Re: [BUG] omap: mfd/regulator: twl/core: init order

2013-04-16 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Grygorii Strashko [130416 01:39]: > On 04/16/2013 10:45 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > >On 04/15/2013 06:25 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > >>This fix should not be needed. It just means the real > >>problem is somewhere else. Pinctrl is already before the i2c > >>in drivers/Makefile. Maybe one of the M

Re: [BUG] omap: mfd/regulator: twl/core: init order

2013-04-16 Thread Grygorii Strashko
On 04/16/2013 10:45 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: On 04/15/2013 06:25 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: This fix should not be needed. It just means the real problem is somewhere else. Pinctrl is already before the i2c in drivers/Makefile. Maybe one of the MFD drivers has a wrong initcall level? FYI; I just

Re: [BUG] omap: mfd/regulator: twl/core: init order

2013-04-16 Thread Peter Ujfalusi
On 04/15/2013 06:25 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > This fix should not be needed. It just means the real > problem is somewhere else. Pinctrl is already before the i2c > in drivers/Makefile. Maybe one of the MFD drivers has > a wrong initcall level? FYI; I just sent a patch which I believe is the corr

Re: [BUG] omap: mfd/regulator: twl/core: init order

2013-04-15 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Grygorii Strashko [130415 04:05]: > On 04/15/2013 01:56 PM, Christoph Fritz wrote: > >On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 13:20 +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > >>--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c > >>+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c > >>@@ -1014,7 +1014,18 @@ static struct platform_driver pcs_dri

Re: [BUG] omap: mfd/regulator: twl/core: init order

2013-04-15 Thread Grygorii Strashko
On 04/15/2013 01:56 PM, Christoph Fritz wrote: On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 13:20 +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote: On 04/13/2013 09:27 PM, Christoph Fritz wrote: Hi while testing an omap3 board with device tree support I stumbled upon a bug which is due to wrong initialization order of twl-core and

Re: [BUG] omap: mfd/regulator: twl/core: init order

2013-04-15 Thread Christoph Fritz
On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 13:20 +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > On 04/13/2013 09:27 PM, Christoph Fritz wrote: > > Hi > > > > while testing an omap3 board with device tree support I stumbled upon a > > bug which is due to wrong initialization order of twl-core and > > twl-regulator (I suppose): In

Re: [BUG] omap: mfd/regulator: twl/core: init order

2013-04-15 Thread Grygorii Strashko
On 04/13/2013 09:27 PM, Christoph Fritz wrote: Hi while testing an omap3 board with device tree support I stumbled upon a bug which is due to wrong initialization order of twl-core and twl-regulator (I suppose): In the boot process they get loaded way too late so that a lot of drivers before w

[BUG] omap: mfd/regulator: twl/core: init order

2013-04-13 Thread Christoph Fritz
Hi while testing an omap3 board with device tree support I stumbled upon a bug which is due to wrong initialization order of twl-core and twl-regulator (I suppose): In the boot process they get loaded way too late so that a lot of drivers before where configured wrong or just refuse to load. For