rail values obtained from latest
OMAP4430 Data Manual Operating
hi,
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Menon, Nishanth n...@ti.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:47, Shweta Gulati shweta.gul...@ti.com wrote:
MPU voltage rail values are updated according to
latest OMAP4430 Data Manual Operating Condition Addendum.
looks like the latest is evolving :(. I
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Menon, Nishanth n...@ti.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 15:39, Gulati, Shweta shweta.gul...@ti.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Menon, Nishanth n...@ti.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 14:57, Shweta Gulati shweta.gul...@ti.com wrote
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Turquette, Mike mturque...@ti.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 3:35 AM, Gulati, Shweta shweta.gul...@ti.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Turquette, Mike mturque...@ti.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 4:31 AM, Gulati, Shweta shweta.gul
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com wrote:
Traditional SmartReflex AVS(Automatic Voltage Scaling) classes are:
* Class 0 - Product test calibration
Silicon is calibration at production floor and fused with voltages
for each OPP
* Class 1 - Boot time
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Menon, Nishanth n...@ti.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 15:23, Gulati, Shweta shweta.gul...@ti.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com wrote:
Traditional SmartReflex AVS(Automatic Voltage Scaling) classes
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Turquette, Mike mturque...@ti.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 4:31 AM, Gulati, Shweta shweta.gul...@ti.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Mike Turquette mturque...@ti.com wrote:
Introduce voltage transition notification handlers
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Shweta Gulati shweta.gul...@ti.com wrote:
The series mainly does below:
OMAP4 only
- Update MPU VOltage rail values for all OPPs
- Enable OPP-Nitro and OPP-Turbo for all boards
OMAP2PLUS
-Replace hardcoded Voltage values in OPP Table
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Gulati, Shweta shweta.gul...@ti.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com wrote:
Voltage values can get confusing in meaning with various Smartreflex
classes being active. Depending on the class used, the actual voltage
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com wrote:
Voltage values can get confusing in meaning with various Smartreflex
classes being active. Depending on the class used, the actual voltage
selected might be a variant. Hence pass the volt_data pointers through
the
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Mike Turquette mturque...@ti.com wrote:
Introduce voltage transition notification handlers for Adaptive Body-Bias
LDOs. There is an ABB LDO for VDD_MPU on OMAP3630 and an ABB_LDO on VDD_MPU
and VDD_IVA on OMAP4430.
All of these LDOs are handled similary.
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 7:38 AM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
At this point in time, there's no reason for this header file to be in
plat-omap/include/plat/voltage.h. It should not be included by device
drivers, and the code that uses it is currently all under mach-omap2/.
Jarkko,
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Jarkko Nikula jhnik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:22:09 +0530
Gulati, Shweta shweta.gul...@ti.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Jarkko Nikula jhnik...@gmail.com wrote:
Probably discussed earlier but would it make more sense
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Vishwanath Sripathy
vishwanath...@ti.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: linux-arm-kernel-boun...@lists.infradead.org [mailto:linux-arm-
kernel-boun...@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of Jarkko Nikula
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 8:47 PM
To:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Jarkko Nikula jhnik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:16:52 +0200
Jarkko Nikula jhnik...@gmail.com wrote:
Would it make more sense to set only the flag here and do the register
writes when omap3_twl_init is executing? Then it's not so strict when
the
Any comments on this Patch??
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Shweta Gulati shweta.gul...@ti.com wrote:
This Patch frees all the dynamically allocated memory
which couldn't have been released in some error hitting cases.
Signed-off-by: Shweta Gulati shweta.gul...@ti.com
---
Jean,
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:53 AM, jean.pi...@newoldbits.com wrote:
From: Jean Pihet j-pi...@ti.com
Implement OMAP PM layer omap_pm_set_max_dev_wakeup_lat API by
creating similar APIs at the omap_device and omap_hwmod levels. The
omap_hwmod level call is the layer with access to the
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 6:39 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
It's probably best if I just quote the boot log, and people see about
fixing the masses of WARN_ON()s. Notice that it completely obliterates
the early part of the boot log due to the number of
Sanjeev,
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Premi, Sanjeev pr...@ti.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Vishwanath Sripathy [mailto:vishwanath...@ti.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 7:56 PM
To: Menon, Nishanth; Premi, Sanjeev
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [query]
Abhilash,
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Koyamangalath, Abhilash
abhilash...@ti.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-
ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Gulati, Shweta
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 11:07 AM
To: linux-omap
Acked. Will make sure there is no Memory Leak issue in Smartreflex Driver.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Stefan Weil w...@mail.berlios.de wrote:
sr_info was allocated and needs a kfree before returning.
This error was reported by cppcheck:
arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c:837: error:
Sanjeev,
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Menon, Nishanth n...@ti.com wrote:
Sanjeev,
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 20:55, Premi, Sanjeev pr...@ti.com wrote:
While building the kernel at 2.6.37, i see this warning for omap3evm - with
omap3630:
Power Management for TI OMAP3.
sr_init: No PMIC
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com wrote:
Gulati, Shweta wrote, on 01/19/2011 02:10 PM:
I cant see how disable_sr is usable, further as discussed in
http://marc.info/?l=linux-omapm=129424774929498w=2
http://marc.info/?l=linux-omapm=129424774929498w=2 we
Any comments would be taken in.
Thanks
Regards
Shweta
-Original Message-
From: Gulati, Shweta
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 3:56 PM
To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Gulati, Shweta; Gopinath, Thara
Subject: [PATCH V2] OMAP3:PM:Fix for Silicon bug on Context restore on OMAP3430
From
45 matches
Mail list logo
