On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 03:14:01PM -0500, Suman Anna wrote:
Hi Tan,
On 06/14/2013 04:32 AM, LF.Tan wrote:
Hi Suman
Thanks for your reply.
I have took a look the patches you've mentioned in [1]. It is totally
new framework from what is located in linux-next git tree now.
Yes,
Hi Tan,
On 06/14/2013 04:32 AM, LF.Tan wrote:
Hi Suman
Thanks for your reply.
I have took a look the patches you've mentioned in [1]. It is totally
new framework from what is located in linux-next git tree now.
Yes, that is correct. The framework is different, but functionality
wise, you
Tan,
On 06/13/2013 06:01 AM, LF.Tan wrote:
Hi
I would like to add a new mailbox driver with this mailbox framework.
May I know this mailbox framework will available in kernel v3.10 or it
is pushed to v3.11?
Thanks.
This framework is dropped from v3.10 as this is being reworked and will
On Thursday 02 May 2013 17:09:07 Suman Anna wrote:
On 04/28/2013 11:07 PM, Jassi Brar wrote:
Now, we could either call it (effectively the TI's framework with
quirks for STE) as the Common API and then dismantle and convert it
patch by patch (authors and I seem to agree many things need to
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
On Thursday 02 May 2013 17:09:07 Suman Anna wrote:
I do not know how much of an impact it is for the ST driver as the
series adds the driver, and would have to wait until the RFC is sorted
out otherwise.
I think I'd prefer
On Friday 03 May 2013 15:39:42 Linus Walleij wrote:
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
On Thursday 02 May 2013 17:09:07 Suman Anna wrote:
I do not know how much of an impact it is for the ST driver as the
series adds the driver, and would have to wait until
On 05/02/2013 09:37 PM, Jassi Brar wrote:
On 3 May 2013 03:39, Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Arnd,
On 04/28/2013 11:07 PM, Jassi Brar wrote:
Not to mean only talk and no do, I prepared another proposal that
addressed all the concerns shared so far in the RFC
Hi Arnd,
On 04/28/2013 11:07 PM, Jassi Brar wrote:
Hello Arnd,
On 9 April 2013 16:25, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
On Thursday 04 April 2013, Anna, Suman wrote:
OMAP and ST-Ericsson platforms are both using mailbox to communicate with
some coprocessors. This series creates a
On 3 May 2013 03:39, Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Arnd,
On 04/28/2013 11:07 PM, Jassi Brar wrote:
Not to mean only talk and no do, I prepared another proposal that
addressed all the concerns shared so far in the RFC
http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1523873.html (its not ready
Hello Arnd,
On 9 April 2013 16:25, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
On Thursday 04 April 2013, Anna, Suman wrote:
OMAP and ST-Ericsson platforms are both using mailbox to communicate with
some coprocessors. This series creates a consolidated framework, living
under drivers/mailbox.
The
On Thursday 04 April 2013, Anna, Suman wrote:
OMAP and ST-Ericsson platforms are both using mailbox to communicate with
some coprocessors. This series creates a consolidated framework, living under
drivers/mailbox.
The changes mainly contain:
- create a mailbox framework independent from
On Thursday 04 April 2013, Anna, Suman wrote:
OMAP and ST-Ericsson platforms are both using mailbox to communicate with
some coprocessors. This series creates a consolidated framework, living under
drivers/mailbox.
The changes mainly contain:
- create a mailbox framework independent from
The following changes since commit f6161aa153581da4a3867a2d1a7caf4be19b6ec9:
Linux 3.9-rc2 (2013-03-10 16:54:19 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://github.com/sumananna/mailbox.git dbx500-prcmu-mailbox
for you to fetch changes up to
13 matches
Mail list logo
