On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 09:15 +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 09/24/2015 01:01 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Changes since v3:
> > - Separated the two (patch 10/11 in v2 patch 10 in v3) patch which got
> > squashed
> > by accident for v3
> > - Added Tony's Acked-by to patch
On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 21:16 +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On 19 August 2011 19:49, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > 2011/8/19 Koul, Vinod :
> >> On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 15:06 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Koul, Vinod wrote:
> >
> >
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 15:06 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Koul, Vinod wrote:
>
> > Currently we have two approaches to solve this problem first being the
> > DMA_STRIDE_CONFIG proposed by Linus W, I feel this one is better
> > approach
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 16:44 +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
> Define a new api that could be used for doing fancy data transfers
> like interleaved to contiguous copy and vice-versa.
> Traditional SG_list based transfers tend to be very inefficient in
> such cases as where the interleave and chunk are onl
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 12:12 +0530, Raju, Sundaram wrote:
>
> >
> > The overall conclusion which I'm coming to is that we already support
> > what you're asking for, but the problem is that we're using different
> > (and I'd argue standard) terminology to describe what we have.
> >
> > The only i
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 16:43 +0530, Raju, Sundaram wrote:
> Vinod,
...
> >
> > > Now coming to the buffer related attributes, sg list is a nice way to
> > > represent a disjoint buffer; all the offload engines in drivers/dma
> > > create a descriptor for each of the contiguous chunk in the sg list
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 17:32 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 09:31:56PM +0530, Raju, Sundaram wrote:
> > Here it is, with proper line wrapping;
>
> Thanks. This is much easier to reply to.
>
> > I believe that even though the dmaengine framework addresses and
> >
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 21:31 +0530, Raju, Sundaram wrote:
> Here it is, with proper line wrapping;
Please cc the respective MAINTAINERS, added Dan...
>
> SDMA and EDMA are TI SoC specific DMA controllers. Their drivers have
> been maintained in the respective SoC folders till now.
> arch/arm/plat