From: Loic Pallardy
Add STEriccson DBX500 PRCM mailbox support.
Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij
---
.../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/dbx500-mailbox.txt | 27 +
drivers/mailbox/Kconfig| 7 +
drivers/mailbox/Makefile
Sorry my mistake, I forgot to clean this before sending.
Regards,
Loic
On 02/13/2013 09:55 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 09:42:07PM +0100, Loic Pallardy wrote:
>> From: Loic Pallardy
>>
>> Add STEriccson DBX500 PRCM mailbox sup
From: Loic Pallardy
Add STEriccson DBX500 PRCM mailbox support.
Change-Id: I36cbef646e26469a9490d46a5e143667aa93d762
Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij
---
.../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/dbx500-mailbox.txt | 27 +
drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
Hi Suman,
I'll send new version of patch 11 taking into account Mark Rutland's
comments.
Regards,
Loic
On 02/13/2013 05:41 PM, Anna, Suman wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 02:36:32PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Suman Anna wrote:
>>>
I have hosted the
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your comments.
On 02/12/2013 11:39 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a few comments on the devicetree binding and the way it's parsed.
>
>> +static const struct of_device_id dbx500_mailbox_match[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "stericsson,db8500-mailbox",
>> +
Hi Vaibhav,
On 01/09/2013 01:11 PM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
> Hi Loic,
>
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 16:23:24, Loic PALLARDY wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/21/2012 11:49 AM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 14:24:26, Loic PALLARDY wrote:
>>>>
On 12/21/2012 11:49 AM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 14:24:26, Loic PALLARDY wrote:
>>
> I have a few patches which are dependent on this patch series.
> Could you please keep me in cc for the future versions.
>
Sure, I'll.
/Loic
> Thanks,
> Vaibh
On 12/21/2012 11:28 AM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 18:40:08, Loic Pallardy wrote:
>> TX: replace spin by mutex
>> RX: replace spin_lock_irq by spin_lock_irqsave
>>
>
> Can you please add a short note on why this is being done?
>
Ok I'll add
On 12/21/2012 11:28 AM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 18:40:07, Loic Pallardy wrote:
>> -msg = mbox_read_reg(fifo->data);
>> -msg |= ((mbox_msg_t) mbox_read_reg(fifo->cmd))<< 16;
>> +msg->header = mbox_read_reg(fifo->dat
On 12/18/2012 05:59 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Loic Pallardy [121218 05:15]:
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Omar Ramirez Luna
>
> AFAIK the first two patches should have:
> From: Omar Ramirez Luna
Yes right, my mistake.
I'll fix that on next version.
/Loic
>
> On
On 12/21/2012 08:31 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> While we can make the branch stable, would it make sense to make
>> remoteproc for omap depend on !multiplatform during the transition, to
>> reduce dependencies a little? Either way works,
Now internal structures can remain hidden to the user and just API
related functions and defines are made available.
Signed-off-by: Omar Ramirez Luna
---
drivers/mailbox/mailbox.c | 34 ++
drivers/mailbox/mailbox.h | 44 +---
Coprocessor must be accessible during suspend transitions.
Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy
---
drivers/mailbox/mailbox.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/mailbox.c
index c0a8e49..57cb566 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox
Add STEriccson DBX500 PRCM mailbox support.
Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy
---
drivers/mailbox/Kconfig | 18 +-
drivers/mailbox/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/mailbox/mailbox-dbx500.c | 601 +++
include/linux/platform_data
For debug purpose, mailbox must be available when
interrupts are disabled to collect dump information.
Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy
---
drivers/mailbox/mailbox.c | 66 +++
include/linux/mailbox.h | 3 +++
2 files changed, 69 insertions(+)
diff
TX: replace spin by mutex
RX: replace spin_lock_irq by spin_lock_irqsave
Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy
---
drivers/mailbox/mailbox.c | 10 ++
drivers/mailbox/mailbox.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox
Some mailboxes are made up of cross interrupts
and associated shared memory.
Shared memory mapping is fixed and cross interrupt/shared
memory relation make impossible the use of virtio.
Mailbox framework must be enough opened to support
any kind of mailbox.
Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy
In order to create a generic mailbox framework, functions
and structures should be renamed in mailbox.
Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy
---
drivers/mailbox/Kconfig | 3 +-
drivers/mailbox/mailbox-omap1.c | 28 -
drivers/mailbox/mailbox-omap2.c | 60 +-
drivers
Current message type is a u32 to fit HW fifo format.
This should be extended to support any message exchanges
and type of mailbox.
Propose structure owns the original u32 and an optional
pointer on additional data.
Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy
---
drivers/mailbox/Kconfig | 9
Actually moving it from plat-omap, as this framework/driver code is
supposed to be under drivers/ folder. The framework should work with
the current supported OMAP processors (OMAP1+) that have mailbox and
can be used as a method of interprocessor communication.
The mailbox hardware (in OMAP) uses
y: Omar Ramirez Luna
Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy
Based on 3.7-rc7.
Loic Pallardy (9):
mailbox: OMAP: introduce mailbox framework
mailbox: split internal header from API header
mailbox: rename omap_mbox in mailbox
mailbox: create opened message type
mailbox: change protection mecha
On 11/06/2012 03:55 AM, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
> Now internal structures can remain hidden to the user and just API
> related functions and defines are made available.
>
> Signed-off-by: Omar Ramirez Luna
> ---
> drivers/mailbox/mailbox.c | 34
> drivers/ma
Hi Omar,
On 10/31/2012 08:22 AM, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
>
> As part of plat-omap code cleanup, I was planning to move omap-mailbox
> framework to a newly drivers/mailbox folder, right now this code is
> specific to OMAP platforms, but with some clean up it could be the
> base for a generic fram
23 matches
Mail list logo
