On 5/15/2012 5:00 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
+ Paul
Hi Tarun,
On 5/15/2012 1:42 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote:
Commit 68523f4233de5f233478dde0a63047b4efb710b8 (ARM: OMAP4:
Workaround the OCP synchronisation issue with 32K synctimer)
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> + Paul
>
> Hi Tarun,
>
> On 5/15/2012 1:42 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote:
>> Commit 68523f4233de5f233478dde0a63047b4efb710b8 (ARM: OMAP4:
>> Workaround the OCP synchronisation issue with 32K synctimer)
>> does not include GP Timers in ABE
+ Paul
Hi Tarun,
On 5/15/2012 1:42 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote:
> Commit 68523f4233de5f233478dde0a63047b4efb710b8 (ARM: OMAP4:
> Workaround the OCP synchronisation issue with 32K synctimer)
> does not include GP Timers in ABE domain. Since synchronization
> issue is applicable to all GPTIMER[1
Commit 68523f4233de5f233478dde0a63047b4efb710b8 (ARM: OMAP4:
Workaround the OCP synchronisation issue with 32K synctimer)
does not include GP Timers in ABE domain. Since synchronization
issue is applicable to all GPTIMER[1-12], we also need to set
static dependency of MPUSS with abe_clkdm and l4_pe