Lindgren <t...@atomide.com>
> Cc: Barry Song <bao...@kernel.org>
> Cc: Andy Gross <agr...@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <vire...@kernel.org>
> Cc: Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.linux.ker...@gmail.com>
> Cc: Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org>
>
...@kernel.org
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c | 48 ++---
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2
...@kernel.org
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
---
arch/arm/mach-omap1/time.c | 35 ---
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/time.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/time.c
index
...@kernel.org
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
---
arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer32k.c | 33 -
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer32k.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap1
On 17 December 2014 at 20:58, Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com wrote:
I still do not see the need to crash the entire system - OK, fine
cpufreq is broke, but the remaining part of the system can easily
function. That BUG does look like a ugly point and lack of proper
cleanup logic - cpufreq should
On 17 December 2014 at 22:13, Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com wrote:
I do realize that i did have different opinion given bootloader screw
ups. Given that we have discovered a potentially bad configuration (in
this case for some reason almost ALL TI platforms have bad
configuration - could be due
On 17 December 2014 at 22:46, Kevin Hilman khil...@kernel.org wrote:
So this looks like a bug that has been hiding, but just exposed
because cpufreq-cpu0 (now cpufreq-dt) was not getting built-in since
before v3.18.
On omap4-panda-es, v3.18 with multi_v7_defconfig + CPUFREQ_DT enabled,
I see
On 17 December 2014 at 02:33, Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com wrote:
http://storage.armcloud.us/kernel-ci/next/next-20141216/arm-multi_v7_defconfig/lab-khilman/boot-omap5-uevm.html
[2.071996] [ cut here ]
[2.076831] kernel BUG at ../drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1258!
[
-CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0=y
+CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT=y
# CONFIG_ARM_OMAP2PLUS_CPUFREQ is not set
CONFIG_CPU_IDLE=y
CONFIG_BINFMT_MISC=y
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More
On 4 December 2014 at 23:13, nick xerofo...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings Kevin and the other maintainers of this file,
Hi,
I am wondering why the below code still has a fix me? It seems rather trivial
to fix, as all we need is the transition
time of the CPU. Due to this and I don't have the
On 10 July 2014 19:01, Santosh Shilimkar santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote:
Yep. Last time I blocked the series because all the DT conversions
were not done. Considering now the cpufreq-generic can work on non
DT platforms, I am ok to remove the omap-cpufreq.
Great.
--
To unsubscribe from this
-omap2/Kconfig| 1 -
arch/arm/mach-shmobile/Kconfig | 2 --
arch/arm/mach-vexpress/Kconfig | 1 -
arch/arm/mach-zynq/Kconfig | 1 -
drivers/devfreq/Kconfig| 1 -
kernel/power/Kconfig | 3 ---
10 files changed, 15 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku
On 5 May 2014 19:03, Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
int dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table(struct device *dev,
struct cpufreq_frequency_table **table)
{
- struct device_opp *dev_opp;
as needed isolated to just CPUFreq framework
alone.
Here, we just move relevant code and documentation to make this part of
CPUFreq infrastructure.
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net
Cc: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
Cc: Kevin Hilman khil...@deeprootsystems.com
Cc: cpuf
On 5 May 2014 19:55, Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
What if opp is being added for some reason at the same time?
I hope we can surely see some awkward results, maybe some
NULL pointers invocations as well..
we
On 2 May 2014 06:36, Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
index 1fbe11f..281ccfb 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
@@ -17,6 +17,11 @@ config CPU_FREQ
if CPU_FREQ
+config CPU_FREQ_PM_OPP
+
On 2 May 2014 10:48, Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com wrote:
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_opp.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_opp.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..2602ff8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com wrote:
PandaBoard-ES (OMAP4460): http://pastebin.com/qQCmA2ng
Hi Nishanth,
A colleague of mine (Sanjay), was trying mainline on panda board. And
wasn't able to get cpufreq-cpu0 working with it. Even your log also
reports its broken as
in the meantime.
This patch also removes a bogus usage of IS_ERR_VALUE(), which is intended
to be used only on combination pointer/error code return values; a
side-benefit.
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley pwalms...@nvidia.com
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar santosh.shilim...@ti.com
Cc: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku
(*new_opp),+} GFP_KERNEL);
It is almost impossible to catch these with naked eyes for such long
patches.. I took help of --word-diff though :)
If no one else sees these as problems then feel free to add my:
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On 20 September 2013 18:08, Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com wrote:
I am open to suggestions if any one feels we can improve this better.
I didn't really had one.. I thought of pm_opp** instead of dev_pm_opp**
though..
I believe that change was from Patch #2[1]
Yeah.. I just replied on a single
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 2:37 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
From: Russell King rmk+ker...@arm.linux.org.uk
On OMAP SMP configuartion, both processors share the voltage
and clock. So both CPUs needs to be scaled together and hence
needs software co-ordination.
Also, update lpj with
On 29 August 2013 19:07, Santosh Shilimkar santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote:
On Thursday 29 August 2013 06:02 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
cpumask_setall(policy-cpus);
Thats should work I guess. Infact I changed this i downstream kernel
a while back but forgot to send a patch. Just see if for some
On 30 August 2013 11:13, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 29 August 2013 19:12, Santosh Shilimkar santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote:
On Thursday 29 August 2013 09:39 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 29 August 2013 19:07, Santosh Shilimkar santosh.shilim...@ti.com
wrote:
On Thursday
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Libo Chen libo.c...@huawei.com wrote:
set the owner of platform_driver, to ensure that the
caller of driver holds a module refernece
Signed-off-by: Libo Chen libo.c...@huawei.com
---
drivers/usb/host/ehci-spear.c |1 +
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku
: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2303491/
V1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2273681/
arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c |9 +
drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c | 19 ++-
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
For cpufreq core:
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar
On 25 March 2013 14:06, Sekhar Nori nsek...@ti.com wrote:
There is a line in the code a little above the ones you deleted that
also sets these same variables. I guess you were relying on that line to
set policy-cur, but that also sets policy-{min, max} which can be
cleaned up.
This code is
On 25 March 2013 15:11, Sekhar Nori nsek...@ti.com wrote:
So down in the cpufreq driver probe below, we bail out if freq_table is
not provided. So all this checking for freq_table in the code you pasted
above is superfluous. If you can clean that part up and add checking for
Mundt let...@linux-sh.org
Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
---
Documentation/cpu-freq/cpu-drivers.txt | 5 +++--
arch/arm/mach-davinci/cpufreq.c| 4
arch/arm/mach-imx/cpufreq.c| 3 ---
arch/sh
(-)
delete mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Lavinen jarkko.lavi...@nokia.com
Cc: Venkatraman S svenk...@ti.com
Cc: Viresh Kumar viresh.li...@gmail.com
Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovet...@gmx.de
Cc: Ian Molton i...@mnementh.co.uk
Cc: Bruce Chang brucech...@via.com.tw
Cc: Harald Welte haraldwe...@viatech.com
Cc: Pierre Ossman pie
Lauss manuel.la...@gmail.com
Cc: Michał Mirosław mirq-li...@rere.qmqm.pl
Cc: Jarkko Lavinen jarkko.lavi...@nokia.com
Cc: Venkatraman S svenk...@ti.com
Cc: Viresh Kumar viresh.li...@gmail.com
Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovet...@gmx.de
Cc: Ian Molton i...@mnementh.co.uk
Cc: Bruce Chang
Hello,
Which branch should i use from TI[1] tree? I need to boot linux
with linaro-nano.
I tried: p-linux-omap-3.4 branch but i am getting compilation error for
omap4plus_pm_min_defconfig and omap2plus_defconfig:
/home/arm/work/kernel/mywork/linux.git/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S:
Assembler messages:
,
.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
},
- .irq = {IRQ_APPL_GPIO, NO_IRQ},
+ .irq = {IRQ_APPL_GPIO},
}
};
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@st.com
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body
},
-};
+AMBA_APB_DEVICE(spear3xx_uart, uart, 0, SPEAR3XX_ICM1_UART_BASE,
+ {SPEAR3XX_IRQ_UART}, NULL);
/* Do spear3xx familiy common initialization part here */
void __init spear3xx_init(void)
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@st.com
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
...@wantstofly.org
Cc: Linus Walleij linus.wall...@stericsson.com
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Nicolas Pitre n...@fluxnic.net
Cc: Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net
Cc: Sascha Hauer ker...@pengutronix.de
Cc: Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com
Cc: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@st.com
Cc: Wan ZongShun mcuos
36 matches
Mail list logo
