Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] pwm: omap: Add PWM support using dual-mode timers

Neil Armstrong writes: > This patch is based on an earlier patch by NeilBrown which is based on > a older patch from Grant Erickson which provided PWM devices using > the 'legacy' interface. > > The pwm driver was renamed to not be confused with the OMAP4 PWM dedicated >

Re: [PATCH 10/13] twl4030_charger: add software controlled linear charging mode.

Pavel Machek writes: > On Thu 2015-07-30 10:11:24, NeilBrown wrote: >> >> Add a 'continuous' option for usb charging which enables >> the "linear" charging mode of the twl4030. >> >> Linear charging does a good job with not-so-reliable power sources. >> Auto mode does not work

Re: [PATCH 03/13] twl4030_charger: correctly handle -EPROBE_DEFER from devm_usb_get_phy_by_node

Kevin Hilman writes: > ping... this boot failure has now landed in mainline sorry, I'm on leave at the moment and travelling so I'm unlikely to be able to look at this properly. I should be able to examine this issue before the end of the month but cannot promise sooner

Re: [linux-pm] suspend blockers Android integration

On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:59:43 +0200 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote: On Thursday, June 10, 2010, Neil Brown wrote: On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 11:40:27 +0200 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote: On Wednesday 09 June 2010, Felipe Contreras wrote: On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Linus

Re: [linux-pm] suspend blockers Android integration

On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 11:40:27 +0200 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote: On Wednesday 09 June 2010, Felipe Contreras wrote: On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote: On Tue, 8 Jun 2010, da...@lang.hm wrote: having suspend blockers inside the

Re: [linux-pm] suspend blockers Android integration

On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 21:51:38 -0700 Arve Hjønnevåg a...@android.com wrote: The current user space interface does not require that clients register the file descriptors that they get wakeup events from with another process. However I believe they *do* register these file descriptors with the

Re: [PATCH] - race-free suspend. Was: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)

On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 11:05:18 -0700 Brian Swetland swetl...@google.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Neil Brown ne...@suse.de wrote: On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 00:05:14 -0700 Arve Hjønnevåg a...@android.com wrote: The user-space suspend daemon avoids losing wake-events by using fcntl

Re: suspend blockers Android integration

On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 01:23:02 +0200 Ingo Molnar mi...@elte.hu wrote: Btw., i'd like to summarize the scheduler based suspend scheme proposed by Thomas Gleixner, Peter Zijlstra and myself. I found no good summary of it in the big thread, and there are also new elements of the proposal: Hi I

Re: [PATCH] - race-free suspend. Was: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)

On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 00:05:14 -0700 Arve Hjønnevåg a...@android.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Neil Brown ne...@suse.de wrote: On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 12:50:01 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de wrote: On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Neil Brown wrote: I think you have

Re: [PATCH] - race-free suspend. Was: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)

On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 22:41:14 +0200 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote: On Wednesday 02 June 2010, Neil Brown wrote: - Would this fix the bug?? - and address the issues that suspend-blockers was created to address? - or are the requirements on user-space too onerous? In theory wakeup

Re: [PATCH] - race-free suspend. Was: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)

On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 21:05:21 +0200 Florian Mickler flor...@mickler.org wrote: Could someone perhaps make a recap on what are the problems with the API? I have no clear eye (experience?) for that (or so it seems). Good interface design is an acquired taste. And it isn't always easy to explain

Re: [PATCH] - race-free suspend. Was: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)

On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 19:44:59 -0700 Arve Hjønnevåg a...@android.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Dmitry Torokhov dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 09:05:21PM +0200, Florian Mickler wrote: On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 21:02:24 +1000 Neil Brown ne...@suse.de wrote

Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)

On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 10:47:49 -0400 (EDT) Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu wrote: On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Neil Brown wrote: With wakeup events the problem isn't so bad. Wakeup events are always noticed, and if the system is designed properly they will either abort a suspend-in-progress

[PATCH] - race-free suspend. Was: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)

On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 12:50:01 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de wrote: On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Neil Brown wrote: I think you have acknowledged that there is a race with suspend - thanks. Next step was can it be closed. You seem to suggest that it can, but you describe

Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)

On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 00:05:19 +0200 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote: On Monday 31 May 2010, Neil Brown wrote: On Thu, 27 May 2010 23:40:29 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de wrote: On Thu, 27 May 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Thursday 27 May 2010, Thomas

Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)

On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 02:32:20 +0200 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote: On Tuesday 01 June 2010, Neil Brown wrote: I want to be able to turn my freerunner upside-down by which I tell it (via the accelerometers) that I am done and want it to turn off. If a TXT message comes in just

Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)

On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 03:49:37 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de wrote: On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Neil Brown wrote: And if you are right that the race window cannot be closed, then the whole suspend-blocker infrastructure is pointless as the purpose of it is simply to close

Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)

On Mon, 31 May 2010 22:10:00 -0400 (EDT) Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu wrote: On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Neil Brown wrote: As I said before, we generally can't prevent such things from happening, because even if we handle the particular race described above, it still is possible

Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)

On Thu, 27 May 2010 23:40:29 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de wrote: On Thu, 27 May 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Thursday 27 May 2010, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Thu, 27 May 2010, Alan Stern wrote: On Thu, 27 May 2010, Felipe Balbi wrote: On Thu, May