* Kevin Hilman [140313 11:30]:
> Nishanth Menon writes:
>
> > Just like IS_PM34XX_ERRATUM, IS_PM44XX_ERRATUM is valid only if
> > CONFIG_PM is enabled, else, disabling CONFIG_PM results in build
> > failure complaining about the following:
> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap4_b
Nishanth Menon writes:
> Just like IS_PM34XX_ERRATUM, IS_PM44XX_ERRATUM is valid only if
> CONFIG_PM is enabled, else, disabling CONFIG_PM results in build
> failure complaining about the following:
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap4_boot_secondary':
> :(.text+0x8a70): undefined
On Thursday 13 March 2014 06:07 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 03/12/2014 04:59 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> On Thursday 13 March 2014 05:43 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>> Just like IS_PM34XX_ERRATUM, IS_PM44XX_ERRATUM is valid only if
>>> CONFIG_PM is enabled, else, disabling CONFIG_PM results i
On 03/12/2014 04:59 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Thursday 13 March 2014 05:43 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> Just like IS_PM34XX_ERRATUM, IS_PM44XX_ERRATUM is valid only if
>> CONFIG_PM is enabled, else, disabling CONFIG_PM results in build
>> failure complaining about the following:
>> arch/arm
On Thursday 13 March 2014 05:43 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> Just like IS_PM34XX_ERRATUM, IS_PM44XX_ERRATUM is valid only if
> CONFIG_PM is enabled, else, disabling CONFIG_PM results in build
> failure complaining about the following:
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap4_boot_seconda
Just like IS_PM34XX_ERRATUM, IS_PM44XX_ERRATUM is valid only if
CONFIG_PM is enabled, else, disabling CONFIG_PM results in build
failure complaining about the following:
arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap4_boot_secondary':
:(.text+0x8a70): undefined reference to `pm44xx_errata'
Fixe