On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 05:02:47PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
There is really nothing SH-mobile specific about this runtime PM
implementation. Any platform wanting to implement runtime PM based on
simple clock gating can use this implementation.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com
Paul Mundt let...@linux-sh.org writes:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 05:02:47PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
There is really nothing SH-mobile specific about this runtime PM
implementation. Any platform wanting to implement runtime PM based on
simple clock gating can use this implementation.
On Thursday, April 07, 2011, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Paul Mundt let...@linux-sh.org writes:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 05:02:47PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
There is really nothing SH-mobile specific about this runtime PM
implementation. Any platform wanting to implement runtime PM based on
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl writes:
On Thursday, April 07, 2011, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Paul Mundt let...@linux-sh.org writes:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 05:02:47PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
There is really nothing SH-mobile specific about this runtime PM
implementation. Any platform
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 05:38:38PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl writes:
On Thursday, April 07, 2011, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Paul Mundt let...@linux-sh.org writes:
This observation is wholly architecture agnostic, so it's not clear that
keeping it in
There is really nothing SH-mobile specific about this runtime PM
implementation. Any platform wanting to implement runtime PM based on
simple clock gating can use this implementation.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com
---
arch/arm/common/Makefile|1 +
