[adding linux-pm, which I forgot to add in original post]
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@suse.com writes:
On Thursday, April 07, 2011, Kevin Hilman wrote:
This series aims to consolidate OMAP and SH-mobile runtime PM
implementations around the new device power domains.
In 2.6.39, device power
Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com writes:
[...]
Replacing the PM ops for all devices was done on OMAP and SH-mobile
because that was the only approach we had. Now that we have device
power domains (thanks Rafael!), we can be more selective about which
devices to apply them to.
Note that my RFC
On Thursday, April 07, 2011, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com writes:
[...]
Replacing the PM ops for all devices was done on OMAP and SH-mobile
because that was the only approach we had. Now that we have device
power domains (thanks Rafael!), we can be more selective
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@suse.com writes:
On Thursday, April 07, 2011, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com writes:
[...]
Replacing the PM ops for all devices was done on OMAP and SH-mobile
because that was the only approach we had. Now that we have device
power domains
This series aims to consolidate OMAP and SH-mobile runtime PM
implementations around the new device power domains.
In 2.6.39, device power domains were added (commit
7538e3db6e015e890825fbd9f8659952896ddd5b, PM: add support for device
power domains). In converting both OMAP and SH-mobile to use
On Thursday, April 07, 2011, Kevin Hilman wrote:
This series aims to consolidate OMAP and SH-mobile runtime PM
implementations around the new device power domains.
In 2.6.39, device power domains were added (commit
7538e3db6e015e890825fbd9f8659952896ddd5b, PM: add support for device
power
