On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:41 AM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Govindraj.R govindraj.r...@ti.com [120510 06:09]:
From: Govindraj.R govindraj.r...@ti.com
The commit (bce492c0 ARM: OMAP2+: UART: Fix incorrect population of
default uart pads) removed default uart pads that where
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Russ Dill russ.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Govindraj.R govindraj.r...@ti.com wrote:
From: Govindraj.R govindraj.r...@ti.com
The commit (bce492c0 ARM: OMAP2+: UART: Fix incorrect population of
default uart pads) removed default uart
Hi Tarun,
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma
tarun.ka...@ti.com wrote:
Here are the remaining cleanup patches. There are broadly
two categories of cleanups.
Cat-1: Those missed while introducing new feature like SPARSE_IRQ
handling and DT support; use edge/level
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
Govindraj,
After your commit bce492c04ba8fc66a4ea0a52b181ba255daaaf54 (ARM: OMAP2+:
UART: Fix incorrect population of default uart pads), the kernel does not
return from static suspend when off-mode is enabled upon an
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
Hi,
Looking at this again..
* Govindraj.R govindraj.r...@ti.com [120306 00:34]:
From: Govindraj.R govindraj.r...@ti.com
All beagle boards rev AX/BX have external usb hubs connected to ehci
interface, external
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Russ Dill russ.d...@ti.com wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Raja, Govindraj govindraj.r...@ti.com wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Russ Dill russ.d...@ti.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Raja, Govindraj govindraj.r...@ti.com
wrote
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Russ Dill russ.d...@ti.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Raja, Govindraj govindraj.r...@ti.com
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Keshava Munegowda
keshava_mgo...@ti.com wrote:
From: Keshava Munegowda keshava_mgo...@ti.com
It is observed
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote:
Op 2 mei 2012, om 12:38 heeft Raja, Govindraj het volgende geschreven:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Russ Dill russ.d...@ti.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Raja, Govindraj govindraj.r...@ti.com
wrote
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
Govindraj.R govindraj.r...@ti.com writes:
From: Govindraj.R govindraj.r...@ti.com
The following commit:
(7496ba3 ARM: OMAP2+: UART: Add default mux for all uarts)
added default pads for all uarts. But not all boards tend
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Matt Porter mpor...@ti.com [120420 09:04]:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 02:39:32PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org [120330 14:14]:
On Mar 30, 2012, at 1:48 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
Hi Alan,
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
index 9c4c05b..0dc246d 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
@@ -1284,6 +1284,8
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:38 AM, Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk wrote:
The point is that wakeups should be enabled whenever driver is in use,
and disabled when the driver is not in use.
Which is the tty_port methods for initialisation and shutdown, which are
mutex protected against each
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
Govindraj.R govindraj.r...@ti.com writes:
From: Govindraj.R govindraj.r...@ti.com
The wakeups can be left enabled by default and should be disabled
only when disabled from sysfs and while entering suspend.
Left enabled?
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
Hi,
Few more comments below.
* Raja, Govindraj govindraj.r...@ti.com [120411 04:53]:
...
+static int __init omap_serial_fill_default_pads(struct omap_board_data
*bdata
Hi Tony,
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Raja, Govindraj govindraj.r...@ti.com wrote:
CC'ing Linux-ARM
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Govindraj.R govindraj.r...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Tony,
Please Pull the following omap uart changes.
Changes basically involves getting rid of cpu checks
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Santosh Shilimkar
santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote:
The current serial UART code, while fidling with ocp idlemode bits,
forget about the smart idle wakeup bit even if it is supported by
UART IP block. This will lead to missing the module wakeup on OMAP's
where
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Raja, Govindraj govindraj.r...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Tony,
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Raja, Govindraj govindraj.r...@ti.com
wrote:
CC'ing Linux-ARM
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Govindraj.R govindraj.r...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Tony,
Please Pull
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
Can someone tell me how this works with the current omap-serial driver
please? It looks to me like this has been broken when DMA support was
added to the driver.
Yes x-char transmission in dma case is
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
Hi
a few brief comments based on a quick scan:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012, Raja, Govindraj wrote:
Here is the patch [1] to do the same.
- I don't see where it affects I/O wakeups for the UART. If I/O wakeups
are still set
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Govindraj.R govindraj.r...@ti.com [120410 06:44]:
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c
@@ -120,11 +120,63 @@ static void omap_uart_set_smartidle(struct
platform_device *pdev) {}
#endif
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
Raja, Govindraj govindraj.r...@ti.com writes:
Hi Kevin,
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com writes:
[...]
Just to summarize on how the behavior should be IIUC
Hi Kevin,
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com writes:
[...]
I don't understand why a user would ever want to disable dynamic wakeups
on an in-use serial port via the sysfs power/wakeup file. (Disabling
wakeups from suspend is a
CC'ing Linux-ARM
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Govindraj.R govindraj.r...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Tony,
Please Pull the following omap uart changes.
Changes basically involves getting rid of cpu checks
for populating erratas and features and move the same
from serial.c to omap-serial.c, MVR
Hi Tony,
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Raja, Govindraj govindraj.r...@ti.com [120405 23:08]:
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
Hmm I don't think any muxing was done automatically unless
omap_serial_init_port
Hi Kevin / Paul,
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com writes:
On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, Raja, Govindraj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
On Mon, 2 Apr 2012, Raja, Govindraj wrote:
As of now
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Raja, Govindraj govindraj.r...@ti.com [120403 23:18]:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Govindraj.R govindraj.r...@ti.com [120321 03:06]:
From: Govindraj.R govindraj.r...@ti.com
Hi Afzal,
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
cc Tony
Hi,
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 15:03:36, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Could you try booting with initcall_debug and posting the boot log?
Logs as follows,
thanks.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Govindraj.R govindraj.r...@ti.com wrote:
From: Govindraj.R govindraj.r...@ti.com
Based on Linux-OMAP tree uart branch.
(git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap.git
remotes/origin/uart)
* Removes the cpu checks wherever possible and
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Govindraj.R govindraj.r...@ti.com [120321 03:06]:
From: Govindraj.R govindraj.r...@ti.com
The following commit:
(7496ba3 ARM: OMAP2+: UART: Add default mux for all uarts)
added default pads for all uarts. But not all
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
Hello Govindraj
On Mon, 2 Apr 2012, Raja, Govindraj wrote:
As of now what I can think of is to update qos reqest to prevent MPU
from transitioning in case of port activity if wakeup capability for port
is disabled
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Joe Woodward j...@terrafix.co.uk wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Raja, Govindraj govindraj.r...@ti.com
To: Joe Woodward j...@terrafix.co.uk
Cc: Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi ba
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Joe Woodward j...@terrafix.co.uk wrote:
...[snip]...
Could you please try attached patch and let me know if this solves the
rx issue as well,
without using dma mode.
Right,
I think we've getting closer, but still not quite there...
Firstly, the patch
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Joe Woodward j...@terrafix.co.uk wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Raja, Govindraj govindraj.r...@ti.com
To: Joe Woodward j...@terrafix.co.uk
Cc: Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi ba
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Govindraj,
On 3/28/2012 6:09, Raja, Govindraj wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Jon Hunterjon-hun...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Govindraj,
[...]
+ u32 mvr, scheme;
+ u16 revision, major, minor
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Joe Woodward j...@terrafix.co.uk wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Joe Woodward j...@terrafix.co.uk
To: Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com
Cc: Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com, Raja\\, Govindraj
govindraj.r...@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 04:08:55PM +0200, Igor Grinberg wrote:
When PHY reset pin is connected to a GPIO on external GPIO chip
(e.g. I2C), we should not call the gpio_set_value() function, but
gpio_set_value_cansleep().
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
Raja, Govindraj govindraj.r...@ti.com writes:
Hi Kevin,
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 6:04 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
+Govindraj,
Joe Woodward j...@terrafix.co.uk writes:
Right, I've stepped back a bit and dug out
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Govindraj,
On 3/21/2012 5:24, Govindraj.R wrote:
From: Govindraj.Rgovindraj.r...@ti.com
Currently the errata is populated based on cpu checks this can
be removed and replaced with module version check of uart ip
Hi Kevin,
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 6:04 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
+Govindraj,
Joe Woodward j...@terrafix.co.uk writes:
Right, I've stepped back a bit and dug out a GUSMTIX Palo43 carrier
board on which to test the Overo OMAP3530 COM and I've found:
- Running a stock 3.3 (with
Hi Paul,
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
Hi
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012, Raja, Govindraj wrote:
Sorry I for got to add that, here are details on what was tested.
1.) OMAP2430 SDP : Boot tested with uart1 as console.
2.) OMAP3430 SDP: Boot test, suspend/resume
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
Govindraj.R govindraj.r...@ti.com writes:
From: Govindraj.R govindraj.r...@ti.com
Based on Linux-OMAP tree uart branch.
(git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap.git
remotes/origin/uart)
* Removes
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Keshava Munegowda
keshava_mgo...@ti.com wrote:
From: Keshava Munegowda keshava_mgo...@ti.com
It is observed that the echi ports of 3430 sdp board
are not working due to the random timing of programming
the associated GPIOs of the ULPI PHYs of the EHCI for
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Raja, Govindraj govindraj.r...@ti.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Govindraj.R govindraj.r...@ti.com wrote:
[...]
From b3aa1dac5909cad1b959f5b97bbf408b2f974060 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Govindraj.R govindraj.r...@ti.com
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
Hi
On Tue, 6 Mar 2012, Raja, Govindraj wrote:
I see two ways of adding this tx wake-up flag.
1.) passing a feature flag from pdata and populating the feature value to
wer.
2.) Duplicating the uart1/2/3 hwmod
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Govindraj.R govindraj.r...@ti.com wrote:
From: Govindraj.R govindraj.r...@ti.com
Some modules doesn't have SYSC_HAS_ENAWAKEUP bit available
(ex: usb host uhh module) in absence of this flag
omap_hwmod_enable/disable_wakeup avoids configuring
pad mux wakeup
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote:
Op 5 mrt. 2012, om 12:12 heeft Govindraj.R het volgende geschreven:
From: Govindraj.R govindraj.r...@ti.com
On beagle some of uart mux lines are used for other
purpose so init only uart3.
Uart2 rx line clashes
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
Govindraj.R govindraj.r...@ti.com writes:
From: Govindraj.R govindraj.r...@ti.com
On beagle some of uart mux lines are used for other
purpose so init only uart3.
OK, but you should also be clear that this patch is
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com [120305 11:28]:
Govindraj.R govindraj.r...@ti.com writes:
From: Govindraj.R govindraj.r...@ti.com
On beagle some of uart mux lines are used for other
purpose so init only uart3.
OK, but
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 1:53 AM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
Hello Govindraj
Do you intend to update and repost this serial patch? Or should someone
else deal with it? It would be good to get support for this additional
wakeup bit.
Thanks for reminding.
(I had got preempted with
49 matches
Mail list logo
