Hi Nishanth
On Fri, 18 May 2012, Nishanth Menon wrote:
From: Vikram Pandita vikram.pand...@ti.com
If the dpll is already locked, code can be optimized
to return much earlier than doing redundent set of lock mode
and wait on idlest.
Cc: Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com
Cc: Jon Hunter
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
Hi Nishanth
On Fri, 18 May 2012, Nishanth Menon wrote:
From: Vikram Pandita vikram.pand...@ti.com
If the dpll is already locked, code can be optimized
to return much earlier than doing redundent set of lock mode
and wait
On Thu, 24 May 2012, Menon, Nishanth wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
On Fri, 18 May 2012, Nishanth Menon wrote:
From: Vikram Pandita vikram.pand...@ti.com
If the dpll is already locked, code can be optimized
to return much earlier than
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
Okay. As I understand it, the maintainers above me would like
Signed-off-by:s from the entire submission patch, even if there are no
contributions to the patch itself. So please let me know if it's okay for
me to add your
From: Vikram Pandita vikram.pand...@ti.com
If the dpll is already locked, code can be optimized
to return much earlier than doing redundent set of lock mode
and wait on idlest.
Cc: Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com
Cc: Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com
Cc: Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com
Cc: Mike Turquette
