* Jon Hunter [130528 14:26]:
>
> On 28/05/13 07:24, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
> > of_property_read_string_index(...,&oh_name) in omap_dm_timer_init_one
> > does not alter the value of 'oh_name' even if the relevant function
> > fails and as 'oh_name' in stack may have a non-zero value, it would
> > b
On 28/05/13 07:24, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
> of_property_read_string_index(...,&oh_name) in omap_dm_timer_init_one
> does not alter the value of 'oh_name' even if the relevant function
> fails and as 'oh_name' in stack may have a non-zero value, it would
> be misunderstood by timer code that DT has
of_property_read_string_index(...,&oh_name) in omap_dm_timer_init_one
does not alter the value of 'oh_name' even if the relevant function
fails and as 'oh_name' in stack may have a non-zero value, it would
be misunderstood by timer code that DT has specified "ti,hwmod"
property for timer. 'oh_name'
